Motorola Razr 60 Ultra VS Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

The most fundamental design difference here is form factor: the Razr 60 Ultra is a foldable flip phone, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra is a traditional candybar slab. This single distinction shapes how you interact with each device daily — the Razr folds in half to become far more pocketable, whereas the S25 Ultra maintains a fixed, larger footprint at all times. In terms of raw physical size when open, the Razr 60 Ultra is notably more compact, with a 91.4 cm³ volume versus the S25 Ultra's 103.6 cm³, and it is lighter at 199 g compared to 218 g — a meaningful difference you will feel during extended one-handed use or when carrying it all day.

On thickness, the Razr measures just 7.2 mm unfolded versus the S25 Ultra's 8.2 mm — a 13% slimmer profile that contributes to a more premium, sleek feel in-hand. However, it is worth noting that when folded, the Razr will be significantly thicker than either device is unfolded, so the thinness advantage applies only in open/use mode.

Both phones are waterproof, but there is a meaningful technical distinction: the S25 Ultra carries a full IP68 rating, meaning it is certified against both dust and water ingress, while the Razr 60 Ultra holds an IPX8 rating — the ″X″ indicates no official dust-resistance certification. For most users this will not matter day-to-day, but in dusty or sandy environments the S25 Ultra has a verifiable edge. Overall, the Razr 60 Ultra wins on portability and weight, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra counters with a more complete ingress protection rating and the simplicity of a non-folding build.

Both screens use OLED/AMOLED technology with full HDR10 and HDR10+ support, so baseline display quality is strong on either device. The sharpness advantage, however, belongs clearly to the Galaxy S25 Ultra: its 498 ppi pixel density at 1440 x 3120 resolution is noticeably crisper than the Razr 60 Ultra's 417 ppi at 1224 x 2912. In practice, that roughly 20% density gap means finer text, tighter icon edges, and more detail in high-resolution photos — perceptible to a careful eye, especially at close viewing distances.

Where the Razr 60 Ultra punches back is in responsiveness. Its 165Hz refresh rate outpaces the S25 Ultra's 120Hz panel, delivering smoother scrolling and more fluid animations — a difference that gamers and power users will feel immediately. The Razr also leads on touch sampling at 300Hz versus 240Hz, meaning faster input registration during fast-paced interactions. Additionally, the Razr supports Dolby Vision while the S25 Ultra does not, which matters for streaming Dolby Vision-mastered content from platforms like Netflix or Apple TV+ at its intended quality grade.

A uniquely Razr advantage is its secondary screen — an external display usable without ever unfolding the phone, adding genuine everyday utility. Taking everything together, the S25 Ultra holds the edge in raw pixel fidelity, but the Razr 60 Ultra counters with a higher refresh rate, superior touch responsiveness, Dolby Vision support, and the bonus of a second screen, making it the stronger all-around display package for users who prioritize fluidity and versatility over sheer sharpness.

At first glance, these two phones appear nearly identical under the hood — both run the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite on a 3 nm process with the same Adreno 830 GPU, identical memory bandwidth, and the same TDP. Yet the benchmark results tell a strikingly different story. The Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 2,207,809 on AnTuTu versus the Razr 60 Ultra's 1,831,212 — a roughly 20% gap — and the Geekbench 6 divergence is even more dramatic: 3,057 vs 1,753 single-core and 9,846 vs 6,796 multi-core. The root cause is the S25 Ultra's higher peak CPU clock on its performance cores (4.47 GHz vs 4.32 GHz) and a faster GPU clock (1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz), suggesting Samsung has given its variant more thermal headroom or a more aggressive power profile to sustain higher clocks under load.

The one area where the Razr 60 Ultra pulls ahead is RAM: it ships with 16 GB versus the S25 Ultra's 12 GB. More RAM means more apps kept live in the background, smoother multitasking, and greater longevity as apps grow more demanding over time — a genuine advantage for heavy multitaskers, even if it does not translate directly into benchmark wins.

On pure computational throughput, the Galaxy S25 Ultra holds a clear and consistent edge across CPU and GPU benchmarks despite sharing the same base silicon. The Razr 60 Ultra's extra RAM offers a meaningful multitasking counterpoint, but for users who push their phones hard — sustained gaming, heavy video editing, or demanding AI workloads — the S25 Ultra's measurably higher sustained performance makes it the stronger performer in this category.

The camera systems here represent fundamentally different philosophies. The Razr 60 Ultra keeps things focused with a dual-lens rear setup (50 + 50 MP), while the Galaxy S25 Ultra deploys a quad-camera array anchored by a 200 MP primary sensor alongside three additional lenses. That 200 MP main sensor captures an extraordinary level of detail for cropping and large-format output, and the S25 Ultra's focal length range of 24 mm to 111 mm with 5x optical zoom means it can genuinely reach distant subjects without quality loss. The Razr, by contrast, offers 0x optical zoom and a maximum focal length of just 24 mm, limiting its versatility for telephoto or zoom photography entirely.

The S25 Ultra also pulls ahead on capability features: it supports RAW shooting and manual shutter speed control — tools that matter to enthusiast photographers who want full control over exposure and post-processing — neither of which the Razr offers. It also adds laser autofocus and a BSI sensor on its primary camera, both contributing to faster, more accurate focus in challenging conditions. On the Razr's side, its front camera resolution is a striking 50 MP versus the S25 Ultra's 12 MP selfie camera — a meaningful edge for selfie-focused users — and it supports Dolby Vision recording where the S25 Ultra does not.

