Oppo Find X9 VS Vivo X300

Both the Oppo Find X9 and the Vivo X300 are waterproof with an Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP69, meaning they can both withstand exposure to water up to 1.5 meters deep. However, they have different physical dimensions. The Oppo Find X9 has a weight of 203 g, which is slightly heavier than the Vivo X300's 190 g. In terms of size, the Oppo Find X9 is also a bit larger, with a height of 157 mm and a width of 73.9 mm, compared to the Vivo X300’s height of 150.6 mm and width of 71.9 mm. The volume of the Oppo Find X9 is 92.8184 cm³, while the Vivo X300 has a smaller volume of 86.62512 cm³.

Both phones have the same thickness of 8 mm, and neither features a rugged build or the ability to fold. So, in terms of design and build, the two phones are very similar, with only minor differences in weight, dimensions, and volume.

Overall, the two devices share similar waterproof capabilities and a sleek design, but the Vivo X300 is more compact and lighter than the Oppo Find X9, though both phones have the same thickness.

The Oppo Find X9 and the Vivo X300 both feature OLED/AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth visuals. The screen size differs slightly, with the Oppo Find X9 sporting a larger 6.59″ display compared to the Vivo X300's 6.31″. Both devices have a pixel density of 460 ppi, providing sharp and clear images. In terms of resolution, the Oppo Find X9 offers a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 px, while the Vivo X300 has a resolution of 1216 x 2640 px, resulting in a slight difference in screen clarity.

Both displays support HDR10 and HDR10+, allowing for vibrant colors and improved contrast in supported content. The Oppo Find X9 also supports Dolby Vision, which the Vivo X300 lacks. Additionally, the Oppo Find X9 features branded damage-resistant glass, while the Vivo X300 does not have this protection. Both phones have an Always-On Display feature and a touch screen, with no secondary screen present on either device.

In summary, the Oppo Find X9 offers a larger, higher-resolution display with extra features like Dolby Vision and branded damage-resistant glass, while the Vivo X300 has a more compact screen with similar HDR capabilities but lacks Dolby Vision and the additional protection.

The Oppo Find X9 and the Vivo X300 share identical performance specifications, with both featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, 16GB of RAM, and 1024GB of internal storage. Both devices also have the Mali G1 Ultra MP12 GPU, which operates at a clock speed of 1750 MHz. The CPU configuration is the same across both devices, with 1 core running at 4.21 GHz, 3 cores at 3.5 GHz, and 4 cores at 2.7 GHz, supported by 8 threads. Additionally, both phones score the same on Geekbench 6, with a multi-core score of 12189 and a single-core score of 3781.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and the Vivo X300 also feature the same RAM speed of 5333 MHz, and their GPUs support OpenCL version 3. Both devices support 64-bit architecture and have integrated LTE and graphics. They are built on a 3 nm semiconductor size and include big.LITTLE technology for efficient power distribution. Additionally, both devices support HMP (Heterogeneous Multi-Processing) and multithreading.

In terms of memory bandwidth, both phones have a maximum bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s, and the maximum supported memory is the same at 24GB. Both phones also have the same L3 cache size of 16 MB, and both use DDR5 memory with 128 shading units on the GPU. Therefore, in terms of raw performance and hardware specifications, there is no difference between the Oppo Find X9 and the Vivo X300.

The Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300 both feature a multi-lens main camera setup, with the Oppo Find X9 equipped with three 50 MP lenses, while the Vivo X300 has a 200 MP primary lens paired with two 50 MP lenses. Both phones have a similar wide aperture for their main cameras, with the Oppo Find X9 featuring apertures of 1.6, 2.6, and 2f, while the Vivo X300 uses 1.7, 2.6, and 2f. Both devices also offer optical zoom at 3x, and both feature laser autofocus and phase-detection autofocus for photos. Additionally, both have the ability to record video at 2160 x 60 fps.

The front cameras of both phones are quite powerful, with the Oppo Find X9 boasting a 32 MP front camera, while the Vivo X300 has a significantly higher 50 MP front camera. Both front cameras have a wide aperture (the Oppo Find X9 at 2.4f and the Vivo X300 at 2f) and support features like HDR and slow-motion video recording. The Oppo Find X9 also includes a front-facing LED flash, while the Vivo X300 does not. Both phones support HDR10 recording, but only the Oppo Find X9 offers manual shutter speed control.

