Oppo Find X9 Pro VS Vivo X300 Pro

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro share identical waterproofing credentials — an IP69 rating with a 1.5 m depth threshold — so neither holds an advantage in protection. IP69 is among the more robust ratings available on consumer smartphones, offering resistance not just to immersion but also to high-pressure water jets, which is a meaningful real-world benefit for durability.

Where the two phones diverge is in their physical footprint. The X300 Pro is measurably more compact: it is 0.3 mm thinner (8.0 mm vs. 8.3 mm) and 1 mm narrower (75.5 mm vs. 76.5 mm), and this compounds into a notably smaller overall volume — 97.4 cm³ versus 102.4 cm³, a difference of roughly 5%. In practical terms, the X300 Pro will feel slightly more manageable in one hand and fit more easily into a pocket, which matters during extended use. Weight is essentially a wash: the X9 Pro is 224 g versus the X300 Pro's 226 g, a 2 g gap that is imperceptible in daily handling.

On design, the Vivo X300 Pro holds a clear edge purely on the basis of compactness. With the same waterproofing and nearly identical weight, its slimmer and narrower profile offers a more pocketable, ergonomic experience without any trade-off in protection.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The screen size is identical on both devices, with each sporting a 6.78″ display. However, the pixel density differs slightly, with the Vivo X300 Pro having a slightly higher 452 ppi compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro's 450 ppi, offering marginally sharper details on the Vivo device.

Both phones share a similar resolution, with the Oppo Find X9 Pro offering 1272 x 2772 px, while the Vivo X300 Pro has a resolution of 1260 x 2800 px. The differences in resolution are small but may have an effect on the overall image sharpness, with the Vivo X300 Pro having a slightly taller aspect ratio.

In terms of performance, both devices feature a 120Hz refresh rate and are equipped with high-touch sampling rates. The Vivo X300 Pro boasts a higher 300Hz touch sampling rate compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro's 240Hz, which may provide a more responsive touch experience on the Vivo. Both models also support HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, and feature Always-On Displays, as well as branded damage-resistant glass. Neither phone includes a secondary screen, and both have touchscreens.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are equipped with identical internal storage of 1024GB and 16GB of RAM, ensuring both devices offer ample space and memory for heavy multitasking and storage. Both models also feature the same MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, paired with a Mali G1 Ultra MP12 GPU, ensuring similar performance in processing and graphics rendering.

While the CPU specifications are identical, with a configuration of 1 x 4.21 GHz, 3 x 3.5 GHz, and 4 x 2.7 GHz, and 8 threads, the Oppo Find X9 Pro achieves a higher AnTuTu benchmark score of 3,649,108, compared to the Vivo X300 Pro's score of 3,015,900. This indicates that the Oppo may provide slightly better overall performance, particularly in graphics and computational tasks.

Other specifications, such as Geekbench 6 results (single-core: 3781, multi-core: 12189), GPU clock speed (1750 MHz), RAM speed (5333 MHz), and maximum memory bandwidth (85.3 GB/s) are identical across both devices. Both phones also share features like integrated LTE, 64-bit support, HMP, multithreading, and a maximum memory capacity of 24GB. The semiconductor size for both is 3 nm, and both models are based on the DDR5 memory version with 128 shading units and a 16 MB L3 cache.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro feature impressive triple-camera setups on the back, each with 200 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP sensors. The main difference lies in the wide apertures: the Oppo Find X9 Pro offers 2.1f, 1.5f, and 2f apertures, while the Vivo X300 Pro has 2.7f, 1.6f, and 2f apertures. The Oppo's slightly wider apertures may allow for a bit more light capture in some scenarios.

Both devices feature optical image stabilization, phase-detection autofocus, and laser autofocus for more precise focusing. The Oppo Find X9 Pro offers 3x optical zoom, while the Vivo X300 Pro provides a slightly more powerful 3.7x optical zoom. Additionally, the Oppo supports video recording at 2160p (60 fps), while the Vivo records video at 4320p (30 fps), indicating a difference in video resolution and frame rate capabilities.

