Oppo Find X9 Pro VS Realme GT8 Pro (China)

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) are waterproof devices, each offering an Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP69. The Oppo Find X9 Pro is waterproof up to 1.5 meters, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) has a slightly higher waterproof depth rating of 2 meters.

In terms of size, the Oppo Find X9 Pro weighs 224 g and has dimensions of 161.3 mm in height, 76.5 mm in width, and a thickness of 8.3 mm. Its volume is 102.42 cm³. The Realme GT8 Pro (China) is slightly lighter at 218 g, with a height of 161.8 mm, width of 76.9 mm, and a thickness of 8.2 mm, resulting in a volume of 102.03 cm³. While both phones have nearly identical dimensions, the Realme GT8 Pro (China) is marginally slimmer and lighter.

Neither device has a rugged build or can be folded, so the design is focused on standard smartphone form factors without any added flexibility or durability features beyond water resistance.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The Oppo Find X9 Pro has a 6.78-inch screen with a pixel density of 450 ppi and a resolution of 1272 x 2772 px. In comparison, the Realme GT8 Pro (China) offers a slightly larger 6.79-inch screen, but with a higher pixel density of 508 ppi and a sharper resolution of 1440 x 3136 px.

In terms of refresh rate, the Oppo Find X9 Pro supports 120Hz, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) offers a faster 144Hz refresh rate. The brightness of the Oppo Find X9 Pro is 800 nits, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) stands out with a higher brightness of 1000 nits, providing potentially better visibility in bright conditions.

Both devices support HDR10, HDR10+, and have an Always-On Display feature. However, the Oppo Find X9 Pro supports Dolby Vision, which the Realme GT8 Pro (China) lacks. The Oppo Find X9 Pro also includes branded damage-resistant glass, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) does not. Neither phone has a secondary screen, and both support touch input.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) come equipped with 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, providing ample space and memory for multitasking and data storage. The Oppo Find X9 Pro is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset with a Mali G1 Ultra MP12 GPU, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset with an Adreno 830 GPU.

The CPU speeds differ between the two devices. The Oppo Find X9 Pro’s processor has a combination of 1 core running at 4.21 GHz, 3 cores at 3.5 GHz, and 4 cores at 2.7 GHz. In comparison, the Realme GT8 Pro (China) has a slightly faster configuration with 2 cores running at 4.6 GHz and 6 cores at 3.62 GHz. As for GPU clock speeds, the Oppo Find X9 Pro’s Mali G1 Ultra MP12 operates at 1750 MHz, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China)’s Adreno 830 runs at a lower 1200 MHz.

In terms of performance benchmarks, the Oppo Find X9 Pro achieved a Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 12189 and a single-core score of 3781, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) scored 10059 on multi-core and 3234 on single-core. Both phones support 64-bit architecture and use big.LITTLE technology with 8 CPU threads and HMP. Other specs such as the maximum memory bandwidth (85.3 GB/s for the Oppo vs 85.1 GB/s for the Realme) and the maximum supported RAM (24GB for both) are nearly identical, while the Oppo offers a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to the Realme's 8 MB. Both devices also use DDR5 memory and support multithreading.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) feature triple-lens main cameras with 200 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP lenses. However, the wide apertures for their lenses differ slightly: the Oppo Find X9 Pro has apertures of f/2.1, f/1.5, and f/2, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) has apertures of f/2.6, f/1.8, and f/2. Both devices also offer optical zoom at 3x and feature CMOS sensors. The Oppo Find X9 Pro includes built-in optical image stabilization (OIS), while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) lacks this feature.

When it comes to video recording, the Oppo Find X9 Pro supports recording at 2160p at 60 fps, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) can record at a higher resolution of 4320p, though only at 30 fps. Both devices support slow-motion video, have continuous autofocus for video, and can record in raw format. The Oppo Find X9 Pro offers Dolby Vision recording, which the Realme GT8 Pro (China) does not, while the Realme supports HDR10 recording, which the Oppo does not.

