Oppo Pad 4 Pro VS Vivo Pad 5

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 both have a relatively slim design, but there are a few differences in their dimensions. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro is slightly larger with a width of 289.6 mm and height of 209.7 mm, compared to the Vivo Pad 5's 266.4 mm width and 192 mm height. As a result, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro has a larger volume of 364.37 cm³, while the Vivo Pad 5's volume is 337.58 cm³.

In terms of weight, the Vivo Pad 5 is lighter at 590 g, whereas the Oppo Pad 4 Pro weighs 675 g. Both tablets are quite thin, with the Oppo Pad 4 Pro being 6 mm thick and the Vivo Pad 5 slightly thicker at 6.6 mm.

Neither tablet includes a stylus, has a detachable keyboard, or features a backlit keyboard. Additionally, neither has tilt sensitivity. One key difference is that the Vivo Pad 5 is water-resistant, while the Oppo Pad 4 Pro lacks water resistance.

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 both feature LCD, IPS displays, but there are several differences in their specifications. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro has a larger screen size at 13.2″, compared to the Vivo Pad 5's 12.1″. As a result, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro offers a higher resolution of 3392 x 2400 px, while the Vivo Pad 5's resolution is 2800 x 1968 px. This leads to a slightly higher pixel density on the Oppo Pad 4 Pro with 315 ppi, compared to the Vivo Pad 5's 283 ppi.

Both tablets support a 144Hz refresh rate, but their touch sampling rates differ. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro offers a significantly higher touch sampling rate of 540Hz, while the Vivo Pad 5's touch sampling rate matches its refresh rate at 144Hz. Neither tablet has branded damage-resistant glass or sapphire glass, and neither supports HDR10+ or Dolby Vision.

While both tablets support HDR10, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro does not. Additionally, both devices have a touch screen, and neither features an e-paper display.

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 both offer substantial performance with similar internal storage and RAM configurations, each featuring 512GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM. However, their chipsets differ significantly. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, with a CPU configuration of 2 x 4.32 GHz and 6 x 3.53 GHz, while the Vivo Pad 5 uses the Mediatek Dimensity 9300 Plus, featuring a CPU configuration of 1 x 3.4 GHz, 3 x 2.85 GHz, and 4 x 2 GHz. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro also has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core result of 10059, compared to the Vivo Pad 5's 7547, and a higher single-core result of 3234 versus 2302 for the Vivo Pad 5.

In terms of graphics, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro uses the Adreno 830 GPU, which runs at a clock speed of 1100 MHz, while the Vivo Pad 5 is equipped with the Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU, clocked at 1300 MHz. The Vivo Pad 5 has a slightly higher L3 cache with 18 MB, compared to the Oppo Pad 4 Pro's 8 MB, though the Oppo tablet has a larger L2 cache at 12 MB versus the Vivo's 8 MB.

Other performance aspects such as RAM speed differ slightly, with the Oppo Pad 4 Pro offering faster RAM at 5300 MHz, compared to the Vivo Pad 5's 4800 MHz. The Oppo tablet also has a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 85.1 GB/s, compared to the Vivo Pad 5's 76.8 GB/s. Both devices support 64-bit processing, integrated LTE, big.LITTLE technology, and DirectX 12, with both running Android 15.

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 both have cameras with several common features, but differ in terms of their specifications. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro offers a higher resolution main camera at 13 MP, compared to the Vivo Pad 5's 8 MP main camera. The front cameras also differ, with the Oppo tablet featuring an 8 MP front camera, while the Vivo Pad 5 has a 5 MP front camera. In terms of video recording, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro supports 2160 x 30 fps, while the Vivo Pad 5 is limited to 1080 x 30 fps.

Both tablets include a flash, front camera, and built-in HDR mode. Neither tablet can create panoramas in-camera or shoot 360° panoramas. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro supports slow-motion video recording, but the Vivo Pad 5 does not. Both devices have touch autofocus, manual white balance, and manual focus. They also feature a video light and a single flash LED, though neither has a front-facing LED flash or dual-tone LED flash.

In addition, both tablets offer manual ISO control and manual exposure, but neither includes built-in optical image stabilization or supports 3D photo/video recording capabilities. Other features such as continuous autofocus when recording movies, manual shutter speed, and lack of HDR10 recording and Dolby Vision recording are shared by both devices.

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 have identical audio features in several aspects. Both tablets lack advanced Bluetooth audio codec support such as aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Low Latency, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless. Additionally, neither tablet includes a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users must rely on wireless audio or USB-C adapters for wired audio connections. Neither device is equipped with a radio.

However, both tablets do feature stereo speakers, offering an enhanced audio experience compared to single-speaker designs.

Overall, the audio specifications of both devices are nearly identical, with no significant differences between the two.

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 both offer a large battery capacity, but the Oppo tablet has a higher power rating. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro is equipped with a 12140 mAh battery, while the Vivo Pad 5 has a 10000 mAh battery. Both tablets support fast charging, but neither supports wireless charging.

Both devices feature a battery level indicator and have rechargeable, non-removable batteries. The specifications in this group are otherwise identical between the two tablets, with no additional features or differences in battery design.

Overall, the main difference is in battery capacity, with the Oppo Pad 4 Pro offering a larger battery compared to the Vivo Pad 5.

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 share many connectivity and feature specifications, with both devices supporting the latest Wi-Fi standards, including Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be). Both tablets also offer Bluetooth version 5.4, USB Type-C, and share similar download speeds of 10000 MBits/s, although the Vivo Pad 5 has a higher upload speed at 7000 MBits/s compared to the Oppo Pad 4 Pro's 3500 MBits/s. Neither device includes a fingerprint scanner, NFC, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner.

Both devices are equipped with a gyroscope, accelerometer, and compass, with the Oppo Pad 4 Pro featuring a compass while the Vivo Pad 5 does not. Both tablets support offline voice recognition, voice commands, and have sharing intents, customizable notifications, and support widgets. They also feature dark mode, dynamic theming, and battery health checks.

In terms of privacy and security, both devices have Mail Privacy Protection, location and camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. However, neither supports cross-site tracking blocking or Quick Start, and both are multi-user systems. Neither tablet includes HDMI output, infrared sensors, or a built-in projector. Both have a child lock and can track the current position of the device, but the Vivo Pad 5 has no compass, while the Oppo Pad 4 Pro does.

Both the Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 feature DDR5 memory, providing fast and efficient performance. However, they differ in their use of multithreading. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro supports multithreading, while the Vivo Pad 5 does not utilize this feature. This difference may impact how the devices handle multitasking and complex processing tasks.

In summary, while both tablets are equipped with DDR5 memory, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro's use of multithreading could offer a performance advantage in specific scenarios that benefit from parallel processing.

Overall, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro and Vivo Pad 5 have similar memory capabilities, with the key distinction being the Oppo's support for multithreading.