Ninebot by Segway eKickScooter Max G3 VS Ninebot by Segway KickScooter F3

Both the Ninebot by Segway eKickScooter Max G3 and the Ninebot by Segway KickScooter F3 share a strong foundation of design features: foldable frames, pneumatic tires, front and rear lighting, suspension, a companion smartphone app, and an IPX6 water resistance rating — meaning both can handle heavy rain and splashing without issue. Neither is designed for kids, and neither offers a seat, placing them squarely in the adult commuter/leisure category.

The most meaningful differentiator in this group is weight. The G3 tips the scales at 24,600 g compared to the F3's 18,600 g — a difference of 6 kg, which is substantial when carrying the scooter up stairs, loading it into a car trunk, or navigating tight spaces. The G3 is also physically larger, with a height of 1,299 mm and width of 1,218 mm versus the F3's 1,262 mm and 1,152 mm. On wheel size, the G3 runs 11″ wheels against the F3's 10″, which in practice can contribute to slightly smoother rolling over uneven surfaces — though both use pneumatic tires and suspension, which already absorb much of that difference.

For pure portability and ease of handling, the F3 has a clear edge in this group: it is meaningfully lighter and more compact while matching the G3 on every shared convenience and safety design feature. The G3's marginal gains in wheel diameter and physical stature may appeal to taller riders or those prioritizing ride feel on rough terrain, but as a design package, the F3 is the more manageable and transport-friendly option.

The performance gap between these two scooters is significant and shapes their entire use case. The Max G3 packs a 2000W motor capable of reaching 45 km/h, while the F3 runs a 1000W motor with a 25 km/h top speed — exactly half the power and well below the G3's ceiling. In practical terms, the G3 is built for riders who want brisk, confident acceleration and the ability to keep pace with urban traffic, whereas the F3 sits comfortably in the range of a regulated, lower-speed commuter scooter that may qualify for bike-lane use in many jurisdictions.

The hill-climbing figures reinforce this divide. A 30° climbing angle on the G3 means it handles steep urban inclines — think multi-story parking ramps or hilly city streets — with relative ease. The F3's 20° rating is respectable for a 1000W machine, but riders in hilly areas will notice the limitation. On weight capacity, the G3 supports up to 150 kg versus the F3's 120 kg, giving the G3 broader rider inclusivity and also headroom for carrying cargo without approaching its structural limits.

Both scooters share front and rear braking, which is the right setup for managing speed safely at either performance tier. That said, the G3 holds a commanding advantage across every performance metric in this group — power, speed, climb, and load capacity. It is unambiguously the higher-performance machine. The F3 is not weak for its class, but it is engineered for a different, more restricted riding profile.

Range figures tell only part of the battery story — charge time is where the G3 truly separates itself. The Max G3's 597 Wh pack delivers up to 80 km per charge and refills in just 3.5 hours, making a full overnight charge unnecessary and enabling a meaningful top-up during a lunch break. The F3, by contrast, carries a smaller 477 Wh battery that still achieves a competitive 70 km of range, but demands a lengthy 8 hours to charge fully — more than twice as long. For daily commuters, that difference in charge time can meaningfully affect whether the scooter is ready to go each morning.

The range gap of 10 km is real but moderate in practical terms; both scooters cover distances well beyond a typical urban commute. What stands out, however, is the G3's efficiency relative to its power output: despite running a motor twice as powerful as the F3's, it extracts greater range from a battery that is only about 25% larger. Both scooters share regenerative braking, which helps recover energy during deceleration and contributes to real-world range on stop-start routes. Neither offers a removable battery, so charging is always tethered to a power outlet.

Across this group, the G3 holds a clear advantage — it offers more range, a substantially larger battery, and a charge time that is less than half that of the F3. The F3's 70 km range is adequate, but the 8-hour charge cycle is a genuine daily inconvenience that riders should weigh carefully before committing.