Realme C85 Pro VS Realme P3 Lite 4G

Both the Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G feature waterproof designs, ensuring resistance to water exposure, but their Ingress Protection (IP) ratings differ. The C85 Pro boasts an IP69 rating, indicating higher water and dust protection compared to the P3 Lite 4G's IP68 rating, which still provides robust protection but slightly less than the C85 Pro.

In terms of physical size, the Realme C85 Pro is slightly larger, measuring 164.4 mm in height and 78 mm in width, with a volume of 103.87 cm³. In comparison, the P3 Lite 4G is a bit more compact, standing at 165.8 mm in height and 75.9 mm in width, and with a volume of 98.16 cm³. While the C85 Pro is heavier at 205 g, the P3 Lite 4G weighs 196 g, making it a bit lighter overall.

Both phones have similar thicknesses, with the Realme C85 Pro at 8.1 mm and the P3 Lite 4G at 7.8 mm, showing only a slight difference in their profiles. Neither device has a rugged build, and neither can be folded, highlighting that both phones are intended for conventional use despite their water-resistant features.

The Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G have notable differences in display technology. The C85 Pro features a 6.8-inch LCD with IPS technology, while the P3 Lite 4G uses a 6.67-inch OLED/AMOLED display. The OLED/AMOLED panel of the P3 Lite 4G typically offers more vibrant colors and deeper blacks compared to the C85 Pro's LCD.

In terms of screen resolution, the C85 Pro has a higher 1080 x 2344 px resolution, providing a sharper image compared to the P3 Lite 4G's 720 x 1604 px resolution. This difference is also reflected in the pixel density, with the C85 Pro at 254 ppi and the P3 Lite 4G at 264 ppi. Although the P3 Lite 4G has a slightly higher pixel density, the difference is minimal, and the C85 Pro's higher resolution likely offers a more detailed display overall.

Both phones support a 120Hz refresh rate for smoother visuals, and both have touch screens. However, neither device supports branded damage-resistant glass, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or Always-On Display features, and neither has a secondary screen. These limitations mean that while both displays are high-quality, they lack some of the advanced protective and visual enhancement features found in other devices.

The Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G differ significantly in their performance specs. The C85 Pro is equipped with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, offering higher memory capacity compared to the P3 Lite 4G, which has 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. This gives the C85 Pro an advantage in multitasking and storage space.

In terms of processing power, the Realme C85 Pro features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G chipset with a CPU clocked at 2.8 GHz for the high-performance cores and 1.9 GHz for the power-efficient cores, while the P3 Lite 4G is powered by the Unisoc T7250 chipset, which has lower clock speeds at 1.8 GHz for the two high-performance cores and 1.6 GHz for the six power-efficient cores. The C85 Pro’s higher clock speeds and more advanced 6 nm semiconductor size should theoretically result in faster performance compared to the P3 Lite 4G’s 12 nm semiconductor size.

In terms of GPU performance, the C85 Pro has the Adreno 610 with a clock speed of 1260 MHz, whereas the P3 Lite 4G uses the Mali G57, clocked at 850 MHz. The C85 Pro’s GPU has a significant advantage in terms of clock speed, which should translate into better graphics performance. Both phones have integrated LTE, use big.LITTLE technology for CPU efficiency, and support 64-bit architecture. The C85 Pro also has a higher maximum memory capacity of 16GB, while the P3 Lite 4G can handle a maximum of 12GB. Both devices have similar RAM speeds, with the C85 Pro at 2133 MHz and the P3 Lite 4G at 1866 MHz, further emphasizing the C85 Pro’s stronger overall performance capabilities in various tasks.

The Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G both offer solid camera setups, but with notable differences. The C85 Pro features a 50 MP main camera with a wide aperture of f/1.8, while the P3 Lite 4G has a 32 MP main camera, also with a f/1.8 aperture. Both cameras lack optical image stabilization and offer phase-detection autofocus for photos, as well as continuous autofocus for video recording. The C85 Pro supports video recording at 1080 x 60 fps, which provides smoother video compared to the P3 Lite 4G’s 1080 x 30 fps video recording capability.

