MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

Overview

Welcome to our in-depth specification comparison between the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB, two Blackwell-architecture graphics cards built on a 5 nm process and sharing the same 8GB GDDR7 memory configuration. While both cards offer identical memory bandwidth and a rich feature set including ray tracing and DLSS, key battlegrounds emerge around raw compute performance, shader counts, texture throughput, and power consumption — differences that could meaningfully shape your buying decision.

Common Features

  • Both cards have a GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz.
  • Both cards have 48 render output units (ROPs).
  • Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) is supported on both cards.
  • Both cards have an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz.
  • Both cards offer a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • Both cards come with 8GB of VRAM.
  • Both cards use GDDR7 memory.
  • Both cards have a 128-bit memory bus width.
  • ECC memory is supported on both cards.
  • Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate.
  • Both cards support OpenGL version 4.6.
  • Both cards support OpenCL version 3.
  • Multi-display technology is supported on both cards.
  • Ray tracing is supported on both cards.
  • 3D technology is supported on both cards.
  • DLSS is supported on both cards.
  • XeSS (XMX) is not available on either card.
  • Both cards have one HDMI output running HDMI version 2.1b.
  • Both cards have three DisplayPort outputs.
  • Neither card has USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.
  • Both cards are built on the Blackwell GPU architecture.
  • Both cards use PCIe version 5.
  • Both cards are manufactured on a 5 nm process.
  • Both cards feature 21,900 million transistors.
  • Air-water cooling is not available on either card.

Main Differences

  • GPU clock speed is 2280 MHz on MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and 2410 MHz on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.
  • GPU turbo speed is 2527 MHz on MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and 2570 MHz on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.
  • Pixel rate is 121.3 GPixel/s on MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and 123.4 GPixel/s on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.
  • Floating-point performance is 19.41 TFLOPS on MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and 23.69 TFLOPS on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.
  • Texture rate is 303.2 GTexels/s on MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and 370.1 GTexels/s on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.
  • Shading units number 3840 on MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and 4608 on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.
  • Texture mapping units (TMUs) total 120 on MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and 144 on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP) is 145W on MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and 180W on Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.
Specs Comparison
MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC

MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

Performance:
GPU clock speed 2280 MHz 2410 MHz
GPU turbo 2527 MHz 2570 MHz
pixel rate 121.3 GPixel/s 123.4 GPixel/s
floating-point performance 19.41 TFLOPS 23.69 TFLOPS
texture rate 303.2 GTexels/s 370.1 GTexels/s
GPU memory speed 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
shading units 3840 4608
texture mapping units (TMUs) 120 144
render output units (ROPs) 48 48
Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)

The most telling performance gap between these two GPUs lies in their shader and compute resources. The RTX 5060 Ti 8GB packs 4608 shading units and 144 TMUs versus the MSI RTX 5060's 3840 shading units and 120 TMUs — a roughly 20% advantage in raw parallel processing hardware. This directly translates into the floating-point performance figures: the Ti delivers 23.69 TFLOPS compared to 19.41 TFLOPS on the MSI 5060, a gap of over 4 TFLOPS that has tangible implications for compute-heavy workloads like ray tracing, AI-assisted rendering, and shader-intensive scenes.

Clock speeds tell a more nuanced story. The Ti runs a higher base clock (2410 MHz vs 2280 MHz) and a slightly higher turbo (2570 MHz vs 2527 MHz), but the difference at boost is modest. Where the Ti truly pulls ahead is in texture throughput — 370.1 GTexels/s vs 303.2 GTexels/s — meaning it can sample and apply textures significantly faster per frame, which matters in high-resolution and texture-heavy titles. The pixel fill rate, however, is nearly identical (123.4 vs 121.3 GPixel/s), which makes sense since both GPUs share the same 48 ROPs and only differ marginally in boost clocks at this metric.

Both cards share the same 1750 MHz memory speed and both support Double Precision Floating Point, so neither has an edge on memory bandwidth or professional compute compatibility. Overall, the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB holds a clear and consistent performance advantage in this group, driven primarily by its larger shader array and higher compute throughput — the MSI RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC is the more restrained option that trades peak performance for what is likely a lower price tier.

Memory:
effective memory speed 28000 MHz 28000 MHz
maximum memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 448 GB/s
VRAM 8GB 8GB
GDDR version GDDR7 GDDR7
memory bus width 128-bit 128-bit
Supports ECC memory

On memory, these two GPUs are in complete lockstep. Both carry 8GB of GDDR7 VRAM across a 128-bit memory bus, running at an effective speed of 28000 MHz and delivering identical peak bandwidth of 448 GB/s. There is simply no differentiator to find here — every metric matches exactly.

That said, the shared specifications are worth contextualizing. GDDR7 is a meaningful generational step, and 448 GB/s of bandwidth is substantially higher than what GDDR6X delivered on comparable previous-generation cards, helping feed the GPU's shader arrays more efficiently and reducing bottlenecks in memory-intensive workloads. The 128-bit bus is the limiting architectural factor, and both cards live within the same constraint — meaning neither can overcome it to gain an edge in bandwidth-starved scenarios like high-resolution texture streaming.

