Motorola Razr 60 VS Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra share several design features, such as a waterproof build with an IPX8 rating and the ability to fold, making them durable and versatile devices. However, there are some minor differences in their physical dimensions and weight.

The Razr 60 is slightly lighter at 188 g, compared to the Razr 60 Ultra's 199 g. The thickness of the Razr 60 is 7.3 mm, while the Razr 60 Ultra is just a bit thinner at 7.2 mm. The width and height are nearly identical, with the Razr 60 measuring 74 mm in width and 171.3 mm in height, compared to the Razr 60 Ultra's 74 mm and 171.5 mm respectively, showing very little difference in size.

In terms of volume, the Razr 60 has a slightly larger volume at 92.53626 cm³, while the Razr 60 Ultra is a little more compact at 91.3752 cm³. Despite these small variances, both phones share a similar overall design ethos, focusing on portability and robust construction.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Razr 60 has a 6.9-inch screen, while the Razr 60 Ultra's display is slightly larger at 7 inches. The pixel density of the Razr 60 is 413 ppi, which is just slightly lower than the Razr 60 Ultra's 417 ppi, offering a marginal difference in sharpness.

In terms of resolution, the Razr 60 has a 1080 x 2640 px display, whereas the Razr 60 Ultra boasts a higher 1224 x 2912 px resolution, providing more detail on the screen. The refresh rate also differs, with the Razr 60 supporting 120Hz and the Razr 60 Ultra offering a smoother 165Hz, which may result in a noticeably more fluid experience during fast movements or scrolling.

Both devices support HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision for enhanced video quality, and feature branded damage-resistant glass. They also both have secondary screens, with the Razr 60 offering a 1056 x 1066 px resolution on its secondary display, while the Razr 60 Ultra has a secondary screen resolution of 1224 x 2912 px, matching its main display's specs. Lastly, both phones feature a touch screen and a touch sampling rate of 300Hz, ensuring a responsive experience.

The Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are equipped with powerful performance specs, though with some key differences. The Razr 60 features 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, while the Razr 60 Ultra comes with 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, offering significantly more storage and memory for handling large files and multitasking.

Both phones are powered by different chipsets. The Razr 60 uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, with CPU speeds of 4 x 2.6 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz, while the Razr 60 Ultra is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, boasting higher CPU speeds of 2 x 4.32 GHz and 6 x 3.53 GHz. The Razr 60 Ultra’s chipset is built with a smaller 3nm semiconductor, compared to the 4nm semiconductor on the Razr 60, potentially offering more efficiency and performance optimization.

In terms of GPU, the Razr 60 features the Mali G615 MC2 with a GPU clock speed of 1047 MHz, while the Razr 60 Ultra has the Adreno 830 with a higher GPU clock speed of 1100 MHz, suggesting the Ultra might deliver a slightly more powerful graphics experience. Both devices support DirectX 12, have integrated LTE, and are capable of handling up to two displays. The Razr 60 has a maximum memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, while the Razr 60 Ultra offers a significantly higher bandwidth of 85.1 GB/s. Lastly, both devices support DDR5 memory and use big.LITTLE technology for efficient task management, with the maximum supported memory for the Razr 60 being 16GB, while the Razr 60 Ultra supports up to 24GB.

The Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra both feature dual-lens main cameras, but with some differences in their specs. The Razr 60's main camera includes a 13 MP and 50 MP lens with apertures of f/2.2 and f/1.7, respectively, while the Razr 60 Ultra has a 50 MP dual-lens setup with f/2 and f/1.8 apertures. Both devices support phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus for video, and video recording at 2160 x 30 fps on the Razr 60 and a higher 4320 x 30 fps on the Razr 60 Ultra, offering slightly higher video resolution on the Ultra.

On the front, the Razr 60 has a 32 MP camera with a wide aperture of f/2.4, while the Razr 60 Ultra boasts a higher 50 MP front camera with a wider aperture of f/2. This suggests the Ultra might deliver sharper front-facing photos with more light capture. Neither device includes a front-facing LED flash, and both feature similar camera functions like HDR recording, Dolby Vision recording, and the ability to create in-camera panoramas. Both have a CMOS sensor, but neither has a BSI sensor.