For front-facing cameras, the C85 Pro has an 8 MP front camera with a f/2.0 aperture, while the P3 Lite 4G features a 16 MP front camera with a slightly narrower f/2.4 aperture. Both front cameras support HDR, have touch autofocus, and can shoot timelapse videos. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash, though both cameras support panorama shooting in-camera.

In terms of additional features, both devices lack built-in HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, or 3D photo/video capabilities. The C85 Pro does support slow-motion video, manual focus, and raw shooting, whereas the P3 Lite 4G offers similar features but with slightly fewer details on raw shooting. Overall, the two phones have comparable camera functions, with the C85 Pro offering a higher megapixel main camera and more advanced video recording options, while the P3 Lite 4G has a stronger front camera.

The Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G both run Android 15 and share many operating system features. These include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, and a media picker. Both phones also support features like playing games while they download, dark mode, battery health check, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, and customizable notifications.

Both devices also support split screen, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and offline voice recognition with voice commands. They can track the current position of the mobile device, offer a child lock, support widgets, and are multi-user systems. Other features such as Live Text, full-page screenshots, sharing intents, and the ability to offload apps are available on both devices as well.

However, there are a few features missing from both phones. Neither device supports Wi-Fi password sharing, Focus Modes, or Quick Start. Both phones also do not receive direct OS updates. The Android experience across both devices is largely identical in terms of features, with no significant differences between the two in the operating system category.

The Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G are both equipped with large batteries, but with slight differences in capacity. The C85 Pro features a 7000 mAh battery, while the P3 Lite 4G has a slightly smaller 6000 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging at 45W and come with a charger in the box. Neither device supports wireless charging, and both have non-removable, rechargeable batteries. Additionally, both phones feature a battery level indicator for easy monitoring of battery status.

Despite the difference in battery capacity, both phones have similar charging capabilities, and neither offers removable batteries. The C85 Pro’s larger battery might provide slightly longer battery life, but both devices support the same fast charging speed and offer the same core battery features.

The Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G differ in their audio features. The C85 Pro lacks a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the P3 Lite 4G includes one, allowing for wired headphones or other audio accessories. Additionally, the P3 Lite 4G is equipped with stereo speakers, while the C85 Pro does not have stereo speakers, which could affect the overall audio experience when listening to media without headphones.

Neither device supports advanced audio codecs like aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, so both phones may have similar audio quality limitations when using Bluetooth audio devices.

Neither phone has a built-in radio, so users won’t have access to FM or other radio signals on either device. The primary difference in audio features comes down to the presence of the 3.5 mm jack and stereo speakers on the P3 Lite 4G, which are absent on the C85 Pro.

The Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G have similar connectivity and feature sets, with a few key differences. Both phones support 2 SIM cards, have an external memory slot, USB Type-C with USB version 2, and NFC. They also both feature Bluetooth, with the C85 Pro supporting Bluetooth 5 and the P3 Lite 4G offering Bluetooth 5.2, which could provide slightly improved performance in terms of connection stability and range.

In terms of Wi-Fi, the C85 Pro supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), while the P3 Lite 4G offers an additional Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) support, which could result in faster and more efficient Wi-Fi connections on the P3 Lite 4G. Both phones have similar cellular features, including GPS, a compass, and a fingerprint scanner for security. Neither phone supports 5G, has crash detection, or includes an infrared sensor or barometer.

Regarding sensors, the C85 Pro lacks a gyroscope, while the P3 Lite 4G includes one. Both phones have an accelerometer and support Galileo. However, neither device has features like 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, a stylus, motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector. The overall connectivity and feature sets of both phones are quite similar, with the P3 Lite 4G having a slight edge in terms of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth versions.

The Realme C85 Pro and Realme P3 Lite 4G are similar in several miscellaneous features. Both phones include a video light, which can be useful for improving lighting in low-light video recordings. Neither device features sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning both have traditional flat displays without the advanced durability or flexibility that these other display types offer.

There are no differences between the two devices in this category, as both phones share the same set of features. The only notable inclusion on both phones is the video light, while the other features, such as the type of display glass and form, remain standard across both models.