Ninebot by Segway KickScooter F3 Pro VS Segway SuperScooter GT3

Both the Ninebot by Segway KickScooter F3 Pro and the Segway SuperScooter GT3 share a strong foundation of practical design features: both fold for storage, ride on pneumatic tires with suspension, carry front and rear lights, and hold an IPX6 water-resistance rating — meaning neither is fazed by heavy rain or splashing water. Neither is designed for kids, and both pair with a dedicated smartphone app. At this level, they are evenly matched on safety and convenience essentials.

Where the two diverge significantly is in physical scale. The GT3 is substantially larger, standing 1388 mm tall and 1360 mm wide versus the F3 Pro's 1262 mm height and 1152 mm width. More striking is the weight gap: the GT3 tips the scales at 39,500 g — more than double the F3 Pro's 19,300 g. Even folded, the GT3 is a two-handed, commit-to-carrying proposition, while the F3 Pro remains manageable for most adults navigating stairs, public transit, or tight storage. The GT3 also runs slightly larger 11″ wheels compared to the F3 Pro's 10″, which can contribute to a smoother roll over uneven surfaces but adds to the overall bulk.

On design, the F3 Pro has a clear practical edge for users who prioritize portability and everyday handling. The GT3's greater mass and dimensions are clearly the trade-off of a machine built for more demanding performance use cases — its heft is a design consequence, not an oversight. If compactness and ease of transport matter, the F3 Pro wins this group outright; if you rarely need to carry the scooter and want the larger platform, the GT3's size becomes a non-issue.

The performance gap between these two scooters is substantial and deliberate. The SuperScooter GT3 packs a 2400W motor — exactly double the F3 Pro's 1200W — and that difference translates directly into a top speed of 50 km/h versus 25 km/h. In practical terms, the GT3 can keep pace with urban traffic on arterial roads, while the F3 Pro is calibrated for bike-lane and last-mile use. Notably, neither uses dual motors despite their power outputs, meaning both route all that wattage through a single drivetrain.

Hill-climbing tells a similar story. The GT3's 30° climbing angle versus the F3 Pro's 24° means the GT3 handles steep inclines with meaningfully more confidence — a 30° grade is roughly a 58% slope, the kind found on aggressive urban hills or off-road terrain, whereas 24° already covers most real-world city inclines comfortably. The GT3 also supports a higher rider weight capacity of 150 kg compared to 120 kg, broadening its usable audience. Both scooters are equipped with front and rear brakes, so stopping hardware is evenly matched regardless of the speed differential.

On performance, the GT3 holds a decisive advantage across every measurable dimension — power, speed, gradient capability, and payload. The F3 Pro is not underpowered for its intended role, but users seeking genuine speed or tackling challenging terrain will find the GT3 operates in an entirely different performance tier.

The most striking detail in this battery comparison is not the range figures — it's the efficiency story behind them. The SuperScooter GT3 carries a substantially larger 899 Wh battery versus the F3 Pro's 477 Wh, yet both arrive at nearly identical maximum ranges of 72 km and 70 km respectively. That means the GT3 consumes almost twice the energy to travel roughly the same distance — a direct consequence of its greater weight and higher-performance motor working harder at speed. The F3 Pro extracts far more range per watt-hour, making it the more energy-efficient machine by a significant margin.

Charging dynamics add another layer to this picture. Despite its much larger pack, the GT3 actually reaches a full charge in 6.5 hours — faster than the F3 Pro's 8 hours — implying a higher-output charger is included. For users who charge overnight, both are perfectly workable, but the GT3's quicker turnaround is a genuine convenience advantage for those fitting in mid-day top-ups. Neither scooter offers a removable battery, so charging always means access to a power outlet near where the scooter is parked.

This group is genuinely nuanced: the F3 Pro wins on efficiency, squeezing comparable real-world range from a pack half the size, while the GT3 charges faster and carries the headroom to sustain high-speed riding without the deep discharge cycles that degrade cells faster over time. For most commuters, the F3 Pro's battery is the smarter, leaner package; for performance-oriented riders already committed to the GT3's weight class, the larger pack is a necessary foundation rather than a luxury.