Oppo Find X9 VS Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

The Oppo Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge both offer waterproof designs, though the Find X9 comes with a higher Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP69 compared to the IP68 rating of the Galaxy S25 Edge. This suggests a slightly more robust level of protection against dust and water for the Oppo device.

In terms of weight, the Oppo Find X9 is heavier at 203 g, while the Galaxy S25 Edge is lighter at 163 g, making the Samsung device easier to handle for those seeking a lighter phone. The Find X9 also has a slightly larger footprint, with a width of 73.9 mm and a height of 157 mm, compared to the Galaxy S25 Edge's 75.6 mm width and 158.2 mm height. Despite the Find X9 being slightly more compact, the difference in dimensions is minimal.

The thickness of the two devices also differs, with the Oppo Find X9 measuring 8 mm thick, while the Galaxy S25 Edge is thinner at 5.8 mm. As for volume, the Oppo phone has a larger body volume of 92.8184 cm³ compared to the Galaxy S25 Edge’s 69.367536 cm³, reflecting the Find X9's slightly bulkier design.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge feature OLED/AMOLED displays, delivering vibrant and high-quality visuals. The Find X9 has a screen size of 6.59″, while the Galaxy S25 Edge offers a slightly larger 6.7″ screen. As for pixel density, the Galaxy S25 Edge is ahead with 513 ppi compared to the Find X9’s 460 ppi, meaning the Samsung display offers a higher level of sharpness.

The resolution on the two devices also differs, with the Oppo Find X9 sporting a resolution of 1256 x 2760 px, while the Galaxy S25 Edge comes in at 1440 x 3120 px, providing more detail on the larger screen. Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and gaming experiences.

In terms of features, both phones come with branded damage-resistant glass, support HDR10 and HDR10+, and include an Always-On Display. However, the Oppo Find X9 supports Dolby Vision, which the Galaxy S25 Edge does not. Neither device has a secondary screen, and both support touch input.

The Oppo Find X9 is equipped with 1024GB of internal storage, double the 512GB storage in the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge. The Find X9 also has more RAM, offering 16GB compared to the Galaxy S25 Edge’s 12GB. Both devices use a 3 nm semiconductor size, which is efficient for modern chipsets, and support 64-bit processing, with integrated graphics and LTE capabilities.

Looking at the chipset and CPU performance, the Oppo Find X9 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Galaxy S25 Edge uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. The Oppo device features a CPU speed of 1 x 4.21 GHz, 3 x 3.5 GHz, and 4 x 2.7 GHz, while the Galaxy S25 Edge has a slightly faster CPU with 2 x 4.32 GHz and 6 x 3.53 GHz. Both phones utilize big.LITTLE technology, support multithreading, and have 8 CPU threads. The Oppo Find X9’s CPU results in a Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 12189 and a single-core score of 3781, while the Galaxy S25 Edge scores 10059 and 3234, respectively.

When it comes to GPU, the Oppo Find X9 uses the Mali G1 Ultra MP12 with a clock speed of 1750 MHz, whereas the Galaxy S25 Edge has the Adreno 830 GPU, clocked at 1100 MHz. The Find X9 also offers higher memory bandwidth at 85.3 GB/s, compared to 85.1 GB/s in the Galaxy S25 Edge. The Oppo device also supports up to 24GB of memory, while the Galaxy S25 Edge has the same maximum memory amount. The Oppo Find X9 has 128 shading units, whereas the Galaxy S25 Edge has a significantly higher 1536 shading units. Both devices are capable of running OpenCL 3.0 and have 16 MB and 8 MB of L3 cache, respectively, with the Find X9 offering more cache memory.

The Oppo Find X9 features a triple-lens main camera with 50 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP sensors, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge has a dual-lens main camera with 200 MP and 12 MP sensors. The wide apertures also differ, with the Find X9 offering 1.6f, 2.6f, and 2f for its lenses, while the Galaxy S25 Edge's lenses have apertures of 2.2f and 1.7f. Both devices support phase-detection autofocus and continuous autofocus when recording movies, and they both have a CMOS sensor. Both also support slow-motion video recording, manual exposure, and raw shooting.

For video recording, the Oppo Find X9 can shoot in 2160p at 60 fps, while the Galaxy S25 Edge supports a higher resolution of 4320p at 30 fps. The Oppo phone also includes a laser autofocus system, while the Galaxy S25 Edge does not. Neither device offers a dual-tone LED flash, and both have a single flash LED. The Oppo Find X9 supports HDR10 recording, but the Galaxy S25 Edge does not.

