Motorola Razr 60 (256GB / 8GB RAM) VS Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE are waterproof, with an IPX8 rating, meaning they can withstand submersion in water beyond a certain depth. The Razr 60 weighs 188 g, slightly heavier than the Z Flip 7 FE, which weighs 187 g. In terms of thickness, the Razr 60 is 7.3 mm thick, while the Z Flip 7 FE is a bit slimmer at 6.9 mm. The width of the Razr 60 is 74 mm, while the Z Flip 7 FE is narrower at 71.9 mm. When it comes to height, the Razr 60 stands at 171.3 mm, which is taller than the Z Flip 7 FE at 165.1 mm.

As for volume, the Razr 60 has a larger volume of 92.53626 cm³ compared to the Z Flip 7 FE's 81.907761 cm³. Both devices are foldable, offering a compact form factor when closed. While the design of both phones provides similar flexibility with foldability, the Razr 60's slightly larger size may give it a bit more bulk when unfolded, although the difference is minimal in terms of usability.

Overall, the two devices offer comparable design features, with differences in size and weight that could influence how they feel in hand or fit in pockets. However, both maintain an impressive level of water resistance with the same IPX8 rating, making them resilient in wet environments.

The Motorola Razr 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE both feature OLED/AMOLED displays with a resolution of 1080 x 2640 px, ensuring crisp, vibrant visuals. The Razr 60 has a slightly larger screen at 6.9″, compared to the Z Flip 7 FE’s 6.7″. In terms of pixel density, the Z Flip 7 FE has a higher 426 ppi, while the Razr 60 has 413 ppi, offering a marginally lower pixel density.

Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling and transitions. They also both support HDR10 and HDR10+, enhancing the color and contrast of compatible content. However, there is a notable difference when it comes to branded damage-resistant glass: the Razr 60 is equipped with it, whereas the Z Flip 7 FE does not have this feature.

Additionally, both phones have a secondary screen and support touch input, ensuring convenience and ease of use. Overall, both displays are quite similar in many aspects, but the Razr 60 stands out with its larger screen and added protection against damage, while the Z Flip 7 FE offers a slightly higher pixel density.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE come with 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, providing a solid amount of space and memory for most users. In terms of the chipset, the Razr 60 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, while the Z Flip 7 FE uses the Samsung Exynos 2400. Both devices feature integrated LTE, supporting high-speed mobile connectivity.

The Razr 60 has a CPU configuration of 4 x 2.6 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz, with 8 threads, while the Z Flip 7 FE has a more complex CPU setup with 2 x 2.9 GHz, 3 x 2.6 GHz, 4 x 2 GHz, and 1 x 3.2 GHz, utilizing 10 threads. In terms of GPU, the Razr 60 is equipped with the Mali G615 MC2, clocked at 1047 MHz, while the Z Flip 7 FE features the Xclipse 940 GPU, with a slightly lower clock speed of 1009 MHz.

For RAM speed, the Razr 60 has a faster 6400 MHz, while the Z Flip 7 FE has 4200 MHz. The Razr 60 also offers a maximum memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, while the Z Flip 7 FE boasts a higher maximum bandwidth of 64 GB/s. While both devices support 64-bit processing and DirectX 12, the Razr 60 supports a maximum memory amount of 16GB, whereas the Z Flip 7 FE can handle up to 24GB of memory. Both phones use DDR5 memory and feature a 4 nm semiconductor size. In terms of multi-core processing, the Razr 60 uses big.LITTLE technology, just like the Z Flip 7 FE.

The Motorola Razr 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE both feature dual-lens main cameras, with the Razr 60 offering a 13 MP and 50 MP setup, and the Z Flip 7 FE having a 50 MP and 12 MP configuration. The Razr 60 has a wide aperture of 2.2f for the 13 MP lens and 1.7f for the 50 MP lens, while the Z Flip 7 FE's wide apertures are 2.2f for the 50 MP lens and 1.8f for the 12 MP lens. Both devices support video recording at 2160 x 30 fps, with the Z Flip 7 FE having the added advantage of supporting 60 fps for smoother video capture.

