MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming OC 16GB VS MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio 16GB

The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming OC 16GB and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio 16GB share a number of similarities in their performance specs, but there are a few key differences. Both cards have a GPU clock speed of 2407 MHz, with the Gaming Trio's GPU turbo speed at 2572 MHz, slightly lower than the Gaming OC's turbo of 2647 MHz. This indicates a small performance gap in turbo speed between the two models.

When it comes to pixel rate, the Gaming OC offers a higher value at 127.1 GPixel/s, compared to the Gaming Trio's 123.5 GPixel/s, meaning the Gaming OC is capable of processing more pixels per second. Similarly, the Gaming OC has a higher texture rate of 381.2 GTexels/s, while the Gaming Trio is rated at 370.4 GTexels/s.

Both models offer identical floating-point performance at 24.39 TFLOPS for the Gaming OC and 23.7 TFLOPS for the Gaming Trio. They also share the same shading units (4608), texture mapping units (144), and render output units (48), with both cards supporting Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP). GPU memory speed is the same at 1750 MHz for both products, with no additional distinctions in this category.

The memory specifications for the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming OC 16GB and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio 16GB are identical. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. They also come equipped with 16GB of VRAM, utilizing the GDDR7 memory type, and both have a memory bus width of 128-bit.

In terms of memory features, both the Gaming OC and Gaming Trio support ECC (Error Correction Code) memory, ensuring enhanced reliability for workloads requiring precise error handling.

As a result, in this memory category, there are no differences between the two products—they share the same memory performance and capabilities.

The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming OC 16GB and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio 16GB are identical in their feature set. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3.0, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs and modern applications. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, offering rich visual experiences.

Additionally, both cards are equipped with DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) support, enhancing performance in supported games. Neither card has XeSS (XMX) support, and both support Intel Resizable BAR for enhanced performance on compatible systems. Both models lack LHR (Low Hash Rate), meaning they are not restricted for cryptocurrency mining.

Both the Gaming OC and Gaming Trio feature RGB lighting and can support up to four displays, offering similar functionality and flexibility in display setups.

The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming OC 16GB and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio 16GB have identical port configurations. Both cards feature one HDMI output, with HDMI version 2.1b. They also both offer three DisplayPort outputs, but neither model includes USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

With this in mind, both models provide the same range of display connectivity, supporting a maximum of four displays across HDMI and DisplayPort outputs.

There are no differences between the two products in terms of available ports and connectivity options.

The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming OC 16GB and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio 16GB share the same GPU architecture, which is Blackwell, and both have a thermal design power (TDP) of 180W. Additionally, they use the same PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 and are built with a 5 nm semiconductor size, containing 21900 million transistors.

Both cards lack air-water cooling systems, ensuring a simpler cooling approach compared to hybrid solutions. However, they differ slightly in physical size. The Gaming OC is 247 mm in length and 135 mm in height, while the Gaming Trio is longer at 300 mm and slightly shorter in height at 125 mm.

These minor size differences aside, the general specifications for both products align closely across most categories, with no other significant contrasts in the core features provided.