Oukitel WP300 VS Xiaomi Poco F7

In terms of design, the Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 both offer waterproofing, but the Oukitel WP300 comes with an IP67 rating, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 is rated IP68, which may offer slightly more protection against dust and water immersion. The Oukitel WP300 has a rugged build, designed to withstand harsh conditions, while the Poco F7 lacks this rugged feature.

Looking at the size and weight, the Oukitel WP300 is significantly heavier and bulkier. It weighs 512 g, has a thickness of 23.2 mm, and a larger volume of 338.94 cm³. In contrast, the Poco F7 is much lighter at 215.7 g, with a slim thickness of 8.2 mm and a smaller volume of 104.19 cm³.

For dimensions, the Oukitel WP300 is also larger in height (177.3 mm) and width (82.4 mm) compared to the Poco F7, which stands at 163.1 mm in height and 77.9 mm in width. Both phones are non-foldable, so there’s no difference there.

The Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 both feature touchscreens and branded damage-resistant glass. The Oukitel WP300 uses Gorilla Glass 5, while the Poco F7 is equipped with Gorilla Glass 7i, which may offer improved durability. The display type also differs; the WP300 has an LCD, IPS display, whereas the Poco F7 has an OLED/AMOLED display, which typically provides better contrast and color saturation.

In terms of screen size, the Oukitel WP300 has a 6.8″ display, while the Poco F7 is slightly larger at 6.83″. The Oukitel WP300 has a pixel density of 395 ppi, compared to the Poco F7’s 447 ppi, making the Poco F7's display slightly sharper. The resolution of the WP300 is 1080 x 2460 px, whereas the Poco F7 offers a higher resolution of 1280 x 2772 px, which contributes to its higher pixel density.

The Oukitel WP300 does not support HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or Always-On Display, while the Poco F7 supports HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, and also features Always-On Display. Additionally, neither device has a secondary screen.

Both the Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 come with 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, ensuring ample space and multitasking capability. However, the performance differences become evident in other specs. The Oukitel WP300 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 chipset with a CPU clocked at 2 x 2.6 GHz and 6 x 2 GHz. In contrast, the Poco F7 has the more powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, with a CPU featuring higher clock speeds of 3 x 3.01 GHz, 2 x 2.8 GHz, 2 x 2.02 GHz, and 1 x 3.21 GHz, giving it a noticeable advantage in processing power.

The Oukitel WP300 scores 550,000 on the AnTuTu benchmark, while the Poco F7 significantly outperforms it with a score of 2,084,535. Additionally, the Geekbench 6 scores for the WP300 are 936 (single-core) and 2257 (multi-core), while the Poco F7 boasts much higher results of 2041 (single-core) and 6833 (multi-core), reflecting its more powerful performance. The GPU clock speed in the WP300 is 950 MHz, compared to the Poco F7’s 1150 MHz, which suggests that the Poco F7’s GPU is more capable.

Other specifications show additional differences: the WP300’s GPU is the Mali G68 MP4 with 4 execution units, whereas the Poco F7 has the Adreno 825 GPU with 3 execution units. The WP300’s RAM speed is 3200 MHz, whereas the Poco F7’s is 4800 MHz, allowing for faster data access on the Poco F7. The WP300 uses a 6 nm semiconductor, while the Poco F7 uses a more advanced 4 nm process. The maximum memory capacity of the WP300 is 16GB, while the Poco F7 supports up to 24GB of RAM. Finally, the WP300 has a lower TDP of 5W compared to the Poco F7’s 12.5W, indicating different thermal management capabilities.

The Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 both feature dual-lens main cameras, but with different megapixel configurations. The Oukitel WP300 has a 108 MP primary sensor and a 2 MP secondary sensor, while the Poco F7 is equipped with a 50 MP primary camera and an 8 MP secondary sensor. Both devices feature phase-detection autofocus and continuous autofocus during video recording, supporting slow-motion video recording and a built-in HDR mode.

For front-facing cameras, the Oukitel WP300 has a 32 MP camera, while the Poco F7 comes with a 20 MP front camera. The Oukitel’s front camera has a wider aperture of f/2, while the Poco F7’s front camera has an aperture of f/2.2. Both phones support in-camera panorama creation and have manual exposure control, but the Poco F7 adds the ability to shoot in RAW and includes a timelapse function, features that the Oukitel WP300 lacks.

