Ninebot by Segway KickScooter F3 VS Ninebot by Segway KickScooter F3 Pro

From a design standpoint, the Ninebot by Segway KickScooter F3 and F3 Pro are remarkably similar — sharing identical dimensions (1262 mm height, 1152 mm width, 10″ wheels), the same foldable form factor, suspension, pneumatic tires, front and rear lighting, app connectivity, and an IPX6 water resistance rating. This means both scooters offer the same physical footprint, the same ride-comfort features, and the same level of weather protection in real-world use.

The only measurable design difference is weight: the F3 comes in at 18,600 g (~18.6 kg) versus the F3 Pro's 19,300 g (~19.3 kg) — a gap of just 700 g. In practical terms, this difference is barely perceptible when riding, but can matter slightly when carrying the scooter up stairs or lifting it into a car trunk. Neither model includes a seat, and neither is designed for children, keeping both firmly in the adult commuter category.

On design alone, these two scooters are essentially tied. The F3 holds a marginal edge due to its slightly lower weight, which marginally improves portability, but the difference is too small to be a deciding factor for most users. Anyone choosing between the two should look beyond design specs to performance and battery data for meaningful differentiation.

Both scooters share a 25 km/h top speed, identical braking setups (front and rear), and a 120 kg maximum load capacity — so day-to-day commuting at flat speeds feels essentially the same on either model. The real performance divergence emerges when the terrain gets demanding.

The F3 Pro's 1200W motor versus the F3's 1000W unit is a 20% power increase that directly translates to hill-climbing ability: the F3 Pro handles gradients up to 24° compared to the F3's 20°. In practical terms, a 20° incline is already moderately steep — think a challenging urban hill — while 24° pushes into genuinely steep territory. For riders in hilly cities or areas with sharp ramps, this gap is meaningful. The extra motor power also typically means the F3 Pro sustains its top speed more confidently under load or on inclines, even if the stated maximum speed is identical on paper.

For performance, the F3 Pro holds a clear edge. Riders on flat terrain may never notice the difference, but anyone navigating elevation changes regularly will benefit tangibly from the stronger motor and steeper climb rating. The F3 remains competent, but the F3 Pro is the more capable machine where it counts.

Battery is the one category where there is absolutely nothing to separate these two scooters. Both pack an identical 477 Wh battery, deliver the same claimed 70 km range per charge, and replenish fully in 8 hours — a full overnight charge cycle. The 477 Wh capacity is genuinely substantial for the scooter segment, making a 70 km ceiling credible under favorable conditions, though real-world range will vary with rider weight, speed, and terrain.

Worth noting is that both models include regenerative braking, which recovers a small amount of energy during deceleration and can modestly extend range in stop-and-go urban environments. Neither scooter offers a removable battery, meaning charging must be done with the unit stationary and plugged in — a practical consideration for riders without easy outlet access near their parking spot.

This category is a complete tie. Interestingly, the F3 Pro's stronger motor does not come at the cost of range — both scooters claim the same 70 km on the same battery. This makes the F3 Pro look particularly efficient on paper, though the provided specs offer no further detail to explain why. Either way, battery should play no role in the decision between these two models.