Oppo Reno14 Pro VS Vivo X200 FE

The Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE both offer solid design features, but there are some differences in their specifications. In terms of water resistance, the Oppo Reno14 Pro is waterproof with an IP68 rating, while the Vivo X200 FE is only water resistant with an IP69 rating. Both are highly resistant to water and dust, but the Oppo Reno14 Pro provides a slightly higher level of protection against immersion.

When it comes to size and weight, the Oppo Reno14 Pro is slightly heavier at 201 g, compared to the Vivo X200 FE, which weighs 186 g. The Oppo device is also slightly larger in terms of thickness, at 7.5 mm, compared to the Vivo's 8 mm. The Oppo Reno14 Pro is taller at 163.4 mm, with a width of 77 mm, while the Vivo X200 FE is more compact, measuring 150.8 mm in height and 71.8 mm in width. These differences may affect the handling and portability of the devices.

Regarding the overall volume, the Oppo Reno14 Pro has a larger volume of 94.36 cm³, while the Vivo X200 FE is smaller at 86.62 cm³. Neither device offers a rugged build or the ability to fold, which means they are both designed as standard smartphones, focused on sleekness and portability without additional durability features like rugged designs or folding mechanisms.

Both the Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE feature OLED/AMOLED displays, but there are a few differences in their display specifications. The Oppo Reno14 Pro has a larger 6.83-inch screen, while the Vivo X200 FE is more compact at 6.31 inches. This makes the Oppo display slightly bigger, offering more screen real estate.

In terms of pixel density, the Vivo X200 FE has a slightly higher 461 ppi compared to the Oppo Reno14 Pro’s 450 ppi. However, both displays are quite sharp and should offer crisp visuals. The resolution also differs, with the Oppo Reno14 Pro sporting a higher 1272 x 2800 px resolution, while the Vivo X200 FE has a 1216 x 2640 px resolution, which is still impressive but lower than the Oppo's.

Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and animations. Additionally, both have branded damage-resistant glass and support Always-On Display. The Oppo Reno14 Pro supports HDR10 and HDR10+, while the Vivo X200 FE lacks support for both. Neither device supports Dolby Vision or has a secondary screen, and both have a touch screen.

The Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE are both powerful devices with different performance capabilities. The Oppo Reno14 Pro comes with 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, while the Vivo X200 FE offers 512GB of storage and 12GB of RAM. This gives the Oppo a clear advantage in terms of storage and RAM capacity.

Both phones have impressive benchmark scores, with the Oppo Reno14 Pro scoring 1,675,100 on AnTuTu and the Vivo X200 FE achieving a higher score of 1,793,117. The Vivo also outperforms the Oppo in Geekbench 6 results, with a multi-core score of 7,547 and a single-core score of 2,302, compared to the Oppo's multi-core score of 6,033 and single-core score of 1,571.

Both devices use a 4 nm semiconductor and support 64-bit processing. They also share similar GPU clock speeds of 1300 MHz, GPU models (Mali G720 MC7 for the Oppo and Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 for the Vivo), and support DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2. However, the Vivo X200 FE has higher RAM speed at 4800 MHz compared to the Oppo's 4267 MHz, and a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, compared to the Oppo's 68.2 GB/s. The Oppo Reno14 Pro, however, has a larger L3 cache (6 MB) compared to the Vivo's 18 MB L2 cache. Both phones feature big.LITTLE technology and have 8 CPU threads, HMP support, and integrated graphics.

The Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE both offer impressive camera setups, but there are a few differences in their specifications. Both phones feature a triple-lens main camera, with the Oppo Reno14 Pro offering a 50MP + 50MP + 50MP setup and the Vivo X200 FE featuring a 50MP + 50MP + 8MP configuration. The wide apertures for their main cameras are also slightly different, with the Oppo using f/1.8, f/2.8, and f/2.0 and the Vivo using f/1.9, f/2.7, and f/2.2.

Both devices support 2160p video recording at 60 fps and have optical image stabilization built into their main cameras. The Oppo Reno14 Pro offers 3.5x optical zoom, while the Vivo X200 FE provides 3x optical zoom, so the Oppo has a slight edge in zoom capability. Both phones have phase-detection autofocus for photos and continuous autofocus for video, and both support slow-motion video recording and manual exposure control. They also feature a single LED flash, but neither has a dual-tone LED flash.