Both cards also support ECC memory, which detects and corrects memory errors — a feature more relevant to professional and compute workloads than gaming. Its presence on both is a tie. In this group, the verdict is an absolute draw: memory configuration will not be a deciding factor between the MSI RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB.

Features:
DirectX version DirectX 12 Ultimate DirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 3 3
Supports multi-display technology
supports ray tracing
Supports 3D
supports DLSS
has XeSS (XMX)
AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR
has LHR
has RGB lighting
supported displays 4 4

Feature parity is total here — every single spec in this group matches identically across both cards. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is the current gold standard for gaming APIs, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, variable rate shading, and mesh shaders in supported titles. Alongside that, both carry OpenGL 4.6 and OpenCL 3, keeping them fully compatible with professional visualization and GPU compute workflows.

From a gaming feature standpoint, DLSS support and ray tracing are the headline capabilities, and neither card has an edge — both offer them. DLSS in particular is a meaningful asset, allowing AI-driven upscaling to recover performance lost to ray tracing or higher resolutions. Neither card supports XeSS, but that is an Intel-originated technology and its absence is expected on NVIDIA hardware. Both also support Intel Resizable BAR, which allows the CPU to access the full VRAM pool simultaneously rather than in chunks — a feature that can provide measurable frame rate gains in certain titles.

Multi-monitor users will find no difference either, as both cards top out at 4 supported displays. The conclusion for this group is straightforward: features offer zero differentiation between the MSI RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB. Buyers choosing between these two should look entirely to performance and other specification groups to make their decision.

Ports:
has an HDMI output
HDMI ports 1 1
HDMI version HDMI 2.1b HDMI 2.1b
DisplayPort outputs 3 3
USB-C ports 0 0
DVI outputs 0 0
mini DisplayPort outputs 0 0

Port configurations are identical across both cards, and the layout is a practical one: 1 HDMI 2.1b output paired with 3 DisplayPort outputs, totaling four display connections — which aligns with the maximum supported display count established in the Features group. Neither card offers USB-C or any legacy outputs like DVI or mini DisplayPort.

HDMI 2.1b is the current top-tier HDMI specification, supporting up to 4K at very high refresh rates and 8K output, making it well-suited for modern TVs and high-end monitors alike. The three DisplayPort outputs give users flexibility for multi-monitor desktop setups or daisy-chaining compatible displays. The absence of USB-C is worth noting for users who own USB-C or Thunderbolt monitors, as those would require an adapter.

This group is another clean tie — port selection will not factor into a decision between the MSI RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC and the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB. Both offer the same connectivity options, the same HDMI version, and the same total output count.

General info:
GPU architecture Blackwell Blackwell
release date May 2025 April 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 145W 180W
PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 5
semiconductor size 5 nm 5 nm
number of transistors 21900 million 21900 million
Has air-water cooling

Sharing the same Blackwell architecture, 5nm process node, and identical transistor count of 21.9 billion, these two GPUs are built on the same fundamental silicon foundation. The identical transistor count is a particularly interesting data point — it suggests both cards use the same die, with the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB simply enabling more of its resources, which explains the performance gap seen in the Performance group.

The one meaningful divergence here is power consumption. The RTX 5060 Ti 8GB carries a 180W TDP against the MSI RTX 5060's 145W TDP — a 35W difference that has real-world implications. A higher TDP means greater demands on your power supply unit and case airflow, more heat to dissipate, and potentially louder fan curves under sustained load. For small form factor builds or systems with tighter PSU headroom, the MSI RTX 5060's lower power envelope is a genuine advantage in this group.

Both cards use PCIe 5.0 and rely on air cooling exclusively. On balance, general info hands a practical edge to the MSI RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC for power efficiency — it draws notably less power from the same underlying silicon, which matters for heat-sensitive or power-constrained systems. The RTX 5060 Ti 8GB's higher TDP is the cost of unlocking those additional shaders and compute units.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After examining every specification, a clear picture emerges. The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB holds a decisive edge in raw compute power, delivering 23.69 TFLOPS of floating-point performance, 4608 shading units, and a texture rate of 370.1 GTexels/s — making it the stronger choice for demanding workloads and GPU-intensive gaming. The trade-off is a higher Thermal Design Power of 180W, requiring a more capable cooling and power setup. The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC, by contrast, keeps TDP at a more modest 145W, making it better suited for compact builds or systems with tighter power budgets, while still sharing the same memory subsystem, ports, and feature support. Both cards are equally matched on connectivity and software capabilities, so the decision ultimately comes down to performance headroom versus power efficiency.

MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC
Buy MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC if...

Buy the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X OC if you need a capable Blackwell GPU with a lower 145W TDP that fits comfortably into compact or power-constrained systems.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Buy Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB if...

Buy the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB if you want maximum compute throughput — with 23.69 TFLOPS, 4608 shading units, and a superior texture rate — and your system can accommodate its 180W power draw.