Both phones lack built-in optical image stabilization, front-facing LED flashes, and 3D photo/video capabilities. The Oukitel WP300 has a BSI sensor, while the Poco F7 does not, although the Poco F7 does include two flash LEDs compared to the WP300’s three. Neither phone supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both have CMOS sensors with touch autofocus, but neither features laser autofocus, a front-facing camera under the display, or RGB LED flash.

Both the Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 run Android 15 and share many privacy and customization features. They both offer clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy settings. They also support theme customization, blocking app tracking, and on-device machine learning. Additionally, both devices allow for games to be played while they download, have dark mode, and include features like customizable notifications, Live Text, and full-page screenshots.

The Xiaomi Poco F7, however, has Wi-Fi password sharing, which the Oukitel WP300 does not. Both devices lack focus modes, Quick Start, and direct OS updates. They also both support split-screen functionality, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and widgets. The WP300 includes features like battery health check, an extra dim mode, and offline voice recognition, while the Poco F7 shares these features as well. Additionally, both phones are free and open-source, support voice commands, and track the current position of the mobile device.

In terms of differences, there are no notable variations in the core operating system features between the two products. Both offer similar privacy controls, multi-user systems, and a child lock. The WP300 has no Wi-Fi password sharing, while the Poco F7 includes it. Additionally, the WP300 does not have the Quick Start feature, though this is consistent across both devices.

The Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 differ significantly in terms of battery power. The WP300 boasts a massive 16,000 mAh battery, while the Poco F7 has a smaller 6,500 mAh battery. Both devices feature rechargeable batteries and include a battery level indicator. However, neither device supports wireless charging.

Both phones support fast charging, but the WP300 charges at a slower rate of 45W, whereas the Poco F7 supports faster charging at 90W. The WP300 comes with a charger, while the Poco F7 does not. Neither device has a removable battery.

Overall, while both devices offer fast charging capabilities, the Oukitel WP300 has a much larger battery, while the Poco F7 has a higher charging speed and lacks the charger in the box.

Both the Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack and a built-in radio. However, the Poco F7 offers stereo speakers, while the WP300 does not. When it comes to audio technology, the Poco F7 supports multiple high-quality Bluetooth audio codecs including aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive. In contrast, the Oukitel WP300 lacks support for all of these advanced Bluetooth audio technologies, including aptX and LDAC.

Neither phone supports aptX Lossless, and both devices have no radio functionality. The audio capabilities of the two phones differ primarily in the inclusion of stereo speakers and a broader set of Bluetooth audio codec support on the Poco F7.

Both the Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 support 5G connectivity, enabling faster mobile data speeds. The Oukitel WP300 offers Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), while the Poco F7 supports Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, as well as Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), providing more advanced Wi-Fi options for the Poco F7. The Oukitel WP300 has a Bluetooth 5.2 version, while the Poco F7 uses Bluetooth 6, indicating a more recent Bluetooth version on the Poco F7.

The Oukitel WP300 has an external memory slot for expandable storage, which the Poco F7 lacks. Both phones feature USB Type-C with USB 2.0 support, NFC, and fingerprint scanners for security. The WP300 supports a download speed of 2770 MBits/s and an upload speed of 1250 MBits/s, whereas the Poco F7 offers higher download speeds of 4200 MBits/s and upload speeds of 3500 MBits/s.

Regarding sensors, both devices have a gyroscope, compass, accelerometer, GPS, and cellular modules. The Poco F7 additionally features an infrared sensor, which the WP300 lacks. Neither phone includes a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, stylus, motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector. Both devices support Galileo, but the WP300 lacks an infrared sensor, a feature found on the Poco F7.

Both the Oukitel WP300 and Xiaomi Poco F7 feature a video light, which can assist in low-light video recording. Neither device includes sapphire glass display protection, curved displays, or e-paper displays, as all these features are absent in both models.

In summary, the key similarity between the two phones in this group is the presence of a video light. Beyond that, both models lack premium display features like sapphire glass or curved/e-paper displays.