Oppo A6 Pro 5G VS Vivo V60 Lite 5G

Both the Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G are water-resistant, with the Oppo A6 Pro 5G boasting an IP68 rating, meaning it is more resistant to dust and can withstand being submerged in water for longer periods compared to the Vivo V60 Lite 5G, which has an IP65 rating for splash resistance. In terms of size, the Oppo A6 Pro 5G measures 158.2 mm in height, 75 mm in width, and has a thickness of 8 mm, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G is slightly taller at 163.8 mm, slightly wider at 76.3 mm, and thinner at 7.6 mm. This gives the Vivo V60 Lite 5G a more compact and thinner profile, but with a weight of 194 g compared to the Oppo A6 Pro 5G's 185 g, the Vivo device is marginally heavier.

The volume of the two phones is very similar, with the Oppo A6 Pro 5G having a volume of 94.92 cm³ and the Vivo V60 Lite 5G at 94.98 cm³, meaning the difference in overall size is negligible. Neither phone has a rugged build or can be folded, indicating that both devices are standard in design, without any particular focus on extreme durability or flexibility.

Overall, both phones share some key design elements like water resistance, but the Vivo V60 Lite 5G is slightly more compact and thinner, while the Oppo A6 Pro 5G has a slightly better water resistance rating and a marginally lighter weight.

The Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The Oppo A6 Pro 5G has a 6.57″ screen, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G is slightly larger at 6.77″. This makes the Vivo display a bit more expansive, but both devices share the same 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and responsiveness.

When it comes to pixel density, the Oppo A6 Pro 5G has a slightly higher figure at 397 ppi, compared to the Vivo V60 Lite 5G's 388 ppi. In terms of resolution, the Oppo has a 1080 x 2372 px display, while the Vivo features a 1080 x 2392 px display, offering a marginally higher vertical resolution. Despite these differences, the resolutions are very close, so visual quality should be similar on both devices.

The Oppo A6 Pro 5G comes with branded damage-resistant glass, adding a layer of protection to the screen, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G does not offer this feature. Additionally, the Vivo V60 Lite 5G supports HDR10 and HDR10+, which the Oppo A6 Pro 5G does not. However, neither phone supports Dolby Vision or has an Always-On Display. Both displays also feature touch support, and neither device has a secondary screen.

Both the Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G come with 256GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, offering ample space and memory for multitasking and storage needs. However, the two devices differ in terms of performance components. The Oppo A6 Pro 5G is powered by the MediaTek Helio G100 chipset, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G features the newer MediaTek Dimensity 7300. The Dimensity 7300 is based on a 4 nm process, compared to the 6 nm process of the Helio G100, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process in the Vivo device.

The CPU configurations also differ slightly. The Oppo A6 Pro 5G has 2 high-performance cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 efficiency cores at 2 GHz, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a more balanced 4 high-performance cores at 2.5 GHz and 4 efficiency cores at 2 GHz. In terms of benchmarking, the Vivo V60 Lite 5G outperforms the Oppo A6 Pro 5G with a Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 2932 compared to the Oppo's 2012, and a single-core score of 1026 compared to the Oppo's 782, indicating higher overall processing power.

Both devices feature ARM Mali GPUs, with the Oppo A6 Pro 5G using the Mali-G57 MC2 and the Vivo V60 Lite 5G using the Mali G615 MC2. The GPU clock speed is higher on the Vivo device, at 1047 MHz compared to the Oppo's 950 MHz, which may translate to slightly better graphics performance on the Vivo. Additionally, the Vivo V60 Lite 5G supports RAM speeds of 6400 MHz, which is significantly faster than the 2133 MHz speed of the Oppo A6 Pro 5G. The Vivo device also supports up to 16GB of RAM, while the Oppo is limited to 12GB. Both phones support 64-bit processing, DirectX 12, integrated LTE, big.LITTLE technology, HMP, and integrated graphics.

The Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G both offer dual-lens main cameras, but with slightly different configurations. The Oppo A6 Pro 5G features a 50 MP primary sensor paired with a 2 MP secondary sensor, and a wide aperture of f/2.4 and f/1.8 respectively. In contrast, the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a 50 MP primary sensor with an 8 MP secondary lens, and a wide aperture of f/2.2 and f/1.8. While both devices use a 50 MP main camera, the Vivo offers a higher megapixel secondary camera. The video recording capabilities of the main cameras also differ; the Oppo A6 Pro 5G supports 4K (2160p) at 30 fps, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G is limited to 1080p at 30 fps.

