Oppo Find X9 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro

Oppo Find X9 Pro Vivo X300 Pro

Common Features

  • Both products are waterproof and have an IP69 rating.
  • Both products have a 6.78-inch OLED/AMOLED display.
  • Both products support HDR10 and HDR10+.
  • Both products have a 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Both products feature an Always-On Display.
  • Both products are equipped with 16GB of RAM.
  • Both products feature a 1024GB internal storage.
  • Both products have a MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset.
  • Both products have a Mali G1 Ultra MP12 GPU.
  • Both products have a 50MP front camera.
  • Both products support wireless charging.
  • Both products support fast charging.
  • Both products support reverse wireless charging.
  • Both products support stereo speakers.
  • Both products support Bluetooth 6.
  • Both products support 5G.
  • Both products are equipped with a fingerprint scanner.
  • Both products have a USB Type-C port.
  • Both products support NFC.

Main Differences

  • Oppo Find X9 Pro weighs 224 g, while Vivo X300 Pro weighs 226 g.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a thickness of 8.3 mm, while Vivo X300 Pro has a thickness of 8 mm.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro is 76.5 mm wide, while Vivo X300 Pro is 75.5 mm wide.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a height of 161.3 mm, while Vivo X300 Pro has a height of 161.2 mm.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a volume of 102.42 cm³, while Vivo X300 Pro has a volume of 97.36 cm³.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a pixel density of 450 ppi, while Vivo X300 Pro has a pixel density of 452 ppi.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a resolution of 1272 x 2772 px, while Vivo X300 Pro has a resolution of 1260 x 2800 px.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a touch sampling rate of 240Hz, while Vivo X300 Pro has a touch sampling rate of 300Hz.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro scores 3649108 in the AnTuTu benchmark, while Vivo X300 Pro scores 3015900.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a wide aperture of 2.1 & 1.5 & 2f, while Vivo X300 Pro has a wide aperture of 2.7 & 1.6 & 2f.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro supports video recording at 2160 x 60 fps, while Vivo X300 Pro supports video recording at 4320 x 30 fps.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has 1 flash LED, while Vivo X300 Pro has 2 flash LEDs.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has an optical zoom of 3x, while Vivo X300 Pro has an optical zoom of 3.7x.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has manual shutter speed control, while Vivo X300 Pro does not have manual shutter speed control.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a maximum focal length of 70 mm, while Vivo X300 Pro has a maximum focal length of 85 mm.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro supports HDR10 recording, while Vivo X300 Pro does not support HDR10 recording.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has a battery power of 7500 mAh, while Vivo X300 Pro has a battery power of 6510 mAh.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro supports charging at 80W, while Vivo X300 Pro supports charging at 90W.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro supports wireless charging at 50W, while Vivo X300 Pro supports wireless charging at 40W.
  • Oppo Find X9 Pro has LDAC support, while Vivo X300 Pro does not have LDAC support.
Specs Comparison
Oppo Find X9 Pro

Oppo Find X9 Pro

Vivo X300 Pro

Vivo X300 Pro

Design:
water resistance Waterproof Waterproof
weight 224 g 226 g
thickness 8.3 mm 8 mm
width 76.5 mm 75.5 mm
height 161.3 mm 161.2 mm
volume 102.417435 cm³ 97.3648 cm³
Ingress Protection (IP) rating IP69 IP69
waterproof depth rating 1.5 m 1.5 m
has a rugged build
can be folded

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are waterproof, with an IP69 rating, meaning they can withstand dust and water exposure up to 1.5 meters in depth. This makes both devices equally resistant to harsh environments, offering the same level of protection.

When it comes to weight, the Vivo X300 Pro is slightly heavier at 226 g, compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro's 224 g. The difference in weight is minimal, but it may still be noticeable to some users. The Vivo X300 Pro is also a bit thinner, at 8 mm, compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro's 8.3 mm.