Both phones come with a variety of advanced features, including built-in optical image stabilization, continuous autofocus during video recording, and phase-detection autofocus for photos. Both devices also support slow-motion video recording, HDR mode, manual exposure, manual ISO, serial shot mode, manual focus, and touch autofocus. Additionally, they can create panoramas in-camera, feature a timelapse function, and support manual white balance. However, the Razr 60 lacks a BSI sensor, while the Z Flip 7 FE includes one. The Razr 60 does not shoot raw images, whereas the Z Flip 7 FE supports raw image capture.

For front cameras, the Razr 60 has a 32 MP lens with a wide aperture of 2.4f, while the Z Flip 7 FE's front camera is a 10 MP lens with a wider aperture of 2.2f. Neither device features a dual-lens front camera or front-facing LED flash, although both have a flash on the main camera. The Razr 60 lacks a BSI sensor on the front camera, while the Z Flip 7 FE includes one. Overall, both phones offer robust camera systems with a range of professional-grade features, though the Z Flip 7 FE provides additional capabilities like raw image support and a BSI sensor on both cameras.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE run on Android 15, with the same core set of features. Both devices have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. They also share the ability to play games while they download, support dark mode, and have Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health check, an extra dim mode, and dynamic theming. Additionally, both phones include features such as on-device machine learning, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture) functionality.

When it comes to privacy and customization, both phones allow theme customization, have notification permissions, and provide a media picker. However, neither device blocks cross-site tracking, and neither supports Mail Privacy Protection. They both support split-screen multitasking, offload apps, and can track the current position of the device. Both devices also support offline voice recognition and voice commands, and they are multi-user systems.

There are a few features where the two phones are identical: both have a child lock, support widgets, are free and open-source, and have sharing intents. Neither device gets direct OS updates or can be used as a PC, and both lack Quick Start features. Overall, the operating systems of the Razr 60 and the Z Flip 7 FE offer very similar functionality, with the same core features and privacy settings, making them quite comparable in terms of software experience.

The Motorola Razr 60 comes with a 4500 mAh battery, which is slightly larger than the 4000 mAh battery found in the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE. Both phones support wireless charging at a speed of 15W, and both have rechargeable, non-removable batteries. The Razr 60 supports fast charging at 30W, while the Z Flip 7 FE supports fast charging at 25W, providing a slight difference in charging speed.

In terms of additional features, the Razr 60 does not offer reverse wireless charging, while the Z Flip 7 FE does. Both devices have a battery level indicator, making it easy to check the remaining battery life, but neither device has a removable battery. Both phones also feature wireless charging capabilities, enhancing convenience for users who prefer charging without cables.

Overall, while the Razr 60 offers a slightly larger battery and faster wired charging, the Z Flip 7 FE stands out with its reverse wireless charging feature, allowing it to charge other devices wirelessly.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users will need to rely on Bluetooth or USB-C for wired audio connections. Both phones are equipped with stereo speakers, providing enhanced audio output for media consumption. The Razr 60 supports aptX, which is a higher-quality Bluetooth codec for audio streaming, while the Z Flip 7 FE does not support aptX. Neither device includes a built-in radio, so users will need to rely on streaming for radio access.

Overall, the key difference between these two devices in the audio category is the Razr 60’s support for aptX, which can provide better audio quality when paired with compatible Bluetooth headphones or speakers, while the Z Flip 7 FE lacks this feature.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast mobile internet speeds. They both also have similar Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). Each phone supports dual SIM functionality with 1 SIM and 1 eSIM. Both devices are equipped with Bluetooth 5.4, USB Type-C, NFC, and have a fingerprint scanner for security.

In terms of additional sensors, both phones include a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass. However, the Z Flip 7 FE offers an additional barometer, which the Razr 60 does not have. Neither device supports ANT+, has a heart rate monitor, or includes an infrared sensor, while both have cellular modules for network connectivity. Neither phone includes 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, a stylus, or a built-in projector.

Overall, the key difference between these two devices in terms of connectivity and features is the inclusion of a barometer on the Z Flip 7 FE, while the Razr 60 does not offer this feature. Both devices are well-equipped with essential connectivity options, sensors, and security features.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE come equipped with a video light, allowing for improved lighting during video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass display protection, and neither includes an e-paper display. These specifications are identical between the two devices, indicating that both phones offer similar functionality in this miscellaneous category.

In summary, both phones share the same key features in this group, with a video light present on each device, but they lack sapphire glass displays and e-paper displays.