Taken as a whole, the Galaxy S25 Ultra holds a commanding advantage in rear camera versatility, depth of control, and zoom capability. The Razr 60 Ultra carves out a niche with its exceptional front camera and Dolby Vision video, but for users who prioritize a comprehensive, multi-scenario rear camera system, the S25 Ultra is the clear winner in this category.

Running the same Android 15 base, these two phones share a remarkably deep feature set — privacy controls, dynamic theming, split-screen, Picture-in-Picture, offline voice recognition, widgets, and dark mode are all present on both. For the vast majority of everyday software tasks, users switching between these devices would feel right at home on either one.

The differences, while few, are worth noting for specific use cases. The Galaxy S25 Ultra adds cross-site tracking blocking, Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, and crucially, the ability to be used as a PC — the last of which is a meaningful productivity differentiator for users who want to connect their phone to a monitor and work in a desktop-style environment. The Razr 60 Ultra lacks all four of these features. Cross-site tracking blocking and focus modes are quality-of-life additions, but DeX-style PC functionality represents a genuinely different use-case tier that the Razr simply cannot match based on the provided data.

Given how closely aligned the two are across the broader OS feature set, the Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a clear edge here — not because the Razr is lacking in fundamentals, but because Samsung's additions, particularly PC mode and focus modes, extend the device's utility in ways the Razr does not offer.

Capacity and charging speed pull in opposite directions here, creating a genuine trade-off. The Galaxy S25 Ultra holds a larger 5000 mAh battery versus the Razr 60 Ultra's 4700 mAh — a 6% difference that, all else being equal, translates to modestly longer endurance between charges. For a day-to-day user, that margin may mean comfortably reaching end of day versus needing a top-up in the evening.

Flip the equation to charging speed, though, and the Razr 60 Ultra surges ahead. Its 68W wired fast charging significantly outpaces the S25 Ultra's 45W, meaning the Razr can recover battery far faster during a short break — a meaningful advantage for users with busy schedules who rely on quick top-ups rather than overnight charging. The Razr's wireless charging is also faster at 30W compared to the S25 Ultra's 15W, doubling the wireless replenishment rate for those who prefer cable-free charging pads.

The S25 Ultra's one exclusive charging feature is reverse wireless charging, allowing it to share power with other Qi-compatible devices like earbuds or a smartwatch — a convenience the Razr does not offer. On balance, neither phone dominates outright: the S25 Ultra edges ahead on raw capacity and reverse charging utility, while the Razr 60 Ultra counters decisively with faster wired and wireless charging speeds. Users who prioritize quick top-ups will favor the Razr; those who want maximum stamina and the ability to charge accessories will lean toward the S25 Ultra.

Neither phone includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, so wireless audio quality hinges entirely on Bluetooth codec support — and this is where the two devices diverge in a meaningful way. Both share a solid common foundation of aptX and aptX HD, covering high-quality wireless playback with compatible headphones. Beyond that baseline, however, each phone caters to a different wireless audio ecosystem. The Galaxy S25 Ultra supports LDAC, Sony's high-resolution codec capable of transmitting up to 990 kbps — the go-to standard for Sony headphones and a growing number of premium audio devices. The Razr 60 Ultra skips LDAC entirely but instead offers aptX Adaptive and aptX Lossless, Qualcomm's most advanced codecs, with aptX Lossless theoretically enabling CD-quality lossless transmission over Bluetooth when paired with compatible hardware.

In practice, your headphone choice determines which phone serves you better. LDAC is more widely supported across premium wireless headphones today, giving the S25 Ultra broader real-world compatibility for high-res audio. aptX Lossless, while technically impressive, requires both the source device and headphones to support it — compatible hardware remains relatively limited in the market.

Both phones offer stereo speakers and three microphones, so the playing field is level for speakerphone quality and voice capture. On wireless audio codec breadth, the Razr 60 Ultra holds a technical edge with its higher ceiling via aptX Lossless, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra's LDAC support makes it the more practically versatile choice for the majority of users with existing premium headphones today. This category is close, with the edge going to whichever ecosystem a user's headphones already belong to.

Wireless connectivity is effectively a draw — both phones support Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, 5G, and NFC, with identical peak download and upload speeds. The sensor suites are equally matched, and both support Galileo for enhanced GPS accuracy. The meaningful differences emerge in wired connectivity, SIM flexibility, and bundled accessories.

The Galaxy S25 Ultra holds a significant edge on USB 3.2 versus the Razr 60 Ultra's USB 2.0. In real terms, USB 3.2 enables data transfer speeds many times faster — critical for moving large video files, backing up storage, or using the phone as an external drive. The Razr's USB 2.0 is a notable bottleneck by comparison. The S25 Ultra also supports dual physical SIM plus dual eSIM, versus the Razr's single SIM and single eSIM setup — a practical advantage for users who juggle work and personal numbers or travel internationally with local SIMs. Additionally, the S25 Ultra includes a built-in stylus and supports ANT+, the latter enabling direct pairing with fitness equipment like gym machines and cycling sensors — a niche but genuine utility for fitness-oriented users.

The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a clear overall edge in this category. The USB 3.2 advantage alone is a tangible daily-use differentiator for anyone who regularly transfers data via cable, and the dual-SIM capability plus included stylus extend its lead further. The Razr 60 Ultra matches on wireless specs but falls behind on the wired and hardware feature front.

Across every spec in this group, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are identical — both include a video light, and neither features sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper display. There are no differentiators to analyze here.

This is a complete tie. Based strictly on the provided data, this group offers no basis for favoring one device over the other.