OnePlus Pad 3 VS ZTE RedMagic Astra

The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra have some notable differences in design specifications. In terms of weight, the OnePlus Pad 3 is heavier at 675 g, compared to the ZTE RedMagic Astra’s lighter 370 g. Both devices are similar in thickness, with the OnePlus Pad 3 measuring 6 mm and the ZTE RedMagic Astra slightly thicker at 6.9 mm.

When it comes to dimensions, the OnePlus Pad 3 is significantly larger, with a width of 289.6 mm and a height of 209.7 mm, giving it a larger volume of 364.37 cm³. In contrast, the ZTE RedMagic Astra is much more compact, with a width of 207 mm, height of 134.2 mm, and a smaller volume of 191.68 cm³.

In terms of additional features, the OnePlus Pad 3 comes with a stylus, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra does not. Neither device includes a detachable or backlit keyboard. The OnePlus Pad 3 also lacks water resistance, whereas the ZTE RedMagic Astra is water resistant. Neither product offers tilt sensitivity.

The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra feature different display specifications. The OnePlus Pad 3 has a larger 13.2″ screen with a resolution of 3392 x 2400 px, which gives it a pixel density of 315 ppi. In comparison, the ZTE RedMagic Astra has a smaller 9.06″ screen with a resolution of 2400 x 1504 px, resulting in a pixel density of 313 ppi. Both displays have similar pixel density values, but the OnePlus Pad 3 offers a larger and higher-resolution display overall.

The display types differ as well; the OnePlus Pad 3 uses an LCD, IPS display, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra features an OLED/AMOLED display. The OnePlus Pad 3 supports a 144Hz refresh rate and a 144Hz touch sampling rate, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra supports a higher refresh rate of 165Hz and a touch sampling rate of 240Hz. This means the ZTE RedMagic Astra may offer a slightly smoother touch experience and refresh rate.

In terms of brightness, the OnePlus Pad 3 has a typical brightness of 500 nits, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra offers a much brighter 1100 nits. The OnePlus Pad 3 includes an anti-reflection coating, but the ZTE RedMagic Astra does not. Neither device supports HDR10 or HDR10+, though the OnePlus Pad 3 does support Dolby Vision, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra does not. The OnePlus Pad 3 does not have branded damage-resistant glass or a sapphire glass display, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra includes branded damage-resistant glass but lacks both sapphire glass and an anti-reflection coating.

The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra share many similar performance specifications, with both featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and the Adreno 830 GPU. Both devices have the same CPU configuration, with 2 cores running at 4.32 GHz and 6 cores at 3.53 GHz, and they both support big.LITTLE technology. The Geekbench 6 results are also identical for both devices, with a multi-core score of 10059 and a single-core score of 3234.

However, the two products differ in terms of storage and RAM. The OnePlus Pad 3 offers 512GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra doubles both, with 1024GB of internal storage and 24GB of RAM. Despite these differences, both devices feature the same RAM speed of 5300 MHz.

Other specifications are identical across both devices, including the use of 64-bit architecture, integrated LTE support, GPU clock speed of 1100 MHz, and 8 CPU threads. Both devices also have an Android 15 operating system, support for ECC memory, a maximum memory bandwidth of 85.1 GB/s, and similar cache configurations (L1 cache: 192 KB, L2 cache: 12 MB, L3 cache: 8 MB). The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra also have similar thermal design power (TDP) of 8.2W and support for OpenGL 3.2, OpenGL ES 3.2, and DirectX 12.

The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra both feature a 13 MP main camera with 2160 x 30 fps video recording, though the ZTE RedMagic Astra has a slightly higher 9 MP front camera compared to the 8 MP front camera of the OnePlus Pad 3. Both devices include a flash, but neither has a front-facing LED flash. Additionally, both offer manual controls such as white balance, ISO, focus, and exposure adjustments, but neither has manual shutter speed options.

In terms of other camera features, both the OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra support a built-in HDR mode, continuous autofocus when recording movies, and have a CMOS sensor. However, the OnePlus Pad 3 does not support panorama creation in-camera, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra can create panoramas. The ZTE RedMagic Astra also supports slow-motion video recording, a feature not available on the OnePlus Pad 3.

Neither device has built-in optical image stabilization, 3D photo/video recording capabilities, or a dual-tone LED flash. Both devices also lack HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, and 360° panorama shooting. The number of flash LEDs is the same for both products, with 1 LED each. Lastly, both products have a video light but do not support serial shot mode or have an RGB LED flash.

The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra have similar audio features with a few key differences. Both devices are equipped with stereo speakers, but neither includes a 3.5 mm audio jack socket. Additionally, both devices lack a radio feature.

In terms of Bluetooth audio support, the OnePlus Pad 3 supports aptX HD, while the ZTE RedMagic Astra does not have support for any aptX audio codecs, including aptX, aptX HD, aptX Low Latency, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. Neither device supports LDAC.

The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra both feature rechargeable batteries with a battery level indicator. However, the OnePlus Pad 3 has a significantly larger battery capacity at 12140 mAh, compared to the ZTE RedMagic Astra’s 8200 mAh. Both devices support fast charging and do not have wireless charging capabilities. Neither device has a removable battery.

Overall, the OnePlus Pad 3 offers a higher battery capacity, while both devices share similar features regarding battery rechargeability and fast charging support.

The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra offer a similar set of connectivity and features, though there are a few key differences. Both support Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), but the OnePlus Pad 3 also includes support for the upcoming Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), which the ZTE RedMagic Astra does not have. Both devices have USB Type-C ports, support Bluetooth 5.4, and use the same USB version (3.2). Their download and upload speeds are identical, both offering 10000 MBit/s and 3500 MBit/s, respectively.

When it comes to privacy and security features, both devices have on-device machine learning, clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. They can block app tracking and have the ability to customize notifications, but neither device blocks cross-site tracking. Both support features like split screen, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and dynamic theming, as well as dark mode and battery health checks.

One difference between the two is that the OnePlus Pad 3 supports tracking the current position of a mobile device, while this is not explicitly mentioned for the ZTE RedMagic Astra. Additionally, the ZTE RedMagic Astra has a fingerprint scanner, while the OnePlus Pad 3 does not. Neither device includes 5G support, NFC, or an HDMI output, and both have child lock features. Both devices also support voice commands, have a gyroscope and accelerometer, and feature offline voice recognition, but neither supports 3D facial recognition, has a barometer, or has a built-in projector.

The OnePlus Pad 3 and ZTE RedMagic Astra both feature DDR5 memory and support multithreading. These specifications are identical for both devices, meaning both devices offer similar memory performance and can handle multiple tasks simultaneously with efficiency.