Motorola Razr 60 Ultra VS Xiaomi Mix Flip 2

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is waterproof, while the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 has no listed water resistance. Both devices weigh the same at 199 g, making them evenly matched in terms of heft.

In terms of thickness, the Razr 60 Ultra is slightly thinner at 7.2 mm compared to the Mix Flip 2's 7.6 mm. The width of the two devices is very close, with the Razr 60 Ultra measuring 74 mm and the Mix Flip 2 at 73.8 mm, making the difference almost negligible. The Razr 60 Ultra is taller at 171.5 mm, while the Mix Flip 2 stands at 166.9 mm.

The volume of the two phones also differs slightly: the Razr 60 Ultra has a volume of 91.3752 cm³, while the Mix Flip 2 has a larger volume of 93.610872 cm³. Both phones have a foldable design, but neither features a rugged build.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Razr 60 Ultra has a 7-inch screen, slightly larger than the Mix Flip 2's 6.86-inch display, offering a bit more screen real estate.

In terms of pixel density, the Mix Flip 2 takes the lead with 460 ppi, while the Razr 60 Ultra has a pixel density of 417 ppi, resulting in a sharper display on the Mix Flip 2. Both phones share the same screen resolution of 1224 x 2912 px, ensuring a high level of detail. The Razr 60 Ultra has a faster refresh rate of 165Hz, compared to the Mix Flip 2's 120Hz, which should provide smoother visuals on the Razr 60 Ultra.

The Razr 60 Ultra also offers branded damage-resistant glass, while the Mix Flip 2 does not, which may affect the durability of the screen. Both phones support HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, ensuring excellent dynamic range and color accuracy. The Razr 60 Ultra's secondary screen matches the main display resolution at 1224 x 2912 px, while the Mix Flip 2's secondary screen has a lower resolution of 1208 x 1392 px. Both devices feature touch screens, and both have a secondary display, but the Mix Flip 2 does not have branded damage-resistant glass.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 are equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, paired with the Adreno 830 GPU, ensuring top-tier performance. The CPU in both devices runs at 2 x 4.32 GHz and 6 x 3.53 GHz, offering powerful processing speeds. Both phones also feature 16GB of RAM with a speed of 5300 MHz, supported by DDR5 memory, and have the same maximum memory bandwidth of 85.1 GB/s.

Where the two differ significantly is in their Geekbench 6 results. The Razr 60 Ultra achieved a multi-core score of 6796 and a single-core score of 1753, while the Mix Flip 2 outperforms with a multi-core score of 10059 and a single-core score of 3234, indicating better raw performance on the Mix Flip 2 in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks.

Other specifications, such as the GPU clock speed of 1100 MHz, support for OpenGL versions 3.2 and 3.2 ES, and the use of big.LITTLE technology, are identical in both devices. They also share features like integrated LTE, multithreading, and thermal design power of 8.2W. The maximum supported memory in both is 24GB, and both phones feature 2 memory channels, integrated graphics, and support for ECC memory. The L2 and L3 cache sizes are also identical at 12 MB and 8 MB, respectively.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 feature dual-lens main cameras with 50 MP sensors, offering similar main camera specifications. However, the wide apertures of the lenses differ slightly: the Razr 60 Ultra has 2f and 1.8f apertures, while the Mix Flip 2 has 2.2f and 1.7f apertures. Both phones support video recording at 4320 x 30 fps, with the Mix Flip 2 offering an upgrade to 60 fps at the same resolution. Neither phone features a dual-tone LED flash, but both have a single flash LED.

For the front camera, the Razr 60 Ultra has a 50 MP sensor with a 2f aperture, while the Mix Flip 2 uses a 32 MP front camera, also with a 2f aperture. The Razr 60 Ultra supports features like HDR10 recording, while the Mix Flip 2 lacks HDR10 recording but does support Dolby Vision recording. Both phones have continuous autofocus for video, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and the ability to shoot in slow-motion and timelapse modes. Neither has a front-facing LED flash.

