Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G VS Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

The Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G offers a waterproof design with an IP68 rating, providing better water resistance compared to the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, which is only water resistant with an IP54 rating. The Oppo phone also has a slightly higher weight at 204 g, compared to the A17's 192 g. In terms of size, the F31 Pro Plus is marginally taller, with a height of 163.1 mm, while the A17 measures 164.4 mm in height. The thickness of both devices is very close, with the Oppo at 7.7 mm and the A17 at 7.5 mm, making them almost identical in this regard.

When it comes to width, the Oppo is 77.6 mm wide, while the Samsung is just slightly wider at 77.9 mm. The difference in volume is minimal, with the Oppo having a volume of 97.46 cm³ and the A17 being slightly smaller at 96.05 cm³. Both devices do not feature a rugged build and cannot be folded, offering a more traditional smartphone design.

Overall, the differences in size and weight between the two phones are small, but the Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G stands out for its higher water resistance rating (IP68) compared to the Samsung Galaxy A17's IP54 rating.

Both the Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G feature OLED/AMOLED displays, which offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Oppo F31 Pro Plus has a larger 6.8″ screen, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 comes with a slightly smaller 6.7″ display. In terms of pixel density, the Oppo leads with 453 ppi compared to the A17's 385 ppi, providing a sharper display on the Oppo. The resolution of the Oppo is 1280 x 2800 px, which is higher than the A17's 1080 x 2340 px, offering more pixels for greater detail.

The Oppo F31 Pro Plus also boasts a faster 120Hz refresh rate, compared to the A17's 90Hz, which could result in smoother scrolling and gameplay on the Oppo. On the brightness front, the A17 shines brighter with a typical brightness of 800 nits, while the Oppo reaches 600 nits. Both phones have branded damage-resistant glass and a touch screen, ensuring durability and responsive interaction.

Neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, which means that while the displays are high-quality, they won’t have the enhanced HDR experience seen in some other smartphones. Neither device has a secondary screen.

The Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G comes with a higher RAM capacity of 12GB, compared to the Samsung Galaxy A17's 8GB. Both devices feature 256GB of internal storage, offering ample space for files and apps. The F31 Pro Plus is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, while the A17 uses the Samsung Exynos 1330 chipset. The Oppo phone has a slightly faster CPU configuration, with 1 core at 2.63 GHz, 3 cores at 2.4 GHz, and 4 cores at 1.8 GHz, while the A17’s CPU includes 2 cores at 2.4 GHz and 6 cores at 2 GHz.

In terms of GPU performance, the Oppo features the Adreno 720 with a clock speed of 950 MHz, while the A17 is equipped with the Mali G68 MP2, which has a lower clock speed of 800 MHz. Both devices have integrated LTE, support 64-bit processing, and are equipped with integrated graphics. The Oppo also supports DirectX 12 and has OpenGL ES 3.2, which matches the A17's specs in these areas.

The Oppo F31 Pro Plus benefits from a smaller 4 nm semiconductor size, which could allow for better efficiency, compared to the A17’s 5 nm semiconductor. The maximum memory bandwidth is notably higher on the A17 at 51.2 GB/s, while the Oppo has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s. Additionally, the Oppo supports a maximum memory amount of 16GB, which is higher than the A17’s 8GB. Both phones use DDR5 memory and employ big.LITTLE technology. The Oppo’s Thermal Design Power (TDP) is 6W, slightly higher than the A17’s 5W, suggesting a slight difference in power consumption.

The Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G features a dual-lens main camera setup with a 50 MP and a 2 MP sensor, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G has a triple-lens main camera setup with 50 MP, 5 MP, and 2 MP sensors. Both devices have a wide aperture of 2.4f on the main 50 MP lens, though the A17’s other lenses have slightly different apertures: 2.2f and 2.4f, compared to the F31 Pro Plus’s 1.8f and 2.4f. Both phones support phase-detection autofocus for photos and continuous autofocus when recording movies. They also both offer manual exposure, manual ISO, and touch autofocus.

For video recording, the F31 Pro Plus supports 2160 x 30 fps, which is higher resolution than the A17’s 1080 x 30 fps. Both phones support slow-motion video recording, have a flash, and offer panorama creation in-camera. Neither phone supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and neither offers a front-facing camera under the display or 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

On the front, the Oppo F31 Pro Plus has a 32 MP camera with a wide aperture of 2.4f, while the Samsung A17 features a 13 MP front camera with a slightly wider aperture of 2f. Both devices lack a front-facing LED flash and a dual-lens front camera. The front cameras on both devices support HDR, but neither offers a built-in HDR10 recording feature.