Both phones feature 32 MP (Oppo Find X9) and 12 MP (Galaxy S25 Edge) front cameras, with wide apertures of 2.4f and 2.2f respectively. Both front cameras have a flash and offer features such as manual white balance and timelapse. The Oppo Find X9 has a front-facing LED flash, while the Galaxy S25 Edge does not. Neither phone supports a front-facing camera under the display or RGB LED flash. Additionally, neither device supports 3D photo or video recording capabilities.

The Oppo Find X9 runs on Android 16, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge operates on Android 15. Both devices have similar features in terms of privacy options, with clipboard warnings, location privacy, and camera/microphone privacy settings available on both phones. Neither device supports Mail Privacy Protection, but both offer theme customization, app tracking blocking, and notification permissions. Both also support dark mode, media picker, and can play games while downloading.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and the Galaxy S25 Edge come with features like battery health check, an extra dim mode, dynamic theming, offloading apps, and customizable notifications. The Oppo device includes more specific features, such as on-device machine learning, live text, and full-page screenshots. Both phones support split screen, PiP, and widgets, but the Oppo Find X9 also offers offline voice recognition and voice commands.

One notable difference is that the Galaxy S25 Edge can be used as a PC, a feature the Oppo Find X9 lacks. Additionally, the Oppo device supports a multi-user system, while the Galaxy S25 Edge offers the same. Both phones lack Quick Start, and neither device gets direct OS updates. The Oppo Find X9 also supports tracking the current position of the device and offers a child lock, features that the Galaxy S25 Edge also shares.

The Oppo Find X9 has a significantly larger battery with a capacity of 7025 mAh, compared to the 3900 mAh battery in the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge. Both phones support wireless charging, but the Find X9 offers a much faster wireless charging speed of 50W, while the Galaxy S25 Edge supports 15W wireless charging. Additionally, the Oppo Find X9 supports reverse wireless charging, a feature not available on the Galaxy S25 Edge.

When it comes to wired charging, the Oppo Find X9 supports fast charging at 80W, much higher than the 25W fast charging supported by the Galaxy S25 Edge. Both phones have a rechargeable battery and a battery level indicator, ensuring you can easily monitor battery status.

Neither phone has a removable battery, but both include the necessary features for convenient battery management, such as rechargeable batteries and a battery level indicator.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, but they both feature stereo speakers for audio output. The Oppo Find X9 supports aptX for high-quality Bluetooth audio streaming, but does not support LDAC or any of the advanced aptX variants such as aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. In comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge also supports aptX and has the added benefit of supporting LDAC for better high-resolution audio streaming over Bluetooth. Like the Oppo Find X9, the Galaxy S25 Edge also does not support aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless.

Neither device includes a radio for FM or other broadcast radio reception, which may be a drawback for users seeking that feature. Both phones offer similar audio capabilities, but the Galaxy S25 Edge has an edge with LDAC support for better Bluetooth audio quality.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge offer 5G support, ensuring fast network connectivity. The Oppo Find X9 supports a Wi-Fi range from Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) to Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), while the Galaxy S25 Edge supports a similar range, but also includes Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) for additional performance. Both phones feature 2 SIM card slots, with the Galaxy S25 Edge offering the added flexibility of 2 eSIMs in addition to the physical SIMs, while the Oppo device supports only 2 physical SIMs.

When it comes to Bluetooth, the Oppo Find X9 supports version 6, while the Galaxy S25 Edge supports the slightly older Bluetooth version 5.4. Both devices include NFC for contactless communication, USB Type-C for charging and data transfer, and a fingerprint scanner for security. The download speed on the Oppo Find X9 is rated at 10700 MBits/s, a bit higher than the 10000 MBits/s of the Galaxy S25 Edge.

The Oppo Find X9 has a wider range of sensors compared to the Galaxy S25 Edge, including an infrared sensor and the ability to support ANT+, while the Galaxy S25 Edge supports ANT+ but lacks an infrared sensor. The Galaxy S25 Edge also includes a barometer, which the Oppo Find X9 does not have. Both phones feature a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass, as well as a cellular module for connectivity. Neither device includes an HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, a stylus, motion or optical tracking, or a built-in projector.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge are equipped with a video light for enhanced lighting during video recordings. Neither device includes sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning both feature more traditional screen designs without these premium or specialized display technologies.

The specifications for these miscellaneous features are identical between the two devices, with both lacking any of the unique display enhancements like sapphire glass or a curved screen.

Overall, both devices share the same features in this category, with a focus on standard display functionality and video lighting, without additional display or glass technologies.