In terms of size, the two devices are quite similar. The Oppo Find X9 Pro measures 161.3 mm in height and 76.5 mm in width, while the Vivo X300 Pro is just slightly smaller, at 161.2 mm in height and 75.5 mm in width. The Oppo phone has a slightly larger volume at 102.42 cm³, while the Vivo X300 Pro has a volume of 97.36 cm³, meaning the Oppo model is marginally bigger overall.

Display:
Display type OLED/AMOLED OLED/AMOLED
screen size 6.78" 6.78"
pixel density 450 ppi 452 ppi
resolution 1272 x 2772 px 1260 x 2800 px
refresh rate 120Hz 120Hz
touch sampling rate 240Hz 300Hz
has branded damage-resistant glass
supports HDR10
supports HDR10+
Always-On Display
supports Dolby Vision
Has a secondary screen
has a touch screen

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The screen size is identical on both devices, with each sporting a 6.78″ display. However, the pixel density differs slightly, with the Vivo X300 Pro having a slightly higher 452 ppi compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro's 450 ppi, offering marginally sharper details on the Vivo device.

Both phones share a similar resolution, with the Oppo Find X9 Pro offering 1272 x 2772 px, while the Vivo X300 Pro has a resolution of 1260 x 2800 px. The differences in resolution are small but may have an effect on the overall image sharpness, with the Vivo X300 Pro having a slightly taller aspect ratio.

In terms of performance, both devices feature a 120Hz refresh rate and are equipped with high-touch sampling rates. The Vivo X300 Pro boasts a higher 300Hz touch sampling rate compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro's 240Hz, which may provide a more responsive touch experience on the Vivo. Both models also support HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, and feature Always-On Displays, as well as branded damage-resistant glass. Neither phone includes a secondary screen, and both have touchscreens.

Performance:
internal storage 1024GB 1024GB
RAM 16GB 16GB
AnTuTu benchmark score 3649108 3015900
Chipset (SoC) name MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
GPU name Mali G1 Ultra MP12 Mali G1 Ultra MP12
CPU speed 1 x 4.21 & 3 x 3.5 & 4 x 2.7 GHz 1 x 4.21 & 3 x 3.5 & 4 x 2.7 GHz
Geekbench 6 result (multi) 12189 12189
Geekbench 6 result (single) 3781 3781
GPU clock speed 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
Has integrated LTE
RAM speed 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
semiconductor size 3 nm 3 nm
Supports 64-bit
Has integrated graphics
Uses big.LITTLE technology
CPU threads 8 threads 8 threads
Uses HMP
maximum memory bandwidth 85.3 GB/s 85.3 GB/s
OpenCL version 3 3
maximum memory amount 24GB 24GB
uses multithreading
DDR memory version 5 5
shading units 128 128
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are equipped with identical internal storage of 1024GB and 16GB of RAM, ensuring both devices offer ample space and memory for heavy multitasking and storage. Both models also feature the same MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, paired with a Mali G1 Ultra MP12 GPU, ensuring similar performance in processing and graphics rendering.

While the CPU specifications are identical, with a configuration of 1 x 4.21 GHz, 3 x 3.5 GHz, and 4 x 2.7 GHz, and 8 threads, the Oppo Find X9 Pro achieves a higher AnTuTu benchmark score of 3,649,108, compared to the Vivo X300 Pro's score of 3,015,900. This indicates that the Oppo may provide slightly better overall performance, particularly in graphics and computational tasks.

Other specifications, such as Geekbench 6 results (single-core: 3781, multi-core: 12189), GPU clock speed (1750 MHz), RAM speed (5333 MHz), and maximum memory bandwidth (85.3 GB/s) are identical across both devices. Both phones also share features like integrated LTE, 64-bit support, HMP, multithreading, and a maximum memory capacity of 24GB. The semiconductor size for both is 3 nm, and both models are based on the DDR5 memory version with 128 shading units and a 16 MB L3 cache.