Both phones include features like manual exposure, manual ISO, touch autofocus, and timelapse recording. Neither device supports raw shooting, and both support slow-motion video recording. The Razr 60 has pixel sizes of 0.8 µm and 1.12 µm for its main camera, whereas the Razr 60 Ultra has pixel sizes of 1 µm and 0.6 µm. These differences may impact the way light is captured in photos, but both phones offer robust camera features for everyday photography and video recording.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra run Android 15 and share a wide range of privacy and customization features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They also both support blocking app tracking and have on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, and customizable notifications. Additionally, both have dark mode, an extra dim mode, and dynamic theming for a personalized experience.

In terms of unique features, both phones support split screen, PiP (Picture in Picture), full-page screenshots, and widgets. They can also play games while they download and offer offline voice recognition and voice commands. Both devices can track the current position of the mobile device, support multi-user systems, and have a child lock. However, neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing or Quick Start, and neither has focus modes or cross-site tracking blocking.

One notable similarity is that neither the Razr 60 nor the Razr 60 Ultra receives direct OS updates. Both phones offer sharing intents, but neither can be used as a PC, and neither supports Mail Privacy Protection or a front-facing camera under the display. Overall, the operating system features on both phones are quite similar, with no major differences in the provided specs.

The Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra both come equipped with impressive battery specs, though with some key differences. The Razr 60 features a 4500 mAh battery, while the Razr 60 Ultra has a slightly larger 4700 mAh battery. Both phones support wireless charging, but the Razr 60 offers a wireless charging speed of 15W, whereas the Razr 60 Ultra provides a faster 30W wireless charging speed. In terms of wired charging, the Razr 60 supports 30W fast charging, while the Razr 60 Ultra supports a significantly faster 68W charging speed.

Neither phone offers reverse wireless charging, and both devices lack removable batteries. Both also feature a battery level indicator and have rechargeable batteries. Additionally, neither phone comes with a charger in the box.

Overall, while both phones offer solid battery features, the Razr 60 Ultra stands out with a larger battery capacity and much faster charging speeds, particularly in the wired charging department.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra offer similar audio features. Neither device has a 3.5 mm audio jack, but both come with stereo speakers, providing high-quality sound output. Both phones support aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless, ensuring compatibility with high-quality wireless audio streaming.

Neither device includes LDAC support or a radio. Both the Razr 60 and Razr 60 Ultra are equipped with three microphones, ensuring clear voice capture for calls and recording.

Overall, the audio capabilities of both phones are very similar, with no notable differences in the key features provided for sound quality and voice recording.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra offer solid connectivity options, with 5G support and NFC enabled on both devices. They also feature USB Type-C with USB version 2, Bluetooth version 5.4, and support for Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 6E. The Razr 60 Ultra stands out with the addition of Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), offering a future-proof connection option not found on the Razr 60.

Both phones are dual SIM, supporting 1 SIM and 1 eSIM, and have a fingerprint scanner for added security. They also include essential sensors such as a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass. The Razr 60 Ultra has the additional feature of a barometer, which the Razr 60 lacks.

Neither device supports features like 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, or a built-in projector. Both phones also lack an external memory slot, DLNA certification, and motion or optical tracking. Neither device supports emergency SOS via satellite or crash detection, and both have no infrared sensor or HDMI output. Overall, the connectivity and feature sets are very similar, with the Razr 60 Ultra offering a few extra features like Wi-Fi 7 support and a barometer.

Both the Motorola Razr 60 and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra feature a video light, making them capable of enhancing video recording in low-light conditions. However, neither device includes sapphire glass display protection, curved displays, or e-paper displays. These features are absent from both models, and there are no differences between them in this regard.

Overall, in the miscellaneous category, both the Razr 60 and Razr 60 Ultra offer the same set of features without any distinguishing factors.