Motorola Razr 60 Ultra VS Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 are waterproof, with an IPX8 Ingress Protection (IP) rating, ensuring protection against water submersion for prolonged periods. However, their physical dimensions and weights differ slightly. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra weighs 199 g, while the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is lighter at 188 g. In terms of thickness, the Razr 60 Ultra measures 7.2 mm, while the Z Flip 7 is thinner at 6.5 mm. The Razr 60 Ultra is slightly wider at 74 mm, compared to the Z Flip 7's 75.2 mm, and also taller, measuring 171.5 mm, whereas the Z Flip 7 stands at 166.7 mm.

The volume of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is 91.3752 cm³, which is larger than the Galaxy Z Flip 7's 81.48296 cm³, reflecting the slight differences in size and form factor. Both devices can be folded, adding to their compactness when not in use.

In terms of design, both phones offer a similar water-resistant feature with folding capabilities, but the Razr 60 Ultra has a slightly larger footprint and weight compared to the Z Flip 7, though the difference is minimal in practical use.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Razr 60 Ultra has a slightly larger screen size of 7″ compared to the Z Flip 7’s 6.9″. The Motorola device also boasts a higher pixel density of 417 ppi, while the Z Flip 7 has a pixel density of 397 ppi, indicating a sharper display on the Razr 60 Ultra. In terms of resolution, the Razr 60 Ultra has a higher 1224 x 2912 px resolution, compared to the Z Flip 7’s 1080 x 2520 px, offering a more detailed display on the Motorola model.

The Razr 60 Ultra supports a faster refresh rate of 165Hz, while the Z Flip 7 is limited to 120Hz, meaning the Razr 60 Ultra should offer smoother scrolling and gaming experiences. Both devices support HDR10 and HDR10+, enhancing the visual experience for compatible content. Additionally, the Razr 60 Ultra includes branded damage-resistant glass, while the Z Flip 7 does not, offering an extra layer of durability for the Motorola device.

Both phones come with a secondary screen and feature touchscreens, ensuring functional, interactive displays. Overall, the Razr 60 Ultra offers a slightly superior display in terms of screen size, pixel density, resolution, refresh rate, and durability with branded damage-resistant glass.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 both feature powerful performance specs, but with some notable differences. The Razr 60 Ultra is equipped with 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, significantly higher than the Z Flip 7’s 512GB storage and 12GB RAM. This gives the Razr 60 Ultra a clear edge in storage and memory capacity. The Razr 60 Ultra also outperforms the Z Flip 7 in AnTuTu benchmark scores, achieving 1,831,212, compared to the Z Flip 7’s 1,513,343.

When it comes to the chipset, the Razr 60 Ultra uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Z Flip 7 is powered by the Samsung Exynos 2500. Both devices feature 64-bit architecture, support for multithreading, and utilize big.LITTLE technology. The Razr 60 Ultra has a higher CPU speed, with 2 x 4.32 GHz and 6 x 3.53 GHz cores, compared to the Z Flip 7’s 2 x 2.74 GHz, 5 x 2.36 GHz, 2 x 1.8 GHz, and 1 x 3.3 GHz configuration. The GPU clock speed is also higher on the Razr 60 Ultra at 1100 MHz, versus 1009 MHz on the Z Flip 7.

In terms of memory bandwidth, the Razr 60 Ultra has a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 85.1 GB/s, while the Z Flip 7 supports 64 GB/s. Both phones use DDR5 memory, and both are capable of handling up to 24GB of memory, although neither device has reached that limit. Other similarities include integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and support for DirectX 12, with both devices using HMP and having TrustZone for security. The Razr 60 Ultra has a slightly higher Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 8.2W, compared to the Z Flip 7’s 6W, indicating potentially more power consumption at peak loads.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 feature dual-lens main cameras, though their specifications differ slightly. The Razr 60 Ultra has a higher megapixel count on its main cameras, with a 50MP + 50MP setup, compared to the Z Flip 7's 50MP + 12MP configuration. Both devices have a wide aperture on their main cameras, but the Razr 60 Ultra has apertures of f/2 and f/1.8, while the Z Flip 7’s apertures are f/2.2 and f/1.8. Both phones offer features like phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus when recording, and support for slow-motion video recording, as well as built-in HDR and manual exposure controls.

The Razr 60 Ultra features a 50MP front camera, which is higher than the Z Flip 7’s 10MP front camera. Both front cameras have a wide aperture, with the Razr 60 Ultra's at f/2 and the Z Flip 7's at f/2.2. In terms of video recording, the Razr 60 Ultra supports a higher 4320p resolution at 30fps, while the Z Flip 7 is limited to 2160p at 60fps for its main camera. Both devices also include features like manual ISO, touch autofocus, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera.