Both the Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G run on Android 15 and share a comprehensive set of privacy and customization features. These include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They also support app tracking blocking, on-device machine learning, customizable notifications, dark mode, and full-page screenshots. Neither phone offers Mail Privacy Protection or Wi-Fi password sharing, and neither has Quick Start enabled.

Both devices support split screen, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and have dynamic theming, with options to offload apps and use Live Text. They also include features like a media picker, notification permissions, and the ability to play games while downloading. The focus mode is missing on both phones. Additionally, both have a child lock, a multi-user system, offline voice recognition, and voice commands. They also track the current position of the mobile device.

One notable difference is that neither device gets direct OS updates, though they both are free and open-source. While both phones have sharing intents, they do not offer the ability to be used as a PC, and neither has a front-facing LED flash or 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

The Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G comes with a larger 7000 mAh battery, compared to the Samsung Galaxy A17's 5000 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging, but the Oppo offers a much higher charging speed at 80W, while the A17 supports 25W fast charging. Neither phone supports wireless charging or reverse wireless charging, and both feature a rechargeable battery. Additionally, both devices have a battery level indicator to help keep track of battery status.

Both phones also have non-removable batteries, so users cannot easily replace them themselves. The Oppo F31 Pro Plus’s larger battery and higher charging speed suggest it may offer longer battery life and faster charging times, but this depends on usage patterns.

In summary, the Oppo F31 Pro Plus stands out for its larger 7000 mAh battery and significantly faster 80W charging speed, while the Samsung A17 offers a more modest 5000 mAh battery and 25W charging speed.

Both the Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G do not feature a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users must rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. The Oppo F31 Pro Plus, however, offers stereo speakers, while the Samsung A17 does not have stereo speakers, providing a single speaker setup instead. Additionally, the Oppo supports a range of high-quality audio codecs, including aptX, LDAC, and aptX HD, making it a more versatile option for audiophiles compared to the A17, which lacks support for these codecs altogether.

Neither phone has aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, or a built-in radio. Both phones offer similar functionality in terms of audio connectivity, but the Oppo F31 Pro Plus stands out with its broader audio codec support and stereo speaker setup.

In summary, the Oppo F31 Pro Plus has more advanced audio capabilities, including stereo speakers and support for high-definition audio codecs like aptX, LDAC, and aptX HD, while the Samsung A17 is limited in its audio features.

Both the Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G support 5G connectivity, providing fast network speeds. The Oppo F31 Pro Plus supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), while the A17 supports Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5 but lacks Wi-Fi 6. In terms of Bluetooth, the Oppo uses version 5.2, whereas the A17 uses Bluetooth 5.3, offering a slightly newer version of the technology. The Oppo F31 Pro Plus has NFC, while the A17 also includes NFC, making both devices capable of wireless payments and pairing with other NFC-enabled devices.

In terms of SIM cards, both phones support 2 SIM cards, and neither device has an external memory slot for expandable storage. Both phones feature a USB Type-C port with USB 2.0 support. The Oppo F31 Pro Plus offers a higher download speed of 5000 MBits/s compared to the A17’s 2550 MBits/s, but the A17 offers a significantly higher upload speed of 1280 MBits/s compared to the Oppo’s 160 MBits/s.

Both devices include essential sensors such as a gyroscope, accelerometer, compass, and GPS. However, the Oppo F31 Pro Plus includes an infrared sensor, which the A17 lacks. Neither phone has a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner. Both phones support Galileo for satellite navigation, and neither includes a built-in projector. The fingerprint scanner is present in both phones, but neither supports emergency SOS via satellite or crash detection.

Both the Oppo F31 Pro Plus 5G and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G are equipped with a video light, making them capable of assisting with video capture in low-light conditions. Neither device has sapphire glass display protection, a curved display, or an e-paper display. These features are absent in both phones, and they share similar design characteristics in this regard.

In summary, the Oppo F31 Pro Plus and Samsung A17 both have the same key features in this category, including the video light, but lack any advanced display features like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.