For the front camera, both devices come with a 50 MP sensor and the same wide aperture of 2f. Neither phone features a front-facing LED flash. The Oppo Find X9 Pro includes manual shutter speed adjustments, while the Vivo X300 Pro does not, although both phones support timelapse and raw image capture. The Oppo also has a more advanced HDR10 recording feature, while the Vivo lacks support for HDR10 recording but still includes HDR functionality for photos.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro run on Android 16, offering a wide array of privacy, customization, and accessibility features. These features include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. Both devices also offer theme customization, dark mode, and dynamic theming for a personalized user experience.

When it comes to performance-enhancing features, both phones can play games while they download, offload apps, and provide customizable notifications. They also support full-page screenshots, Live Text, and split-screen multitasking. Additionally, both models have PiP (Picture-in-Picture), voice commands, offline voice recognition, and track the device's current position. Both also support a multi-user system, widgets, and sharing intents. Neither device offers Quick Start, and both lack support for focus modes and Wi-Fi password sharing.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro both offer battery health checks and an extra dim mode. Neither device supports Mail Privacy Protection or cross-site tracking blocking. Furthermore, both are free and open source, and neither has the ability to be used as a PC. Both phones also provide child lock features, but only the Oppo Find X9 Pro includes a manual shutter speed feature for further customization.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro both feature large batteries, with the Oppo having a 7500 mAh battery, while the Vivo has a slightly smaller 6510 mAh battery. Both phones support wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. The Oppo supports wireless charging at 50W, whereas the Vivo supports it at 40W, indicating the Oppo offers slightly faster wireless charging.

When it comes to wired charging, the Vivo X300 Pro has a faster charging speed of 90W compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro's 80W. Both devices come with a charger in the box, and neither has a removable battery. Both phones also have a battery level indicator and feature rechargeable batteries, ensuring convenience and long-term usability.

Overall, while both devices offer strong battery features, the Oppo Find X9 Pro has a larger battery capacity and faster wireless charging, while the Vivo X300 Pro offers a higher wired charging speed.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro do not feature a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. However, both devices are equipped with stereo speakers, ensuring high-quality sound output. Additionally, both phones support aptX and aptX HD, offering improved audio quality for compatible Bluetooth devices.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro also supports LDAC, allowing for high-resolution audio streaming over Bluetooth, while the Vivo X300 Pro does not include LDAC support. Neither device supports aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless, and neither includes a radio function.

In summary, while both phones share common audio features like stereo speakers and aptX support, the Oppo Find X9 Pro stands out with LDAC support for higher-quality Bluetooth audio, which the Vivo X300 Pro lacks.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro offer identical connectivity and feature sets, both supporting 5G, NFC, and USB Type-C. Both devices also feature dual SIM slots and Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 7 support for versatile wireless connections. Bluetooth 6, a fingerprint scanner, and emergency SOS via satellite are also present on both phones. Download speed is the same at 10700 MBits/s for both devices.

Both models are equipped with a gyroscope, GPS, a compass, and an infrared sensor, along with an accelerometer and a cellular module. Neither phone supports ANT+, has a heart rate monitor, a barometer, or HDMI output. Both devices lack 3D facial recognition and iris scanners, and neither includes a stylus or a built-in projector.

Other shared features include support for Galileo and motion tracking, although neither phone has optical tracking capabilities. The Vivo X300 Pro and Oppo Find X9 Pro both offer a similar range of features, with no major differences between the two in terms of connectivity and sensors.

Both the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro feature a video light, providing enhanced illumination for video recording. Neither device comes with a sapphire glass display, has a curved display, or includes an e-paper display, as all of these features are absent in both models.

In summary, the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are identical in terms of these miscellaneous display and design features, with no differences between them in this group.