Both phones allow for in-camera panorama creation and support manual exposure, manual ISO, and touch autofocus. The Razr 60 Ultra offers phase-detection autofocus for photos, while the Mix Flip 2 has the same but with an additional optical zoom feature at 2x. Neither phone supports shooting 360° panoramas, raw photo formats, or 3D photo/video recording. Both devices also feature CMOS sensors, but neither has a BSI sensor or laser autofocus.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 run on Android 15, offering a similar set of operating system features. They both have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. Neither device includes Mail Privacy Protection, but both support theme customization, dark mode, and dynamic theming. They also allow blocking app tracking, have on-device machine learning, and support notification permissions and media pickers.

Both devices share additional features like the ability to play games while downloading, battery health checks, an extra dim mode, and customizable notifications. They also support Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen, and picture-in-picture (PiP) mode. Features like Wi-Fi password sharing and Quick Start are absent in both devices.

Both phones support offline voice recognition, voice commands, and tracking the current position of the device. They are multi-user systems and support widgets, sharing intents, and child locks. Additionally, both devices are free and open-source. Notably, neither phone provides direct OS updates, and neither can be used as a PC. Both phones offer similar privacy and security features and provide comparable functionality overall.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra features a 4700 mAh battery, while the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 is equipped with a larger 5165 mAh battery. Both devices support wireless charging, with the Razr 60 Ultra offering a wireless charging speed of 30W, while the Mix Flip 2 supports a faster 50W wireless charging speed. Both devices also support fast charging, with the Razr 60 Ultra capable of charging at 68W and the Mix Flip 2 at 67W, which are very close in speed.

Neither phone supports reverse wireless charging, and neither has a removable battery. Both devices have a battery level indicator and rechargeable batteries. Both phones also offer wireless charging functionality, ensuring convenience for users with compatible charging pads.

Overall, while the Mix Flip 2 has a slightly larger battery and faster wireless charging, the charging speeds for both devices are very similar, with only a 1W difference in fast charging and a 20W difference in wireless charging speed.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack socket, so users will need to rely on Bluetooth or USB-C audio solutions. Both devices feature stereo speakers for audio playback. The Razr 60 Ultra supports aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless, while the Mix Flip 2 also supports aptX, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, but it lacks support for aptX Lossless.

Neither phone supports LDAC, and neither has a built-in radio. Both devices offer robust wireless audio features, but the Razr 60 Ultra stands out with its additional aptX Lossless support, which the Mix Flip 2 does not include.

Overall, both phones provide similar audio capabilities with stereo speakers and a range of aptX technologies, but the Razr 60 Ultra has a slight advantage with the inclusion of aptX Lossless support.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 offer 5G support and share similar connectivity features. They both support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), ensuring compatibility with the latest Wi-Fi standards. Bluetooth 5.4, USB Type-C with version 2, and NFC are also present on both devices. The download speed for both phones is 10000 MBits/s, while the upload speed is 3500 MBits/s, making their data speeds identical.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra supports 1 SIM and 1 eSIM, while the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 supports 2 SIM cards. Both phones include a fingerprint scanner, GPS, compass, accelerometer, and barometer. Neither device has an external memory slot, infrared sensor, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, or a built-in projector. Both phones are also equipped with a gyroscope and a cellular module.

Additional features like emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, motion tracking, optical tracking, and a heart rate monitor are not available on either device. Both phones support Galileo for enhanced GPS capabilities. Overall, the two devices are quite similar in terms of connectivity and features, with the main difference being the Razr 60 Ultra’s support for 1 SIM and 1 eSIM, while the Mix Flip 2 supports 2 SIM cards.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 include a video light, making them suitable for low-light photography or video recording. Neither phone has sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper display, meaning both devices share similar display properties in this category.

Overall, these two phones are closely matched when it comes to miscellaneous features, with no significant differences in the display or additional special features between them.

In summary, both the Razr 60 Ultra and the Mix Flip 2 have a video light, but they lack other advanced display technologies such as sapphire glass, curved screens, or e-paper displays.