For the front camera, both phones have a 50MP sensor with a wide aperture of f/2.0. Neither phone includes a front-facing LED flash or a multi-lens front camera, and both devices support timelapse and panorama creation. The Vivo X200 FE is the only one of the two to offer laser autofocus, which is not present on the Oppo Reno14 Pro. Both phones lack support for HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, and 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Both the Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE run on Android 15 and share a similar set of privacy and customization features. Both devices offer clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. They also support theme customization, dark mode, dynamic theming, customizable notifications, and full-page screenshots. Neither device provides Mail Privacy Protection or Wi-Fi password sharing, though they both offer a battery health check and extra dim mode.

In terms of functionality, both phones support features like playing games while they download, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, split screen, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), sharing intents, and offline voice recognition. They also both allow users to track the current position of the device, use voice commands, and provide a multi-user system. However, neither device supports Quick Start or the ability to be used as a PC.

Where the two phones differ is in the support for Focus Modes. The Oppo Reno14 Pro does not have focus modes, while the Vivo X200 FE also lacks this feature. Both devices support widgets, but the Oppo Reno14 Pro can offload apps, while the Vivo X200 FE does not provide this information. Additionally, neither phone supports PiP in a way that differentiates them in terms of advanced video multitasking.

The Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE differ slightly in their battery specifications. The Oppo Reno14 Pro is equipped with a 6200 mAh battery, while the Vivo X200 FE features a slightly larger 6500 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the Oppo Reno14 Pro offers a charging speed of 80W, while the Vivo X200 FE supports a faster 90W charging speed.

In terms of charging features, the Oppo Reno14 Pro supports wireless charging, which the Vivo X200 FE does not. Both phones come with a charger, have a rechargeable battery, and feature a battery level indicator. Neither device has a removable battery.

Both devices are similar in terms of overall battery functionality, offering fast charging and rechargeable batteries, but the Oppo Reno14 Pro's wireless charging capability and the Vivo X200 FE's higher charging speed are key distinctions between the two models.

Both the Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE share similar audio features, with neither device offering a 3.5 mm audio jack. Both phones come equipped with stereo speakers, providing an enhanced audio experience. In terms of wireless audio, both devices support aptX, aptX HD, and lack LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, and radio functionality.

There are no significant differences between the two phones in this category, as both offer the same aptX and aptX HD support, stereo speakers, and lack a 3.5 mm audio jack. Additionally, neither device supports a radio or advanced audio technologies like LDAC or aptX Lossless.

Overall, the audio experience on both devices is quite similar, with high-quality Bluetooth audio support but no support for traditional wired audio or advanced audio codecs.

Both the Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE offer 5G support and share several connectivity features. Both devices support dual SIM cards and have Wi-Fi capabilities, including Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 6, with the Vivo X200 FE additionally supporting Wi-Fi 7. They both feature Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, USB Type-C (USB version 2), and have a fingerprint scanner. Additionally, both phones lack an external memory slot and have no support for memory expansion.

In terms of download speed, the Vivo X200 FE offers a significantly higher download speed of 10,000 MBits/s compared to the Oppo Reno14 Pro’s 5,170 MBits/s. Both devices include standard features like a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, compass, and an infrared sensor. Neither phone supports motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector.

Other common features include the lack of a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, or heart rate monitor. Both devices support Galileo, and neither offers emergency SOS via satellite or crash detection. While both phones have a cellular module and support Wi-Fi, neither device has a DLNA certification.

Both the Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE share similar features in the miscellaneous category. They both come with a video light, which can help in low-light situations, but neither device has sapphire glass or a curved display. Additionally, neither phone features an e-paper display.

There are no significant differences between the two phones in this group, as both devices share the same specifications regarding the video light, display type, and lack of an e-paper display or sapphire glass.

Overall, the miscellaneous features of the Oppo Reno14 Pro and Vivo X200 FE are identical, with no major distinctions between the two devices in terms of unique display technologies or additional features.