Razer Blade 14 (2025) 14" VS Razer Blade 16 (2025) 16"

The Razer Blade 14 (2025) and Razer Blade 16 (2025) are both gaming laptops, with similar design characteristics but notable differences in size and weight. The Razer Blade 14 is lighter, weighing 1630 g, compared to the Razer Blade 16, which weighs 2140 g. This makes the Blade 14 more portable, especially for users who prioritize mobility. Both models feature a backlit keyboard, enhancing their usability in low-light conditions, and neither uses a fanless design, meaning both rely on active cooling systems.

In terms of size, the Blade 14 is more compact, with dimensions of 310 mm in width, 224 mm in height, and a thickness of 16 mm. The Blade 16, being larger, measures 355 mm in width, 250 mm in height, and has a thickness of 17 mm. The Blade 16 is also bulkier overall, with a larger volume of 1508.75 cm³, compared to the Blade 14’s 1111.04 cm³.

Both laptops come with a one-year warranty period and neither is weather-sealed or has a rugged build, indicating that both are designed for indoor, typical gaming use rather than for durability against the elements.

The Razer Blade 14 (2025) and Razer Blade 16 (2025) both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Blade 14 offers a 14″ screen size, while the Blade 16 has a larger 16″ display. In terms of resolution, the Blade 14 has a higher pixel count at 2880 x 1800 px, compared to the Blade 16's 2560 x 1600 px. This results in a higher pixel density of 242 ppi for the Blade 14, compared to 188 ppi for the Blade 16.

Both models have a 120Hz refresh rate for the Blade 14 and a 240Hz refresh rate for the Blade 16, with the latter offering a smoother experience for fast-paced gaming. Neither product includes a touch screen or an anti-reflection coating, so they both rely on traditional non-touch interfaces without enhanced glare reduction.

Both laptops support up to 4 external displays, offering flexibility for users who need additional screen real estate for productivity or gaming setups.

Both the Razer Blade 14 (2025) and Razer Blade 16 (2025) come equipped with 64GB of RAM running at 8000 MHz, offering plenty of memory for demanding tasks. They also both use flash storage, with 2048GB of internal storage on each. However, the Blade 14 has a CPU with 10 cores running at 2 GHz and 20 threads, while the Blade 16 features a more powerful CPU with 12 cores at 2 GHz and 24 threads. This means the Blade 16 has more processing power for parallel tasks.

The Blade 14 is equipped with 8GB of VRAM, while the Blade 16 boasts 24GB, which provides a significant difference in potential graphics performance, especially for tasks like gaming or 3D rendering. The floating-point performance of the Blade 14 is 23.22 TFLOPS, whereas the Blade 16 is more powerful in this regard, delivering 31.8 TFLOPS. Additionally, the Blade 14 has a higher texture rate of 362.9 GTexels/s compared to the Blade 16’s 496.9 GTexels/s, and a pixel rate of 121 GPixel/s versus the Blade 16’s 193.9 GPixel/s, indicating a clear advantage for the Blade 16 in graphical throughput.

Both products feature an NVMe SSD, support DirectX 12 Ultimate, and use multithreading. The Blade 14 has a turbo clock speed of 5 GHz and a GPU turbo of 2520 MHz, while the Blade 16 has a slightly higher turbo clock speed of 5.1 GHz but a lower GPU turbo of 1515 MHz. Both use PCI Express (PCIe) version 4, have a semiconductor size of 4 nm, and support 64-bit architecture. Neither product has XeSS (XMX) support, and both have a maximum memory amount of 256GB for the Blade 14, while the Blade 16 is limited to 64GB of maximum memory.

The Razer Blade 14 (2025) and Razer Blade 16 (2025) show notable differences in benchmark performance. In the Geekbench 6 multi-core test, the Blade 14 scores 12581, while the Blade 16 scores slightly higher at 13283. For single-core performance, the Blade 14 achieves 2533, while the Blade 16 is marginally better with a score of 2593.

