Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual
Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB

Overview

Welcome to our in-depth specification comparison between the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB. Both cards share the same Blackwell architecture, 8GB GDDR7 memory, and a rich feature set, yet they diverge in key areas such as raw compute performance and power consumption. Read on to discover how these two cards stack up across every major spec category.

Common Features

  • Both cards have a GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz.
  • Both cards have 48 render output units (ROPs).
  • Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) is supported on both cards.
  • Both cards have an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz.
  • Both cards offer a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • Both cards have 8GB of VRAM.
  • Both cards use GDDR7 memory.
  • Both cards have a 128-bit memory bus width.
  • ECC memory is supported on both cards.
  • Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate.
  • Both cards have an OpenGL version of 4.6.
  • Both cards have an OpenCL version of 3.
  • Multi-display technology is supported on both cards.
  • Ray tracing is supported on both cards.
  • 3D support is available on both cards.
  • DLSS is supported on both cards.
  • XeSS (XMX) is not available on either card.
  • Both cards have an HDMI 2.1b output.
  • Both cards have 1 HDMI port and 3 DisplayPort outputs, with no USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.
  • Both cards are based on the Blackwell GPU architecture, built on a 5 nm process with 21900 million transistors, using PCIe 5, and share the same physical dimensions of 262.1 mm width and 126.3 mm height.

Main Differences

  • GPU base clock speed is 2280 MHz on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and 2407 MHz on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB.
  • GPU turbo clock speed is 2497 MHz on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and 2632 MHz on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB.
  • Pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and 126.3 GPixel/s on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB.
  • Floating-point performance is 19.18 TFLOPS on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and 24.26 TFLOPS on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB.
  • Texture rate is 299.6 GTexels/s on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and 379 GTexels/s on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB.
  • Shading units number 3840 on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and 4608 on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB.
  • Texture mapping units (TMUs) total 120 on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and 144 on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB.
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP) is 145W on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual and 180W on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB.
Specs Comparison
Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB

Performance:
GPU clock speed 2280 MHz 2407 MHz
GPU turbo 2497 MHz 2632 MHz
pixel rate 119.9 GPixel/s 126.3 GPixel/s
floating-point performance 19.18 TFLOPS 24.26 TFLOPS
texture rate 299.6 GTexels/s 379 GTexels/s
GPU memory speed 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
shading units 3840 4608
texture mapping units (TMUs) 120 144
render output units (ROPs) 48 48
Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)

The most decisive performance gap between these two cards lies in their shader and compute resources. The RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB packs 4,608 shading units and 144 TMUs against the RTX 5060 Dual's 3,840 shading units and 120 TMUs — a 20% advantage in raw parallel processing capacity. This translates directly into the floating-point performance figures: 24.26 TFLOPS versus 19.18 TFLOPS, a roughly 26% lead for the Ti. In practice, that gap shows up in compute-heavy workloads like ray tracing, AI-accelerated features, and shader-intensive scenes, where the Ti variant will sustain noticeably higher frame rates under load.

Clock speeds reinforce this picture. The Ti's base and boost clocks (2,407 / 2,632 MHz) run meaningfully higher than the standard 5060's (2,280 / 2,497 MHz), contributing to its superior texture throughput of 379 GTexels/s compared to 299.6 GTexels/s. Both cards share the same 48 ROPs and identical 1,750 MHz memory speed, so pixel fill rate is nearly tied (126.3 vs. 119.9 GPixel/s) and memory bandwidth is equal — meaning neither card has a rasterization bottleneck advantage at the output stage, but the Ti still leads everywhere upstream.

Overall, the RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB holds a clear performance edge in this group. Its ~26% lead in compute throughput and ~26% advantage in texture rate are not marginal differences — they represent a meaningful step up for demanding rendering workloads. The standard RTX 5060 Dual remains competitive for lighter use cases, but buyers prioritizing raw GPU horsepower should consider the Ti the stronger option based solely on these specs.

Memory:
effective memory speed 28000 MHz 28000 MHz
maximum memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 448 GB/s
VRAM 8GB 8GB
GDDR version GDDR7 GDDR7
memory bus width 128-bit 128-bit
Supports ECC memory

Across every memory specification provided, these two cards are completely identical. Both feature 8GB of GDDR7 running at an effective speed of 28,000 MHz over a 128-bit bus, yielding 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth — and both support ECC memory for error-corrected workloads.

The bandwidth figure deserves some context: 448 GB/s is a strong result for a 128-bit bus, made possible specifically by GDDR7's high efficiency. That said, the 128-bit interface does impose a ceiling, and in scenarios that are heavily memory-bandwidth-bound — such as high-resolution texture streaming or large generative AI models — both cards will hit the same wall at the same time. Neither has a buffer advantage here.

This group is a clear tie. Memory configuration is not a differentiating factor between the RTX 5060 Dual and the RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB. Buyers whose workloads are sensitive to VRAM capacity or bandwidth should treat both cards as equivalent on this dimension and look to other spec groups — particularly performance — to inform their decision.

