Oppo Reno14 F 5G VS Vivo V60

The Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 both offer waterproof designs, but with a few differences in other design aspects. The Reno14 F 5G has an IP69 rating, allowing it to withstand water exposure up to 2 meters, while the V60 is rated IP68, which means it can handle immersion up to 1.5 meters.

In terms of physical dimensions, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is slightly lighter, weighing 180 g compared to the Vivo V60's 192 g. The Reno14 F 5G is also a bit thinner at 7.7 mm, whereas the V60 is slightly thinner at 7.5 mm. The width and height of the two devices differ, with the Reno14 F 5G measuring 75 mm in width and 158.1 mm in height, while the V60 is wider at 77 mm and taller at 163.5 mm.

The volume of the two phones also varies, with the Oppo Reno14 F 5G having a total volume of 91.30275 cm³, while the Vivo V60 is slightly larger, measuring 94.42125 cm³. Both phones are not designed with rugged builds, and neither can be folded.

The Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, but they differ in several other aspects. The Reno14 F 5G has a 6.57-inch screen with a pixel density of 397 ppi, while the V60 offers a slightly larger 6.77-inch screen and a lower pixel density of 388 ppi. Both devices have the same resolution of 1080 x 2372 px for the Reno14 F 5G and 1080 x 2392 px for the V60, so the difference in screen size slightly impacts the pixel density.

In terms of brightness, the Vivo V60 outshines the Oppo Reno14 F 5G with a typical brightness of 1500 nits, compared to the 600 nits offered by the Reno14 F 5G. Both phones have a refresh rate of 120Hz, ensuring smooth scrolling and gaming experiences.

When it comes to additional features, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has an Always-On Display, whereas the Vivo V60 does not. Neither phone supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision. Both devices come with branded damage-resistant glass and have touch screens, but neither has a secondary screen.

The Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 share similar internal storage capacities, both offering 512GB. However, the Vivo V60 has an advantage in RAM, featuring 16GB compared to the 12GB of RAM in the Oppo Reno14 F 5G. The chipset in the Reno14 F 5G is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, with a CPU speed of 4 x 2.2 GHz and 4 x 1.8 GHz, while the V60 uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, which has a higher CPU speed of 1 x 2.8 GHz, 4 x 2.4 GHz, and 3 x 1.8 GHz.

The GPU clock speed also differs, with the Oppo Reno14 F 5G having a GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, while the Vivo V60's GPU runs at 1000 MHz. Both devices support integrated LTE and have 4nm semiconductor sizes. They both support 64-bit computing, DirectX 12, integrated graphics, OpenGL ES 3.2, big.LITTLE technology, and TrustZone.

When it comes to memory performance, the Reno14 F 5G features a RAM speed of 2750 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 22 GB/s. In comparison, the Vivo V60 offers faster RAM speed at 4200 MHz and higher memory bandwidth at 33.6 GB/s. The Thermal Design Power (TDP) of the Reno14 F 5G is 7W, slightly higher than the 6W TDP of the V60. Both phones use DDR5 memory and have OpenCL version 2 support.

The Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 both feature multi-lens main cameras, but with some key differences. The Reno14 F 5G has a triple-lens setup with 50 MP, 8 MP, and 2 MP sensors, while the V60 has a more powerful combination of 50 MP, 50 MP, and 8 MP sensors. Both devices have a wide aperture for their main cameras, with the Reno14 F 5G offering 1.8f, 2.2f, and 2.4f, and the V60 providing 1.9f, 2.7f, and 2f. Both phones also support phase-detection autofocus for photos and continuous autofocus for video recording, along with video recording at 2160 x 30 fps.

When it comes to front cameras, the Reno14 F 5G has a 32 MP camera with a wide aperture of 2f, while the V60 has a higher-resolution 50 MP front camera with a slightly wider aperture of 2.2f. Neither device has a front-facing LED flash. Both phones come with features like HDR, manual exposure, manual ISO, serial shot mode, touch autofocus, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. Both support slow-motion video recording and timelapse functions.

In terms of zoom, the Reno14 F 5G lacks optical zoom, while the V60 has a 3x optical zoom, offering greater zoom capabilities. Both phones include a built-in flash, though the V60 has 4 flash LEDs compared to the single LED in the Reno14 F 5G. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, 3D photo/video recording, or has a front-facing camera under the display.

The Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 both run on Android 15, offering a similar suite of features. Both devices come with clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They can block app tracking, but neither blocks cross-site tracking. Both also include on-device machine learning, notification permissions, a media picker, and the ability to play games while they download.

Both phones have dark mode, battery health checks, extra dim modes, and dynamic theming. They can offload apps and offer customizable notifications. Features like Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen support, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and sharing intents are available on both devices. Neither phone gets direct OS updates, and neither can be used as a PC.

Both devices feature a child lock, support widgets, are free and open source, and include offline voice recognition and voice commands. They can track the current position of the device and both support multi-user systems. Neither phone has the Quick Start feature.

The Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 both feature large batteries, with the Reno14 F 5G having a 6000 mAh battery and the V60 offering a slightly larger 6500 mAh battery. Neither device supports wireless charging or reverse wireless charging. However, the two phones differ significantly in their fast charging capabilities. The Reno14 F 5G supports fast charging at a speed of 45W, while the V60 offers a much faster 90W charging speed.

Both devices have non-removable, rechargeable batteries and feature battery level indicators. Neither phone supports removable batteries, but both include rechargeable batteries, ensuring that users can rely on long-lasting power throughout the day.

Both the Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 do not have a 3.5 mm audio jack socket. However, both phones are equipped with stereo speakers for an enhanced audio experience. The Reno14 F 5G supports aptX, aptX HD, and includes aptX Adaptive, whereas the V60 does not support any of the aptX technologies, including aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless.

Neither phone supports LDAC for high-quality audio streaming over Bluetooth, and both lack aptX Lossless, making them similar in terms of Bluetooth audio support. However, the Reno14 F 5G has a broader range of aptX support, offering aptX HD alongside the standard aptX, which the V60 does not.

Both the Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 support 5G connectivity, offering fast mobile data speeds. They are both equipped with Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), allowing for stable wireless connections. Both phones also use dual SIM cards, with the Oppo Reno14 F 5G having an external memory slot, while the Vivo V60 does not.

In terms of Bluetooth, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G features Bluetooth 5.1, while the Vivo V60 has the slightly newer Bluetooth 5.4. Both phones include USB Type-C with USB version 2, NFC, a fingerprint scanner, and GPS functionality. Additionally, both devices have a gyroscope, accelerometer, and cellular module, with the V60 offering an infrared sensor that the Reno14 F 5G lacks.

Neither phone supports emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, or DLNA certification. Both have a compass and support Galileo for satellite positioning. However, neither phone includes features like motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector, and neither uses 3D facial recognition or has an iris scanner.

Both the Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Vivo V60 include a video light feature, which can help improve visibility during low-light video recording. Neither phone features sapphire glass for the display, a curved display, or an e-paper display, meaning both devices have standard flat displays with no advanced display materials or technologies in this category.

Thus, the key similarity between the two phones in this group is the inclusion of a video light, with all other features like sapphire glass, curved displays, and e-paper displays being absent from both devices.