Additional features such as optical image stabilization (OIS) are present on both devices, and neither phone has a front-facing LED flash. Both also support the timelapse function, have no BSI sensor, and lack laser autofocus and RGB LED flash. The Razr 60 Ultra does not shoot raw images, whereas the Z Flip 7 offers raw image capture, giving it an edge for users who prefer more post-processing flexibility. Overall, both phones offer robust camera setups, with the Razr 60 Ultra providing a higher resolution front camera and more powerful video recording capabilities, while the Z Flip 7 offers raw image support and slightly better video recording at 60fps.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 both run Android 15, offering a range of privacy, customization, and accessibility features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. They also share a number of useful features such as theme customization, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, and the ability to play games while they download. Additionally, both phones support dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health checks, and have an extra dim mode.

In terms of functionality, both phones allow app offloading, customizable notifications, and offer Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split-screen support. Neither device supports direct OS updates, and both phones have PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode. However, there are no differences between them in terms of their ability to be used as a PC, have sharing intents, or feature a child lock. Both phones also support widgets, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the tracking of the current position of the mobile device.

The only specification where there is a clear difference is in the availability of Quick Start, which is not present on either device. Overall, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 offer nearly identical operating systems with almost identical features and settings, making them both highly functional and privacy-conscious devices.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 have similar battery features, but with some differences in power and charging capabilities. The Razr 60 Ultra is equipped with a 4700 mAh battery, which is slightly larger than the 4300 mAh battery in the Z Flip 7. Both devices support wireless charging, with the Razr 60 Ultra offering faster wireless charging at 30W compared to the Z Flip 7's 15W. In terms of wired fast charging, the Razr 60 Ultra supports 68W charging speed, significantly faster than the Z Flip 7's 25W.

Both phones lack removable batteries and feature rechargeable batteries, with battery level indicators. The Razr 60 Ultra does not support reverse wireless charging, while the Z Flip 7 does, but at a slower reverse charging speed of 4.5W compared to the Razr 60 Ultra’s 5W. Both phones offer fast charging capabilities and wireless charging, making them efficient in terms of battery management.

Overall, the Razr 60 Ultra has a slightly larger battery and faster charging speeds, while the Z Flip 7 provides reverse wireless charging, offering a different set of charging features.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or Bluetooth audio solutions. Both devices come with stereo speakers for enhanced audio output. However, there is a key difference between the two in terms of Bluetooth audio support. The Razr 60 Ultra supports aptX, which can provide higher-quality wireless audio, while the Z Flip 7 does not support aptX. Neither device includes an FM radio, so users will not be able to listen to radio broadcasts directly from these phones.

In terms of audio features, both phones are fairly similar, with stereo speakers being the highlight. The Razr 60 Ultra has the edge with aptX support, making it a better option for users seeking improved audio quality through Bluetooth devices.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast mobile data speeds. When it comes to Wi-Fi support, both phones offer a similar range, supporting Wi-Fi 4, 5, 6, 6E, and 7. The Razr 60 Ultra has a slight edge in download speed, offering 10,000 MBit/s compared to the Z Flip 7's 9,640 MBit/s. In terms of upload speed, the Razr 60 Ultra also leads with 3,500 MBit/s, while the Z Flip 7 offers 2,550 MBit/s. Both devices have Bluetooth version 5.4, NFC support, USB Type-C, and similar GPS capabilities, including support for Galileo. Neither phone features an external memory slot or a stylus, and both have fingerprint scanners, accelerometers, barometers, gyroscopes, and compasses.

The Razr 60 Ultra supports USB version 2, while the Z Flip 7 supports the faster USB version 3.2. Both devices lack infrared sensors, heart rate monitors, motion tracking, optical tracking, and built-in projectors. They also do not support DLNA, 3D facial recognition, or iris scanning. Both phones have SIM support for 1 SIM and 1 eSIM, with no significant differences in this category.

Overall, while both phones offer similar core connectivity features, the Razr 60 Ultra has a slight advantage in download and upload speeds, as well as USB version. The Z Flip 7 stands out with its faster USB version and slightly more balanced connectivity speeds.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 come equipped with a video light, enhancing their ability to capture video in low-light environments. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, meaning they do not offer the added durability that sapphire glass can provide. Additionally, neither phone is equipped with an e-paper display, so users will not benefit from the unique properties of e-paper technology.

In summary, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 are identical in this group, sharing the same features, including the presence of a video light and the absence of sapphire glass and e-paper displays.