Features:
DirectX version DirectX 12 Ultimate DirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 3 3
Supports multi-display technology
supports ray tracing
Supports 3D
supports DLSS
has XeSS (XMX)
AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR
has LHR
has RGB lighting
supported displays 4 4

Feature parity is complete between these two cards. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and ray tracing, meaning neither has an edge in API compatibility or access to hardware-accelerated lighting and shadow effects in supported titles. Equally, both carry DLSS support — NVIDIA's AI-driven upscaling technology — which is arguably the most practically impactful feature on this list, allowing games to render at lower resolutions and reconstruct sharp, high-resolution output with minimal visual loss.

A few other shared traits are worth contextualizing. Intel Resizable BAR support on both cards allows the CPU to access the full GPU frame buffer simultaneously rather than in smaller chunks, which can yield modest but real frame rate improvements in compatible systems. The 4-display output limit is standard for this segment and sufficient for virtually all multi-monitor setups. Neither card carries LHR (Lite Hash Rate) restrictions, though this is largely a non-issue in current use.

With zero differences across every feature data point provided, this group is an unambiguous tie. Software capabilities, API support, and peripheral features offer no basis for choosing one card over the other — buyers should rely entirely on performance and other hardware specs to differentiate these two products.

Ports:
has an HDMI output
HDMI ports 1 1
HDMI version HDMI 2.1b HDMI 2.1b
DisplayPort outputs 3 3
USB-C ports 0 0
DVI outputs 0 0
mini DisplayPort outputs 0 0

Both cards ship with an identical port configuration: one HDMI 2.1b output and three DisplayPort outputs, totaling four display connections — matching the four-display limit noted in the Features group. HDMI 2.1b is the latest revision of the standard, supporting very high refresh rates at 4K and beyond, as well as features like Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), making it well-suited for modern TVs and high-end monitors alike. The three DisplayPort outputs provide additional flexibility for multi-monitor desktop setups or high-bandwidth displays.

Neither card offers USB-C, mini DisplayPort, or DVI outputs. The absence of USB-C is worth noting for users who own USB-C or Thunderbolt-based displays, as an adapter would be required. However, this is consistent with the broader GPU market at this tier and not a disadvantage unique to either card.

Port selection is another tie. The connectivity layout is byte-for-byte identical between the RTX 5060 Dual and the RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB, so display compatibility and multi-monitor capability play no role in differentiating these two products.

General info:
GPU architecture Blackwell Blackwell
release date May 2025 April 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 145W 180W
PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 5
semiconductor size 5 nm 5 nm
number of transistors 21900 million 21900 million
Has air-water cooling
width 262.1 mm 262.1 mm
height 126.3 mm 126.3 mm

Sharing the same Blackwell architecture, 5nm process node, and identical transistor count of 21,900 million, these two cards are built from the same generational foundation. The same die, the same fabrication process — yet as seen in the Performance group, the Ti extracts meaningfully more throughput. That gap has a direct cost: the RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB carries a 180W TDP versus the standard RTX 5060 Dual's 145W, a 35W — roughly 24% — difference in peak power draw.

That 35W delta has real-world implications beyond the electricity bill. It sets a higher floor for PSU headroom requirements, and in small form factor or thermally constrained builds, it can meaningfully affect case temperatures and fan noise under sustained load. Users with older or lower-wattage power supplies should factor this in. Both cards rely solely on air cooling with no hybrid option, so thermal management falls entirely on airflow and the cooler design.

Physical dimensions are identical at 262.1 × 126.3 mm, so chassis compatibility is a non-issue. On balance, the standard RTX 5060 Dual holds a practical edge in this group for power-sensitive builds — it delivers its performance at a notably lower thermal and electrical cost. The Ti's higher TDP is the expected trade-off for its superior compute output, but buyers in compact systems or with constrained power budgets should weigh that 35W gap carefully.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After examining all the data, both cards offer a strong foundation: identical 8GB GDDR7 memory with 448 GB/s bandwidth, the same display output configuration, and full support for ray tracing and DLSS. However, the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB pulls ahead with a higher turbo clock of 2632 MHz, 4608 shading units, and a substantially greater floating-point performance of 24.26 TFLOPS, making it the stronger choice for demanding workloads. The Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual, with its lower 145W TDP, is the more power-efficient option for users who want capable Blackwell-generation performance without the added power draw. Your choice ultimately comes down to how much performance headroom you need versus how lean you want your system to run.

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual
Buy Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual if...

Buy the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Dual if you want a power-efficient Blackwell GPU and your system has stricter TDP constraints, since it draws only 145W while still delivering solid performance.

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB
Buy Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB if...

Buy the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB if you want maximum performance, as its higher turbo clock of 2632 MHz, 4608 shading units, and 24.26 TFLOPS floating-point output make it the clear choice for more demanding tasks.