Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB VS Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 offer waterproofing with an IPX8 rating, meaning they can be submerged in water without damage. The Razr 60 Ultra weighs 199 g, while the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is slightly lighter at 188 g. In terms of thickness, the Razr 60 Ultra is 7.2 mm thick, while the Z Flip 7 is thinner at 6.5 mm. When it comes to width, the Razr 60 Ultra measures 74 mm, while the Z Flip 7 is slightly wider at 75.2 mm. The Razr 60 Ultra is taller at 171.5 mm, compared to the Z Flip 7's 166.7 mm height. Regarding volume, the Razr 60 Ultra has a larger volume of 91.3752 cm³, whereas the Z Flip 7's volume is 81.48296 cm³. Both devices can be folded, offering a compact form factor when not in use.

In summary, while both phones have similar water resistance features, the Razr 60 Ultra is slightly heavier, thicker, and taller, with a larger volume than the Z Flip 7. On the other hand, the Z Flip 7 is thinner, lighter, and more compact in size.

Overall, the two devices have comparable design features, with differences in weight, thickness, height, and volume that may affect user preference depending on individual priorities like portability or screen size.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Razr 60 Ultra has a slightly larger screen at 7 inches, while the Z Flip 7's display measures 6.9 inches. In terms of pixel density, the Razr 60 Ultra offers 417 ppi, which is higher than the Z Flip 7's 397 ppi, potentially leading to slightly sharper visuals on the Razr 60 Ultra. The Razr 60 Ultra also has a higher resolution of 1224 x 2912 px compared to the Z Flip 7's 1080 x 2520 px, further contributing to its greater pixel density. Both devices support HDR10 and HDR10+ for enhanced color and contrast, and both have touchscreens and secondary screens. However, the Razr 60 Ultra supports a 165Hz refresh rate, which is significantly higher than the Z Flip 7's 120Hz, resulting in smoother animations and interactions on the Razr 60 Ultra.

Additionally, the Razr 60 Ultra features branded damage-resistant glass, providing extra durability, while the Z Flip 7 lacks this feature. Both devices support touch input and have secondary screens, but there is no mention of a specific branded damage-resistant glass for the Z Flip 7.

Overall, the Razr 60 Ultra offers a slightly better display with higher resolution, pixel density, and refresh rate, along with enhanced durability thanks to branded damage-resistant glass. The Z Flip 7, however, still provides a solid display experience, though with slightly lower specs in these areas.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 both offer impressive performance features, though there are some key differences. Both devices come with 512GB of internal storage, but the Razr 60 Ultra is equipped with 16GB of RAM, while the Z Flip 7 has 12GB of RAM. The Razr 60 Ultra also boasts a higher AnTuTu benchmark score of 1,831,212, compared to the Z Flip 7's 1,513,343, indicating a noticeable difference in overall performance. The Razr 60 Ultra is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, with an octa-core CPU that includes two cores running at 4.32 GHz and six cores at 3.53 GHz. In comparison, the Z Flip 7 features the Samsung Exynos 2500 chipset, with a more complex CPU configuration (two cores at 2.74 GHz, five cores at 2.36 GHz, two cores at 1.8 GHz, and one core at 3.3 GHz).

Both devices have integrated LTE and support 64-bit processing, but the Razr 60 Ultra has a higher GPU clock speed at 1100 MHz compared to the Z Flip 7’s 1009 MHz. The Razr 60 Ultra also has faster RAM speed at 5300 MHz, while the Z Flip 7’s RAM speed is 4200 MHz. Both devices feature a 3 nm semiconductor size, and both support DirectX 12, integrated graphics, big.LITTLE technology, HMP, TrustZone, and multithreading. The Razr 60 Ultra, however, has a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 85.1 GB/s, compared to the Z Flip 7's 64 GB/s.

In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the Razr 60 Ultra has a slightly higher TDP at 8.2W compared to the Z Flip 7’s 6W. Both devices use DDR5 memory, with a maximum memory amount of 24GB, but no other details are provided about memory configuration. Overall, the Razr 60 Ultra seems to offer stronger performance specifications, especially in terms of RAM, GPU speed, and benchmark scores, while the Z Flip 7 is a solid performer but with slightly lower specs in some areas.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 both offer impressive camera setups, though they differ in several key aspects. The Razr 60 Ultra has a dual-lens main camera with 50 MP and 50 MP sensors, while the Z Flip 7 features a 50 MP and 12 MP dual-lens setup. The Razr 60 Ultra’s wide apertures are 2f and 1.8f, compared to the Z Flip 7’s 2.2f and 1.8f, meaning the Z Flip 7 has a slightly narrower aperture on the wide lens. For front cameras, the Razr 60 Ultra has a 50 MP front-facing camera with a 2f aperture, while the Z Flip 7 has a 10 MP front camera with a 2.2f aperture. Both devices support features like phase-detection autofocus, HDR mode, and manual exposure, with the Razr 60 Ultra offering slightly higher megapixels for both the main and front cameras.