Cameras:
megapixels (main camera) 200 & 50 & 50 MP 200 & 50 & 50 MP
wide aperture (main camera) 2.1 & 1.5 & 2f 2.7 & 1.6 & 2f
Has a dual-lens (or multi-lens) main camera
megapixels (front camera) 50MP 50MP
has built-in optical image stabilization
video recording (main camera) 2160 x 60 fps 4320 x 30 fps
Has a dual-tone LED flash
number of flash LEDs 1 2
has a BSI sensor
has a CMOS sensor
has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Has phase-detection autofocus for photos
supports slow-motion video recording
has a built-in HDR mode
has manual exposure
has a flash
optical zoom 3x 3.7x
has manual ISO
has a serial shot mode
has manual focus
has a front camera
Has laser autofocus
Shoots 360° panorama
has manual white balance
shoots raw
has touch autofocus
has manual shutter speed
can create panoramas in-camera
wide aperture (front camera) 2f 2f
Has timelapse function
minimum focal length 15 mm 15 mm
maximum focal length 70 mm 85 mm
Has a front-facing LED flash
has a dual-lens (or multi-lens) front camera
supports HDR10 recording
supports Dolby Vision recording
has a front-facing camera under the display
Has a RGB LED flash
has 3D photo/video recording capabilities

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro feature impressive triple-camera setups on the back, each with 200 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP sensors. The main difference lies in the wide apertures: the Oppo Find X9 Pro offers 2.1f, 1.5f, and 2f apertures, while the Vivo X300 Pro has 2.7f, 1.6f, and 2f apertures. The Oppo's slightly wider apertures may allow for a bit more light capture in some scenarios.

Both devices feature optical image stabilization, phase-detection autofocus, and laser autofocus for more precise focusing. The Oppo Find X9 Pro offers 3x optical zoom, while the Vivo X300 Pro provides a slightly more powerful 3.7x optical zoom. Additionally, the Oppo supports video recording at 2160p (60 fps), while the Vivo records video at 4320p (30 fps), indicating a difference in video resolution and frame rate capabilities.

For the front camera, both devices come with a 50 MP sensor and the same wide aperture of 2f. Neither phone features a front-facing LED flash. The Oppo Find X9 Pro includes manual shutter speed adjustments, while the Vivo X300 Pro does not, although both phones support timelapse and raw image capture. The Oppo also has a more advanced HDR10 recording feature, while the Vivo lacks support for HDR10 recording but still includes HDR functionality for photos.

Operating system:
Android version Android 16 Android 16
has clipboard warnings
has location privacy options
has camera/microphone privacy options
has Mail Privacy Protection
has theme customization
can block app tracking
blocks cross-site tracking
has on-device machine learning
has notification permissions
has media picker
Can play games while they download
has dark mode
has Wi-Fi password sharing
has battery health check
has an extra dim mode
has focus modes
has dynamic theming
can offload apps
Has customizable notifications
has Live Text
has full-page screenshots
supports split screen
gets direct OS updates
has PiP
Can be used as a PC
Has sharing intents
has a child lock
Supports widgets
Is free and open source
Has offline voice recognition
has voice commands
Tracks the current position of a mobile device
is a multi-user system
has Quick Start

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro run on Android 16, offering a wide array of privacy, customization, and accessibility features. These features include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. Both devices also offer theme customization, dark mode, and dynamic theming for a personalized user experience.

When it comes to performance-enhancing features, both phones can play games while they download, offload apps, and provide customizable notifications. They also support full-page screenshots, Live Text, and split-screen multitasking. Additionally, both models have PiP (Picture-in-Picture), voice commands, offline voice recognition, and track the device's current position. Both also support a multi-user system, widgets, and sharing intents. Neither device offers Quick Start, and both lack support for focus modes and Wi-Fi password sharing.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro both offer battery health checks and an extra dim mode. Neither device supports Mail Privacy Protection or cross-site tracking blocking. Furthermore, both are free and open source, and neither has the ability to be used as a PC. Both phones also provide child lock features, but only the Oppo Find X9 Pro includes a manual shutter speed feature for further customization.