Looking at PassMark results, the Blade 14 scores 29482, while the Blade 16 again outperforms it with a score of 35142. In the single-core PassMark test, the Blade 14 scores 3841, and the Blade 16 is only slightly ahead with 3872, showing a small advantage in single-threaded performance.

Overall, the Razer Blade 16 tends to outperform the Blade 14 in most benchmark results, with higher multi-core and overall performance scores, although the single-core differences are relatively minor.

The Razer Blade 14 (2025) and Razer Blade 16 (2025) both offer solid connectivity options, but with some differences in port configurations. Both models feature two Thunderbolt 4 ports and one HDMI 2.1 output, allowing for high-speed data transfer and high-quality external display support. However, the Blade 14 has two USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB-A ports, while the Blade 16 has three, offering slightly more flexibility for wired peripherals.

Both laptops support Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), ensuring excellent wireless connectivity across various networks. Additionally, both feature Bluetooth 5.4 for wireless accessories, and both include an external memory slot, though neither has RJ45 ports, DisplayPort outputs, mini DisplayPort outputs, or a VGA connector.

One other key difference is that the Blade 14 has an HDMI output, while the Blade 16 shares the same HDMI output but also includes support for AirPlay, which the Blade 14 also offers. Overall, both models provide a comprehensive set of connectivity features with some variation in the number of USB-A ports.

The Razer Blade 14 (2025) and Razer Blade 16 (2025) differ in battery size, with the Blade 14 featuring a 72 Wh battery and the Blade 16 equipped with a larger 90 Wh battery. Both models, however, include sleep-and-charge USB ports, allowing you to charge devices while the laptop is in sleep mode. Neither model comes with a MagSafe power adapter.

Overall, the Blade 16 has a larger battery, which may provide extended usage, but both laptops offer similar charging and power-related features, including the sleep-and-charge functionality.

The Razer Blade 14 (2025) and Razer Blade 16 (2025) both come with stereo speakers and a 3.5 mm audio jack, providing a solid audio experience. Both laptops also support ray tracing and DLSS, ensuring enhanced graphics performance for gaming. Neither model includes Dolby Atmos support, and neither comes with a stylus. Both devices feature two microphones and utilize 3D facial recognition for security, but only the Blade 16 includes a fingerprint scanner, whereas the Blade 14 does not.

Both models have a front camera, and neither offers an S/PDIF Out port, gyroscope, GPS, accelerometer, compass, or an optical disc drive. The Blade 14 and Blade 16 share similar features in most areas, with the main distinction being the presence of the fingerprint scanner on the Blade 16.

The Razer Blade 14 (2025) and Razer Blade 16 (2025) share several core features, but with some differences in GPU and power characteristics. Both laptops feature a clock multiplier of 20 and support Intel Resizable BAR. They also use Blackwell GPU architecture, with integrated graphics. The Blade 14 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 50W, while the Blade 16 has a significantly higher TDP of 95W, indicating a higher power requirement for the Blade 16.

In terms of GPU performance, the Blade 14 is equipped with the Radeon 780M, which has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 48 render output units (ROPs). The Blade 16, on the other hand, features the Radeon 890M with 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, suggesting a higher graphics processing capability. Additionally, the Blade 14 has a 128-bit memory bus width, while the Blade 16 benefits from a wider 256-bit memory bus, offering greater memory bandwidth of 811.5 GB/s, compared to the Blade 14's 405.8 GB/s.

Both models support 3D and multi-display technology, with the same effective memory speed of 25400 MHz, and the same GPU memory speed of 2000 MHz. They also both support ECC memory and have the same RAM speed maximum of 7500 MHz. The Blade 16, however, features more GPU execution units (16 vs 12 in the Blade 14) and slightly more L2 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB in the Blade 14). Both laptops have a maximum CPU temperature of 100 °C and include NX bit security support. The Blade 14 has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Blade 16 does not.