Oppo Enco Free 4 VS Vivo TWS 5

Both the Oppo Enco Free 4 and Vivo TWS 5 are in-ear wireless earbuds, but their design features show some differences. The Oppo Enco Free 4 weighs slightly less at 9.4 g, while the Vivo TWS 5 is marginally heavier at 9.6 g. Neither has wires or cables, and both are not neckband-style earbuds. Both also include stereo speakers, but there are no RGB lighting or UV light features on either model, and neither has a display.

In terms of water protection, the Oppo Enco Free 4 offers a higher Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP55, making it more resistant to water and dust compared to the Vivo TWS 5, which has a lower IP54 rating. The Vivo model is sweat-resistant, while the Oppo model is simply described as water-resistant, which may imply it offers more general protection against moisture.

Neither product includes wingtips, and both are designed to be wire-free and portable, catering to users who prefer lightweight and simple designs. Overall, while both models share many design similarities, the Oppo Enco Free 4 has an edge in terms of water resistance due to its higher IP rating.

When it comes to sound quality, both the Oppo Enco Free 4 and Vivo TWS 5 offer similar features. Both models support active noise cancellation (ANC) and passive noise reduction, helping to block out unwanted noise. They also share the same driver unit size of 11 mm, which is typically a good indicator of sound output quality.

In terms of frequency range, both earbuds are capable of delivering sound from 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, so there is no difference in their bass and treble range. Neither supports Dolby Atmos or Dirac Virtuo, meaning they both lack advanced sound enhancement technologies like those found in some other high-end earbuds.

The main difference between the two models lies in spatial audio support. The Vivo TWS 5 does support spatial audio, providing a more immersive sound experience, while the Oppo Enco Free 4 does not offer this feature. Neither model features a neodymium magnet, which is often used to enhance sound quality, but this is not included in either product.

When comparing the power specifications of the Oppo Enco Free 4 and Vivo TWS 5, there are some key differences in battery life and charging time. The Oppo Enco Free 4 offers a battery life of 11 hours for the earbuds themselves, with a total of 34 hours of playtime when including the charging case. In contrast, the Vivo TWS 5 provides slightly longer battery life, with 12 hours for the earbuds and 36 hours with the charging case.

Both models offer 6 hours of battery life with active noise cancellation (ANC) turned on. However, the charge time differs significantly: the Oppo Enco Free 4 has a much faster charge time of just 0.85 hours, while the Vivo TWS 5 takes 2 hours to fully charge.

In terms of battery power, the Oppo Enco Free 4 features a 62 mAh battery, while the Vivo TWS 5 has a slightly smaller 54 mAh battery. Both models include a battery level indicator and feature rechargeable batteries, but neither supports wireless charging or solar power.

In terms of connectivity, both the Oppo Enco Free 4 and Vivo TWS 5 share some similar features, with both using USB Type-C for charging, Bluetooth version 5.4, and AAC support for high-quality audio streaming. They can also be used wirelessly, and neither supports Bluetooth pairing via NFC.

While both models support LDHC (Low Latency High Definition Codec), the Oppo Enco Free 4 supports LDAC, whereas the Vivo TWS 5 does not. This means the Oppo model may offer better support for high-resolution audio streaming when paired with compatible devices. However, the Vivo TWS 5 has a more limited Bluetooth range of 10 meters, while the Oppo Enco Free 4 offers a maximum Bluetooth range of 40 meters, which could provide more flexibility when using the earbuds at a distance from the connected device.

Neither model includes support for fast pairing or Bluetooth LE Audio, and both lack support for any of the aptX codecs, such as aptX Adaptive, aptX Low Latency, or aptX HD. Additionally, both models do not feature Auracast support.

Both the Oppo Enco Free 4 and Vivo TWS 5 offer a similar set of features, including ambient sound mode, fast charging support, a mute function, the ability to be used as a headset, and voice prompts. Both also include a travel bag for convenience and have a control panel placed on a device, not on the earbuds themselves. Additionally, neither model features in/on-ear detection, a temperature sensor, or a built-in camera remote control function.

The Oppo Enco Free 4 stands out with a built-in translator, which the Vivo TWS 5 lacks. However, the Vivo model can perform all the other features present in the Oppo model, including fast charging, the mute function, and the headset capability.

In terms of notifications, neither model can read them, and both have the same limitations when it comes to control and sensor functionality. The overall set of features between these two models is very similar, with the main distinction being the Oppo Enco Free 4’s built-in translator.

Both the Oppo Enco Free 4 and Vivo TWS 5 are equipped with a noise-canceling microphone. This means that both models are designed to reduce background noise during calls or voice commands, helping to improve the clarity of your voice in noisy environments.

There is no difference between the two products in this category, as both feature the same noise-canceling microphone technology.

Overall, users can expect similar performance in microphone quality from both the Oppo Enco Free 4 and Vivo TWS 5, with the added benefit of noise cancellation in both models.