For front cameras, the Oppo Find X9 Pro is equipped with a 50 MP sensor with a wide aperture of f/2, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) has a lower-resolution 32 MP front camera with an aperture of f/2.4. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash, but both devices support HDR for front-facing video. The Oppo Find X9 Pro offers manual shutter speed adjustments for both main and front cameras, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) lacks this feature for its main camera but does allow for panorama creation on both the front and rear cameras.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) run Android 16 and share a comprehensive range of privacy and customization features. They both include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. Neither device supports Mail Privacy Protection, but both allow blocking cross-site tracking and have on-device machine learning. They also offer notification permissions, media picker functionality, and the ability to play games while they download.

Both devices feature dark mode, battery health check, and an extra dim mode, while neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing. Focus modes are absent on both phones, but they support dynamic theming and can offload apps. The Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) both have customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen support, and PiP functionality. Neither device can be used as a PC, and both support sharing intents and a child lock feature. They also support widgets, are free and open-source, and feature offline voice recognition and voice commands.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) both track the current position of a mobile device and are multi-user systems. However, they lack Quick Start functionality. The operating systems are almost identical across both devices, with no notable differences in features or functionality within this group.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) both feature large batteries with impressive power capacities. The Oppo Find X9 Pro is equipped with a 7500 mAh battery, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) has a slightly smaller 7000 mAh battery. Both devices support wireless charging at a speed of 50W, but the Oppo Find X9 Pro supports a faster wired charging speed of 80W, while the Realme GT8 Pro (China) offers an even faster 120W wired charging speed.

In terms of other battery features, the Oppo Find X9 Pro has reverse wireless charging, allowing it to charge other devices wirelessly. The Realme GT8 Pro (China) lacks this feature. Both devices come with a charger and have non-removable rechargeable batteries. They also include a battery level indicator, ensuring users can easily monitor battery status.

Overall, while both phones support fast charging and wireless charging, the Oppo Find X9 Pro offers reverse wireless charging, and the Realme GT8 Pro (China) delivers faster wired charging speeds.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) do not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, which means users will need to rely on wireless audio solutions or adapters. Both devices feature stereo speakers, enhancing the overall audio experience with better sound quality compared to mono speakers.

When it comes to audio codecs, the Oppo Find X9 Pro supports aptX, LDAC, and aptX HD, but it does not support aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless. In contrast, the Realme GT8 Pro (China) supports aptX HD but lacks support for aptX, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless. Additionally, neither device includes a built-in radio, offering a purely digital audio experience.

In summary, while both phones support stereo speakers and do not offer a 3.5 mm audio jack or a radio, the Oppo Find X9 Pro offers a broader range of audio codec support, including aptX and LDAC, which the Realme GT8 Pro (China) lacks.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) feature 5G support, enabling high-speed mobile connectivity. They both offer dual SIM card slots and support Wi-Fi versions 4, 5, 6, and 7, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of networks. Additionally, both phones are equipped with Bluetooth 6, USB Type-C, and NFC for seamless wireless connections. While both devices have similar download speeds (10700 MBits/s for the Oppo and 10000 MBits/s for the Realme), the Oppo Find X9 Pro slightly outperforms the Realme in this aspect.

Both devices include a fingerprint scanner, a gyroscope, GPS, a compass, and an infrared sensor. They also feature an accelerometer and a cellular module, which are common across both models. The Oppo Find X9 Pro offers emergency SOS via satellite, a feature the Realme GT8 Pro (China) lacks. Neither phone includes a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner, and neither supports motion or optical tracking.

Overall, both phones share many connectivity features, including NFC, dual SIM, and support for multiple Wi-Fi standards. The Oppo Find X9 Pro stands out with its satellite emergency SOS feature, which is not available on the Realme GT8 Pro (China). Otherwise, the two devices are largely comparable in terms of connectivity and sensors.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) come with a video light, enabling better lighting for video recordings. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, ensuring that both phones offer standard display technology without these advanced display features.

Overall, the Oppo Find X9 Pro and Realme GT8 Pro (China) are similar in this category, with no significant differences in terms of display materials or special display technologies. The key distinguishing feature for both phones is the inclusion of a video light, which enhances video recording capabilities in low-light environments.

In summary, both devices are equipped with basic display technologies and a video light, but they do not offer the additional advanced display features like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.