In terms of video recording, the Razr 60 Ultra supports 4320 x 30 fps for the main camera, while the Z Flip 7 supports 2160 x 60 fps, allowing for higher frame rates on the Z Flip 7. Both devices have continuous autofocus, slow-motion video recording, and timelapse functions. The Razr 60 Ultra does not feature a BSI sensor, while the Z Flip 7 does. Both phones lack a dual-tone LED flash, but they do have a single flash LED, and neither has a front-facing LED flash.

Both phones are equipped with similar camera functions like manual ISO, manual focus, serial shot mode, and touch autofocus. However, the Razr 60 Ultra does not support shooting in raw format, while the Z Flip 7 does. Overall, the Razr 60 Ultra stands out with its higher megapixel count for both the main and front cameras, but the Z Flip 7 offers a higher front camera resolution and raw photo capabilities.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 run Android 15 and offer similar privacy features, such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. Both phones support theme customization, blocking app tracking, and on-device machine learning. They also include features like notification permissions, media pickers, dark mode, and the ability to play games while they download. Additionally, both devices offer customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, and picture-in-picture (PiP) mode.

Neither device supports direct OS updates, Wi-Fi password sharing, or has a Quick Start feature. Both phones allow app offloading, have battery health checks, an extra dim mode, dynamic theming, and share intents. They also support widgets, are free and open source, and include offline voice recognition and voice commands. Additionally, both devices can track the current position of a mobile device and support a multi-user system. A notable similarity is that both phones lack focus modes, child locks, and laser autofocus.

In summary, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 offer nearly identical operating system features, with no significant differences in functionality, privacy, or customization options. Both devices provide a robust Android 15 experience with many advanced features and security options.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 both offer solid battery features with a few key differences. The Razr 60 Ultra has a larger battery capacity at 4700 mAh, compared to the Z Flip 7's 4300 mAh. Both devices support wireless charging, with the Razr 60 Ultra offering faster wireless charging at 30W, while the Z Flip 7 supports 15W wireless charging. In terms of fast charging, the Razr 60 Ultra supports a higher charging speed of 68W, whereas the Z Flip 7 supports 25W fast charging.

The Razr 60 Ultra does not support reverse wireless charging, while the Z Flip 7 includes reverse wireless charging at 4.5W. Both devices have a non-removable rechargeable battery and include a battery level indicator. Neither device offers a removable battery.

Overall, the Razr 60 Ultra has a higher battery capacity, faster charging capabilities, and more powerful wireless charging. On the other hand, the Z Flip 7 offers reverse wireless charging but with slower wireless and wired charging speeds.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. Both devices are equipped with stereo speakers for enhanced audio quality. However, the Razr 60 Ultra has aptX support, enabling higher-quality wireless audio streaming, while the Z Flip 7 does not include this feature. Neither device has a built-in radio.

In summary, both devices offer stereo speakers, but the Razr 60 Ultra stands out with aptX support, which the Z Flip 7 lacks. Neither device has a 3.5 mm audio jack or radio functionality.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 both support 5G connectivity, providing fast internet speeds. They each come with 1 SIM card and 1 eSIM slot and offer similar Bluetooth versions, with both devices supporting Bluetooth 5.4. The Razr 60 Ultra has USB Type-C with a USB 2.0 version, while the Z Flip 7 has the more advanced USB 3.2 version of USB Type-C. Both phones also include NFC support and have identical Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 6E, and Wi-Fi 7. In terms of download and upload speeds, the Razr 60 Ultra can reach download speeds of 10,000 MBits/s and upload speeds of 3,500 MBits/s, while the Z Flip 7 offers slightly lower speeds of 9,640 MBits/s for downloads and 2,550 MBits/s for uploads.

Both devices feature a fingerprint scanner, a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass, and they support Galileo. Neither phone has a heart rate monitor, infrared sensor, or optical tracking. Both also lack a stylus, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, or built-in projector. They are equipped with a cellular module, barometer, and motion tracking is not available on either phone.

Overall, while both devices share many key connectivity and feature specifications, the Razr 60 Ultra offers slightly faster download and upload speeds, while the Z Flip 7 benefits from a more advanced USB Type-C port. Otherwise, the two phones are very similar in terms of connectivity and sensors.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 are equipped with a video light, which can be useful for low-light photography or video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, and neither includes an e-paper display.

In summary, the two phones are identical in this group, both offering a video light while lacking sapphire glass and e-paper displays.