Battery:
battery power 7500 mAh 6510 mAh
has wireless charging
Supports fast charging
charging speed 80W 90W
wireless charging speed 50W 40W
has reverse wireless charging
comes with a charger
has a removable battery
has a battery level indicator
has a rechargeable battery

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro both feature large batteries, with the Oppo having a 7500 mAh battery, while the Vivo has a slightly smaller 6510 mAh battery. Both phones support wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. The Oppo supports wireless charging at 50W, whereas the Vivo supports it at 40W, indicating the Oppo offers slightly faster wireless charging.

When it comes to wired charging, the Vivo X300 Pro has a faster charging speed of 90W compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro's 80W. Both devices come with a charger in the box, and neither has a removable battery. Both phones also have a battery level indicator and feature rechargeable batteries, ensuring convenience and long-term usability.

Overall, while both devices offer strong battery features, the Oppo Find X9 Pro has a larger battery capacity and faster wireless charging, while the Vivo X300 Pro offers a higher wired charging speed.

Audio:
has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack
has stereo speakers
has aptX
has LDAC
has aptX HD
has aptX Adaptive
has aptX Lossless
Has a radio

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro do not feature a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. However, both devices are equipped with stereo speakers, ensuring high-quality sound output. Additionally, both phones support aptX and aptX HD, offering improved audio quality for compatible Bluetooth devices.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro also supports LDAC, allowing for high-resolution audio streaming over Bluetooth, while the Vivo X300 Pro does not include LDAC support. Neither device supports aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless, and neither includes a radio function.

In summary, while both phones share common audio features like stereo speakers and aptX support, the Oppo Find X9 Pro stands out with LDAC support for higher-quality Bluetooth audio, which the Vivo X300 Pro lacks.

Connectivity & Features:
release date October 2025 October 2025
has 5G support
Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)
SIM cards 2 SIM 2 SIM
Bluetooth version 6 6
has an external memory slot
Has USB Type-C
has NFC
download speed 10700 MBits/s 10700 MBits/s
Has a fingerprint scanner
has emergency SOS via satellite
has crash detection
is DLNA-certified
has a gyroscope
supports ANT+
Has a heart rate monitor
has GPS
has a compass
supports Wi-Fi
Has an infrared sensor
has an accelerometer
has a cellular module
Has a barometer
has an HDMI output
Uses 3D facial recognition
Has an iris scanner
Stylus included
supports Galileo
Has motion tracking
Has optical tracking
Has a built-in projector

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro offer identical connectivity and feature sets, both supporting 5G, NFC, and USB Type-C. Both devices also feature dual SIM slots and Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 7 support for versatile wireless connections. Bluetooth 6, a fingerprint scanner, and emergency SOS via satellite are also present on both phones. Download speed is the same at 10700 MBits/s for both devices.

Both models are equipped with a gyroscope, GPS, a compass, and an infrared sensor, along with an accelerometer and a cellular module. Neither phone supports ANT+, has a heart rate monitor, a barometer, or HDMI output. Both devices lack 3D facial recognition and iris scanners, and neither includes a stylus or a built-in projector.

Other shared features include support for Galileo and motion tracking, although neither phone has optical tracking capabilities. The Vivo X300 Pro and Oppo Find X9 Pro both offer a similar range of features, with no major differences between the two in terms of connectivity and sensors.

Miscellaneous:
has a video light
Has sapphire glass display
Has a curved display
Has an e-paper display

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro feature a video light, providing enhanced illumination for video recording. Neither device comes with a sapphire glass display, has a curved display, or includes an e-paper display, as all of these features are absent in both models.

In summary, the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are identical in terms of these miscellaneous display and design features, with no differences between them in this group.

Comparison Summary

This is a specification comparison between Oppo Find X9 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro. Both products share features like a 6.78″ OLED/AMOLED display, 120Hz refresh rate, 16GB RAM, and 1024GB internal storage. However, there are notable differences, including the battery power, with Oppo offering 7500 mAh and Vivo 6510 mAh. Oppo supports wireless charging at 50W, while Vivo supports 40W. Oppo also has a 3x optical zoom, compared to Vivo's 3.7x, and Oppo features manual shutter speed control, which Vivo lacks.