For the front camera, the Oppo A6 Pro 5G is equipped with a 16 MP sensor, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G features a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The Oppo has a wider aperture of f/2.4, while the Vivo’s front camera has a slightly narrower f/2.5 aperture. Both phones offer features like phase-detection autofocus, touch autofocus, and manual exposure control. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash or a dual-lens front camera.

Additional features such as image stabilization are present in the Oppo A6 Pro 5G with built-in optical image stabilization (OIS) for the main camera, but this is absent in the Vivo V60 Lite 5G. Both devices support features like continuous autofocus when recording movies, HDR modes, and manual ISO, but the Vivo does not support slow-motion or timelapse recording, unlike the Oppo A6 Pro 5G. Both phones can create panoramas in-camera, but neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision video recording.

Both the Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G run on Android 15, offering similar software features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They also support features like dark mode, battery health checks, Wi-Fi password sharing, and offloading apps. Both phones allow playing games while downloading, support media picker, and have notification permissions, customizable notifications, and voice commands. They also include Live Text, full-page screenshots, PiP (Picture in Picture), and the ability to track the device’s current position.

On the privacy front, both devices allow blocking app tracking, but neither blocks cross-site tracking. Both phones support on-device machine learning, notification permissions, and a multi-user system. Neither phone offers focus modes, Quick Start, or Wi-Fi password sharing. Additionally, both phones support widgets, sharing intents, and have a child lock feature. They also have offline voice recognition and are free and open-source.

The key difference between the two devices is the same: neither phone receives direct OS updates, which means updates will likely be delivered through traditional methods rather than directly via the operating system.

The Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G both come with large batteries, but with slight differences in capacity and charging speed. The Oppo A6 Pro 5G features a 7000 mAh battery, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a slightly smaller 6500 mAh battery. Despite the difference in battery size, both devices support fast charging, with the Oppo supporting 80W charging speed and the Vivo supporting a slightly faster 90W charging speed. Neither phone offers wireless charging or reverse wireless charging.

Both phones have non-removable, rechargeable batteries and include a battery level indicator, allowing users to monitor the remaining charge. Both devices also share the same feature of not having a removable battery, meaning they are built for long-term use without easy battery replacement.

In terms of raw power, the Oppo A6 Pro 5G offers a slightly larger battery capacity, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G offers faster charging speeds. Both phones are designed to provide solid battery performance for their users.

Both the Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. Both devices feature stereo speakers, ensuring good sound output, but they differ in their support for audio codecs. The Oppo A6 Pro 5G supports aptX, aptX HD, but not LDAC or aptX Adaptive. In contrast, the Vivo V60 Lite 5G does not support aptX, aptX HD, or aptX Adaptive, and neither device supports aptX Lossless or LDAC.

Neither phone has a radio, so users will need to rely on streaming services or other means for radio listening.

Overall, the Oppo A6 Pro 5G offers more advanced Bluetooth audio codec support with aptX and aptX HD, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G lacks this capability, focusing on more basic audio standards.

Both the Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G support 5G connectivity and share similar connectivity features. Both devices support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and offer dual SIM card slots. The Bluetooth version is the same, with both phones using Bluetooth 5.4. Additionally, both phones have NFC, USB Type-C (version 2), and a fingerprint scanner. Neither device has an external memory slot or supports wireless features like infrared sensors or HDMI output.

In terms of download speed, the Oppo A6 Pro 5G has a slightly higher maximum download speed of 3300 Mbits/s compared to the Vivo V60 Lite 5G's 3270 Mbits/s. Both phones are equipped with a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, compass, and cellular modules. They also support Galileo, but neither supports ANT+ or includes a heart rate monitor. Neither device has a barometer, a built-in projector, or motion/optical tracking.

Both phones lack features like emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, 3D facial recognition, and iris scanning. They also do not include a stylus or any other advanced biometric sensors beyond the fingerprint scanner.

Both the Oppo A6 Pro 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G include a video light, which can help improve lighting for videos and photos. Neither phone features a sapphire glass display, a curved display, or an e-paper display, meaning both devices have traditional flat displays without the enhanced durability or unique characteristics of these other display types.

In summary, both phones share similar features in this category, with no significant differences in their display technologies or additional display features.