MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X VS Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 AMP

The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 AMP are quite similar in their core specs, with a few key differences. Both cards have a GPU clock speed of 2280 MHz, but the Zotac card features a higher GPU turbo frequency of 2550 MHz compared to the MSI's 2497 MHz. This gives the Zotac model a slight edge in terms of turbo performance.

When it comes to pixel rate, the Zotac card again has a slight advantage, offering a pixel rate of 122.4 GPixel/s compared to the MSI's 119.9 GPixel/s. The floating-point performance is also higher on the Zotac, at 19.58 TFLOPS, versus the MSI's 19.18 TFLOPS. Both cards offer the same texture rate of 299.6 GTexels/s for the MSI and 306 GTexels/s for the Zotac.

In terms of GPU memory speed, both models are identical at 1750 MHz. Both cards have the same number of shading units (3840), texture mapping units (120), and render output units (48). Additionally, both products support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) operations.

The memory specifications for the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 AMP are identical across all key areas. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. Additionally, both models come equipped with 8GB of VRAM and use the GDDR7 memory type, ensuring high-speed data transfer and performance.

In terms of memory bus width, both the MSI and Zotac cards are configured with a 128-bit bus. This ensures similar data throughput capabilities on both models. Both also support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, providing increased reliability and stability.

Overall, the memory specifications are the same between the two products, with no significant differences to note in this category.

The features of the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 AMP are nearly identical. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3. Additionally, both models support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS, making them highly capable for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.

Neither card includes XeSS (XMX) support, but both support Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM is not supported). Both the MSI and Zotac models are also free from LHR (Lite Hash Rate) restrictions, which can impact mining performance.

On the aesthetic side, neither card features RGB lighting, and both can support up to four displays. Overall, the feature sets of the two products are virtually the same with no significant differences.

The port configurations of the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 AMP are identical. Both cards have one HDMI output, with an HDMI version of 2.1b. Additionally, both products feature three DisplayPort outputs, providing ample options for connecting multiple monitors.

Neither the MSI nor the Zotac card includes USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs. As a result, both models are equipped with the same set of display connections.

In summary, the port configurations on these two cards are identical, offering the same connectivity options for users.

The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 AMP share several key specifications in the general info category. Both cards are built on the Blackwell GPU architecture and use a 5 nm semiconductor size. They also have the same number of transistors, 21,900 million, and both feature a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 145W. Additionally, both models support PCIe version 5 and do not include air-water cooling solutions.

The main differences between the two products lie in their physical dimensions. The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X has a width of 197 mm and a height of 120 mm, while the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 AMP is slightly larger, with a width of 220.5 mm and a height of 120.25 mm.

Overall, the general specifications are largely the same, with the key distinction being the physical size, with the Zotac card being slightly larger than the MSI model.