In terms of additional camera features, both phones have similar capabilities, including continuous autofocus, manual exposure, raw photo shooting, and the ability to create in-camera panoramas. However, the Oppo Find X9 stands out with its ability to shoot in Dolby Vision and supports manual ISO, while the Vivo X300 does not support Dolby Vision recording and lacks manual shutter speed control. Both phones lack support for 360° panoramas and 3D photo/video recording.

The Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300 both run Android 16, offering a similar set of features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They also allow users to block app tracking, have notification permissions, media pickers, and dark mode. Both phones support features like Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), customizable notifications, and widgets. Additionally, both devices are free and open-source, support offline voice recognition, and allow voice commands. They also track the current position of the mobile device and support a multi-user system.

There are a few areas where the two devices match: neither supports Mail Privacy Protection, Wi-Fi password sharing, or Focus Modes. Both lack direct OS updates and Quick Start functionality. However, both devices can offload apps and support dynamic theming, extra dim mode, battery health checks, and the ability to play games while downloading.

Overall, there are no notable differences in the operating system features between the Oppo Find X9 and the Vivo X300. Both devices offer the same core functionality, with identical privacy, customization, and usability features.

The Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300 both come with wireless charging capabilities and support fast charging, but there are some differences in their battery specifications. The Oppo Find X9 has a larger 7025 mAh battery compared to the Vivo X300’s 6040 mAh. In terms of charging speed, the Oppo Find X9 offers 80W fast charging and 50W wireless charging, while the Vivo X300 supports 90W fast charging and 40W wireless charging. The Oppo Find X9 also supports reverse wireless charging, which the Vivo X300 does not.

Both devices feature a non-removable, rechargeable battery, and both have a battery level indicator to keep users informed of their charge status. However, while the Oppo Find X9 supports reverse wireless charging, a feature the Vivo X300 lacks, both devices support fast and wireless charging. The Vivo X300 does have the advantage of faster wired charging at 90W, though its wireless charging speed is slightly lower than the Oppo Find X9's.

Overall, the Oppo Find X9 offers a larger battery capacity and reverse wireless charging, while the Vivo X300 offers a faster charging speed but has a smaller battery and no reverse wireless charging support.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and the Vivo X300 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack and do not have a radio. However, both phones feature stereo speakers for enhanced audio output. In terms of audio technology, both devices support aptX, allowing for high-quality Bluetooth audio streaming. The Oppo Find X9 does not support LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, while the Vivo X300 supports aptX HD but lacks support for LDAC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless.

Overall, both devices provide stereo sound and aptX support for wireless audio, but the Vivo X300 has an additional advantage with its support for aptX HD, which the Oppo Find X9 does not offer.

In conclusion, both phones are quite similar in audio features, with the Vivo X300 offering a slightly better Bluetooth audio experience due to its support for aptX HD.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300 offer 5G support, 2 SIM cards, and similar Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be). The download speed for both devices is the same at 10700 MBits/s. Both phones are equipped with USB Type-C, NFC, and Bluetooth, but the Oppo Find X9 has Bluetooth version 6, while the Vivo X300 uses Bluetooth version 5.4. Both devices include a fingerprint scanner for security, as well as GPS, a compass, a gyroscope, and an accelerometer for navigation and motion sensing.

Neither phone offers an external memory slot, and neither has emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, or a barometer. Both devices also lack 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, a built-in projector, motion tracking, and optical tracking. Additionally, both phones have infrared sensors, a cellular module, and support Galileo for satellite positioning.

In summary, while both phones share many common connectivity features, including 5G, NFC, and USB Type-C, the Oppo Find X9 has the slight advantage in Bluetooth with version 6 compared to the Vivo X300's Bluetooth 5.4. Otherwise, the devices are nearly identical in terms of features, with neither offering an external memory slot or advanced emergency or tracking functionalities.

Both the Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300 come with a video light, but neither features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays. The specifications in this group are identical for both devices, with no distinguishing factors between them in terms of these particular features.

In summary, the Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300 are the same in this group, offering a video light but lacking advanced display technologies like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.

There are no notable differences between the two products in the miscellaneous category based on the provided specifications.