Motorola Moto X70 Air VS Vivo X300 Pro

Both the Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro are waterproof devices, with an IP69 rating and a waterproof depth of 1.5 meters. This ensures that they are both resistant to water and dust. However, there are some notable differences in their physical dimensions and weight. The Moto X70 Air is lighter, weighing 159 g, while the Vivo X300 Pro is heavier at 226 g. In terms of size, the Moto X70 Air is also slimmer with a thickness of just 6 mm compared to the Vivo X300 Pro's 8 mm thickness.

When it comes to the overall footprint, the Vivo X300 Pro is slightly larger, with a width of 75.5 mm and a height of 161.2 mm, while the Moto X70 Air measures 74.3 mm in width and 159.9 mm in height. This means the Vivo X300 Pro has a slightly larger volume at 97.3648 cm³ compared to the Moto X70 Air's 71.28342 cm³.

Neither device has a rugged build or the ability to fold, making them both similar in terms of these specific design features. Overall, the Motorola Moto X70 Air is lighter and more compact, whereas the Vivo X300 Pro is bulkier but offers a larger size overall.

Both the Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro feature OLED/AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth visuals. However, there are some differences in their display specifications. The Moto X70 Air has a 6.7″ screen size with a resolution of 1220 x 2712 px and a pixel density of 446 ppi. In contrast, the Vivo X300 Pro has a slightly larger 6.78″ screen size with a higher resolution of 1260 x 2800 px and a pixel density of 452 ppi, making the Vivo display a bit sharper.

Both displays are equipped with branded damage-resistant glass, support HDR10, HDR10+, and Always-On Display. The Vivo X300 Pro stands out with additional support for Dolby Vision, which is not available on the Moto X70 Air. Neither device has a secondary screen or offers any unusual touch functionality beyond the standard touch screen capabilities.

In summary, while both displays are very similar in terms of core features, the Vivo X300 Pro offers a slightly larger, sharper display with Dolby Vision support, while the Moto X70 Air delivers a slightly smaller screen with the same high-quality essentials, but lacks Dolby Vision.

The Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro both offer high-performance hardware, but there are notable differences in their specifications. The Moto X70 Air is equipped with 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, while the Vivo X300 Pro offers 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, giving it a larger capacity for both storage and memory.

In terms of processing power, the Moto X70 Air uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset, with a CPU speed configuration of 1 x 2.8 GHz, 4 x 2.4 GHz, and 3 x 1.8 GHz. The Vivo X300 Pro, on the other hand, features the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, with a faster CPU configuration of 1 x 4.21 GHz, 3 x 3.5 GHz, and 4 x 2.7 GHz. The Vivo's GPU clock speed is also higher, at 1750 MHz compared to the Moto X70 Air's 1000 MHz, which may translate to a higher graphical performance.

Other key performance features show the Moto X70 Air's RAM speed is 4200 MHz, while the Vivo X300 Pro has faster RAM at 5333 MHz. The Moto X70 Air uses a 4 nm semiconductor size, while the Vivo X300 Pro uses a more advanced 3 nm process. Additionally, the Vivo X300 Pro boasts a significantly higher maximum memory bandwidth at 85.3 GB/s, compared to the Moto X70 Air's 33.6 GB/s. Both devices support 64-bit architecture, integrated LTE, multithreading, and big.LITTLE technology, and both use DDR5 memory. The Moto X70 Air supports OpenCL version 2, while the Vivo X300 Pro supports OpenCL version 3, which may indicate a slight difference in compatibility for certain applications.

The Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro both feature impressive camera setups, with notable differences in their specifications. The Moto X70 Air has a dual-lens main camera with 50MP and 50MP sensors, while the Vivo X300 Pro offers a more advanced triple-lens setup, consisting of 200MP, 50MP, and 50MP sensors. The Moto X70 Air’s wide apertures are 2.0f and 1.8f for the main camera, while the Vivo X300 Pro has wider apertures of 2.7f, 1.6f, and 2.0f for its main lenses. This may allow the Vivo X300 Pro to capture more light, particularly in low-light conditions.

Both devices feature a 50MP front camera with a 2.0f wide aperture. The Moto X70 Air includes a single LED flash, while the Vivo X300 Pro has two flash LEDs. Both phones support similar camera functions, including optical image stabilization, phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during video recording, manual exposure, and slow-motion video recording. Both phones also support the creation of panoramas in-camera and offer manual settings for ISO, focus, and white balance. The Moto X70 Air does not include laser autofocus, while the Vivo X300 Pro does.

