Oukitel WP60 VS Xiaomi Poco C71

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 have notable differences in their design specifications. The WP60 has a rugged build, with a waterproof rating of IP69, while the Poco C71 offers water resistance with an IP52 rating. This indicates that the WP60 is better suited for more extreme conditions, offering greater protection against dust and water.

In terms of weight, the Oukitel WP60 is significantly heavier at 360 g compared to the Poco C71's 193 g. The WP60 is also bulkier, with a thickness of 14.9 mm, while the Poco C71 is slimmer at 8.3 mm. The WP60 is larger in all dimensions, measuring 87 mm in width, 184 mm in height, and with a volume of 238.5 cm³. The Poco C71 is smaller, with a width of 77.8 mm, a height of 171.8 mm, and a volume of 110.9 cm³.

Both devices cannot be folded, and the Oukitel WP60 has a larger volume and a more robust design, while the Poco C71 is lighter and thinner, making it a more portable option.

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 both feature LCD, IPS displays, but there are some notable differences in their specifications. The WP60 has a larger screen size of 7.2″ compared to the Poco C71's 6.88″ display. Despite the larger screen, the WP60 has a higher pixel density of 400 ppi, while the Poco C71 is lower at 260 ppi. The WP60 offers a resolution of 720 x 1560 px, while the Poco C71 has a slightly higher resolution of 720 x 1640 px.

Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth motion on both screens. However, the WP60 benefits from branded damage-resistant glass, whereas the Poco C71 does not have this feature. Neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or Always-On Display, and both lack a secondary screen.

In terms of contrast ratio, the Poco C71 has a higher value of 1500:1, compared to the WP60’s 1200:1. Both devices include touchscreens, ensuring interactive use of the displays.

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 differ significantly in performance-related specifications. The WP60 boasts much higher internal storage at 512GB, compared to the Poco C71's 128GB. Similarly, the WP60 also features more RAM, with 16GB, while the Poco C71 is equipped with 6GB of RAM.

In terms of processing power, the WP60 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 chipset, which has a CPU speed of 2 x 2.5 GHz and 6 x 2 GHz cores, offering a higher clock speed compared to the Poco C71's Unisoc T7250 chipset with 2 x 1.8 GHz and 6 x 1.6 GHz cores. As for benchmark scores, the WP60 outperforms the Poco C71 with an AnTuTu score of 485008, versus 308681 for the Poco C71. Geekbench 6 scores show a similar trend, with the WP60 achieving 2291 in multi-core and 884 in single-core, while the Poco C71 scores 1461 and 437, respectively.

Graphics-wise, the WP60 features the IMG BXM-8-256 GPU with a clock speed of 900 MHz, while the Poco C71 uses the Mali G57 GPU at a clock speed of 850 MHz. The WP60's GPU is slightly more powerful, and its RAM operates at a faster speed of 2750 MHz, compared to the Poco C71's 1866 MHz. Additionally, the WP60 has a semiconductor size of 6 nm, while the Poco C71 uses a larger 12 nm size, indicating differences in manufacturing process efficiency. Both devices support 64-bit architecture and use big.LITTLE technology, with the WP60 supporting up to 16GB of RAM and the Poco C71 supporting up to 12GB.

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 offer different camera setups with varying features. The WP60 features a triple-lens main camera with 108 MP, 8 MP, and 2 MP sensors, while the Poco C71 has a single 32 MP main camera. The WP60 supports a dual-tone LED flash with 2 flash LEDs, whereas the Poco C71 uses a single flash LED without a dual-tone setup.

For the front camera, the WP60 has a significantly higher 32 MP sensor, while the Poco C71 comes with an 8 MP front camera. Both phones support phase-detection autofocus for photos, have manual exposure controls, and feature touch autofocus. Additionally, both devices allow for in-camera panorama creation and support continuous autofocus when recording movies.

In terms of additional features, the WP60 offers more advanced camera controls with options like manual ISO, serial shot mode, manual focus, and manual white balance. The Poco C71 shares most of these features but does not include the dual-tone flash or the higher-end front camera of the WP60. Neither phone supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, shoots raw, or has 3D photo/video capabilities.

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 run different versions of Android. The WP60 operates on Android 14, while the Poco C71 runs on Android 15. Both devices have similar privacy and security features, such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. Neither device includes Mail Privacy Protection, but both offer theme customization, notification permissions, and media pickers.

In terms of functionality, both phones allow for game downloads while playing, support dark mode, and include features like Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health check, extra dim mode, and dynamic theming. The WP60 cannot offload apps, while the Poco C71 can. Additionally, both devices support split screen, PiP, and customizable notifications, and both include Live Text and full-page screenshots. They also support widgets, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and a multi-user system.

There are some features present on both devices that are identical, such as PiP, voice recognition, and tracking the mobile device’s current position. However, neither phone can be used as a PC or has Quick Start. The WP60 lacks app offloading, which is supported by the Poco C71, but both devices offer robust privacy features and user customizations.

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 differ significantly in battery specifications. The WP60 has a much larger battery capacity of 10000 mAh, while the Poco C71 is equipped with a 5200 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the WP60 supports faster charging at 33W, compared to the Poco C71's 15W charging speed.

Neither phone has wireless charging, and both feature a rechargeable, non-removable battery. Both devices also include a battery level indicator, allowing users to monitor their battery status easily.

In terms of battery capacity and charging speed, the WP60 offers a significant advantage with its higher power and faster charging capability, making it more suitable for users who prioritize longer battery life and quicker charging times.

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 offer different audio features. The WP60 does not have a 3.5 mm audio jack, whereas the Poco C71 includes a socket for wired audio. The WP60 is equipped with stereo speakers, while the Poco C71 does not feature stereo speakers.

Neither device supports advanced audio codecs like aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. However, both phones do have a radio, allowing users to listen to FM radio stations.

In terms of audio connectivity, the WP60 offers stereo speakers for enhanced sound, while the Poco C71 offers the flexibility of a 3.5 mm audio jack but lacks stereo speakers.

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 differ in several connectivity and feature specifications. The WP60 supports 5G, while the Poco C71 does not. Both devices support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) and feature 2 SIM card slots, USB Type-C (version 2), and Bluetooth 5.2.

The WP60 offers faster download speeds at 2770 MBits/s, compared to the Poco C71's 300 MBits/s. The WP60 also includes NFC, while the Poco C71 lacks this feature. Both phones have a fingerprint scanner, GPS, accelerometer, and support Galileo. The Poco C71 additionally includes a compass, which the WP60 does not have.

Neither device has features like infrared sensors, barometers, or HDMI outputs, and both lack emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, or 3D facial recognition. Both devices support the use of external memory cards and include features like motion tracking, optical tracking, and a built-in projector are not available on either device.

The Oukitel WP60 and Xiaomi Poco C71 share some common features in the miscellaneous category. Both devices have a video light, allowing for enhanced lighting when recording videos in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays.

Both phones have identical specifications in this group, with no differences between them in terms of display features or additional lighting capabilities.

Overall, the two devices are quite similar in this category, both lacking any advanced display technologies like sapphire glass or curved screens, but providing video lighting for improved video recording quality.