On the video side, the Moto X70 Air can record at 2160 x 30 fps, while the Vivo X300 Pro offers higher-resolution 4320 x 30 fps recording. Neither phone supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Both phones feature a front camera without a dedicated LED flash, and neither includes a dual-lens front camera or the ability to record 3D photos/videos. The Vivo X300 Pro’s main camera also provides 3.7x optical zoom, while the Moto X70 Air has no optical zoom capabilities.

Both the Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro run Android 16 and share most of the same features in their operating systems. These include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, dark mode, battery health check, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, app offloading, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, PiP, sharing intents, child lock, widgets, offline voice recognition, and voice commands. They also both support tracking the current position of the device and are multi-user systems.

While most features are identical, there are a couple of key points worth noting. Neither device offers Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, Quick Start, or the ability to use the phone as a PC. Both devices also lack Mail Privacy Protection and cross-site tracking blocking. The Moto X70 Air has an extra feature in that it can track the current position of the device, which is also present on the Vivo X300 Pro.

In summary, the operating systems on both phones are largely the same, with very similar functionalities, and neither has any major differences in terms of core features. The lack of distinct features for either product makes the user experience on both devices quite similar overall.

The Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro both feature strong battery setups, but there are some differences. The Moto X70 Air is equipped with a 4800 mAh battery, while the Vivo X300 Pro has a larger 6510 mAh battery, offering more capacity for extended usage.

Both devices support wireless charging, but the Vivo X300 Pro offers faster wireless charging with a 40W speed compared to the Moto X70 Air’s 15W wireless charging speed. In terms of wired charging, the Moto X70 Air supports fast charging at 68W, while the Vivo X300 Pro supports a faster 90W charging speed.

Additionally, the Vivo X300 Pro has reverse wireless charging capabilities, allowing it to charge other devices wirelessly, a feature not available on the Moto X70 Air. Both phones have non-removable rechargeable batteries, a battery level indicator, and support fast charging. Neither device offers a removable battery.

Both the Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro are equipped with stereo speakers, but neither device includes a 3.5 mm audio jack. When it comes to audio codecs, the Moto X70 Air does not support aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, meaning it has more basic Bluetooth audio support. On the other hand, the Vivo X300 Pro supports aptX and aptX HD, but does not have support for LDAC, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, offering a slightly more advanced Bluetooth audio experience with higher-quality audio streaming.

Both devices lack a built-in radio, so neither offers traditional FM or AM radio functionality.

In summary, while both phones provide stereo speakers, the Vivo X300 Pro has an edge with aptX and aptX HD support, whereas the Moto X70 Air has no advanced Bluetooth audio support.

Both the Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro come with 5G support, ensuring fast mobile data speeds. They both also feature dual SIM card slots (2 SIM) and NFC capabilities. However, there are a few differences in connectivity features between the two devices. The Moto X70 Air supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), while the Vivo X300 Pro adds support for the newer Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) alongside the same Wi-Fi standards found in the Moto X70 Air, making the Vivo more future-proof in terms of Wi-Fi connectivity.

When it comes to Bluetooth, the Moto X70 Air supports Bluetooth version 5.4, whereas the Vivo X300 Pro features the more advanced Bluetooth version 6, offering better range and performance. Additionally, the Vivo X300 Pro has a USB 3.2 port, which is faster than the Moto X70 Air’s USB 2 port.

Both phones include essential sensors like a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass. The Moto X70 Air lacks an infrared sensor, while the Vivo X300 Pro includes one. The Vivo X300 Pro also supports emergency SOS via satellite, a feature the Moto X70 Air does not have. Neither device supports motion tracking, optical tracking, or includes a built-in projector. Additionally, both phones are equipped with fingerprint scanners, but neither offers 3D facial recognition or an iris scanner.

Both the Motorola Moto X70 Air and the Vivo X300 Pro feature a video light, which helps improve lighting when recording videos in low-light conditions. Neither device is equipped with sapphire glass for the display, and neither has a curved display. Additionally, both phones do not include an e-paper display, which is often used for low-power, always-on screens.

In summary, the miscellaneous features of both devices are identical, with no notable differences in terms of display or additional special features in this category.