Realme GT 7 VS Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra

The Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra both come with waterproofing, but their water resistance specifications differ slightly. The Realme GT 7 has an IP67 and IP69 rating, meaning it is resistant to dust and can withstand being submerged in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes, along with being able to endure high-pressure water jets. The Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra, on the other hand, has an IP68 rating, meaning it can be submerged in water up to 1.5 meters for up to 30 minutes and offers slightly better protection against water immersion.

In terms of size, the Realme GT 7 is slightly lighter at 206 g, compared to the Poco F7 Ultra’s 212 g. The difference in weight is minimal, though, and may not be very noticeable in everyday use. The thickness of the two devices is also quite similar, with the Realme GT 7 at 8.3 mm and the Poco F7 Ultra at 8.4 mm, which makes them nearly identical in terms of profile.

The dimensions of the two phones show a small difference as well. The Realme GT 7 measures 162.4 mm in height and 76.1 mm in width, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is slightly shorter at 160.3 mm in height and a bit narrower at 75 mm in width. These slight differences may affect the feel of the phone in hand but overall, the devices are quite similar in size. The Realme GT 7 has a volume of 102.576712 cm³, while the Poco F7 Ultra is a little smaller with a volume of 100.989 cm³, making the Realme GT 7 just slightly larger in overall volume.

The display specifications of the Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra share several similarities, but there are also some key differences. Both devices feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Realme GT 7 has a 6.78″ screen, while the Poco F7 Ultra comes with a slightly smaller 6.67″ display. Despite the size difference, both displays have a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth visuals, and both support HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision for enhanced color and contrast.

The pixel density differs between the two, with the Realme GT 7 offering 450 ppi, while the Poco F7 Ultra has a sharper 526 ppi. This higher pixel density in the Poco F7 Ultra may result in crisper details, especially when viewing high-resolution content. The resolution also varies: the Realme GT 7 has a resolution of 1264 x 2780 px, whereas the Poco F7 Ultra has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 px, contributing to the sharper display in the latter.

In terms of brightness, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outshines the Realme GT 7, offering a peak brightness of 1800 nits compared to the GT 7′s 600 nits. This means the Poco F7 Ultra is likely to perform better in direct sunlight. Both devices feature a touch sampling rate, with the Realme GT 7 at 360Hz and the Poco F7 Ultra at 480Hz, indicating the Poco F7 Ultra may provide a more responsive touch experience. Both phones also include branded damage-resistant glass, Always-On Display, and a contrast ratio of 5000000:1, making them comparable in durability and visual quality overall.

When it comes to performance, the Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra both offer impressive specifications, but they differ in certain areas. Both phones feature 512GB of internal storage, but the Realme GT 7 is equipped with 12GB of RAM, while the Poco F7 Ultra has a slightly larger 16GB of RAM. This difference in RAM could affect multitasking and overall performance when handling heavy apps or games.

The chipset and CPU configurations also differ significantly. The Realme GT 7 uses a MediaTek Dimensity 9400e SoC, with a CPU speed configuration of 1 x 3.4 GHz, 3 x 2.85 GHz, and 4 x 2 GHz. In comparison, the Poco F7 Ultra features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC, which has a faster CPU configuration of 2 x 4.32 GHz and 6 x 3.53 GHz. These differences in CPU performance may result in faster processing on the Poco F7 Ultra, particularly for tasks that require more power.

In terms of benchmarking scores, the Realme GT 7 has an AnTuTu score of 2,151,533, whereas the Poco F7 Ultra scores higher with 2,580,490. The Poco F7 Ultra also outperforms the Realme GT 7 in Geekbench 6 multi-core (8887 vs 7547) and single-core (2970 vs 2302) scores. Similarly, the Poco F7 Ultra achieves a higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark score of 6204, compared to the Realme GT 7′s 5393. While both devices feature similar GPU names and DirectX 12 support, the Poco F7 Ultra’s Adreno 830 GPU has a slightly lower clock speed (1100 MHz) compared to the Realme GT 7’s Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 (1300 MHz). The Poco F7 Ultra also boasts a higher RAM speed of 5300 MHz versus the Realme GT 7’s 8533 MHz, which may offer faster memory performance in the GT 7.

The Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra both feature impressive camera setups, with similar key features and a few notable differences. Both phones offer a triple-lens main camera, but the Realme GT 7 has a combination of 50 MP, 50 MP, and 8 MP lenses, while the Poco F7 Ultra opts for 50 MP, 50 MP, and 32 MP. Both devices have a 32 MP front camera, ensuring high-quality selfies.

The aperture of the main camera lenses differs slightly: the Realme GT 7 has a wide aperture of 1.8, 2, and 2.2f, whereas the Poco F7 Ultra has a slightly wider aperture of 1.6, 2, and 2.2f. Both phones support features such as optical image stabilization (OIS), phase-detection autofocus (PDAF), and continuous autofocus during video recording, ensuring smooth performance for both photography and videography. Both also offer 4K video recording at 30 fps, though the Poco F7 Ultra records at a slightly lower 24 fps in the same resolution.

For zoom capabilities, the Realme GT 7 supports 2x optical zoom, while the Poco F7 Ultra has a slightly higher 2.5x optical zoom. The Poco F7 Ultra also includes two flash LEDs compared to the Realme GT 7’s single LED. Both devices support features like slow-motion video recording, HDR mode, timelapse, and manual adjustments for exposure, ISO, and focus. However, the Realme GT 7 supports Dolby Vision recording, which is not available on the Poco F7 Ultra. Both phones also lack a dual-lens front camera, front-facing LED flash, and 360° panorama functionality.

Both the Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra run on Android 15, offering a wide range of common features in the operating system. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization, making them similar in terms of user control and privacy. They also both allow blocking app tracking, have notification permissions, and support media pickers. Notably, both phones support dark mode, dynamic theming, and widgets.

However, there are a few areas where the two devices differ. While both devices can play games while they download, the Realme GT 7 offers an extra dim mode, which the Poco F7 Ultra does not have. Both phones allow offloading apps, customizing notifications, using Live Text, and taking full-page screenshots, and both support split screen and picture-in-picture (PiP) functionality. They also have offline voice recognition, voice commands, and a multi-user system.

One major point of comparison is that neither phone supports direct OS updates, and neither device includes Quick Start. Additionally, both phones have a child lock and the ability to track the current position of a mobile device. They are also both free and open source, offering a degree of flexibility for developers and advanced users. Overall, the operating system features are quite similar, with only small variations in specific functions like the extra dim mode on the Realme GT 7.

The Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra differ in their battery capacities and features. The Realme GT 7 is equipped with a larger 7000 mAh battery, while the Poco F7 Ultra has a smaller 5300 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging at 120W, and both come with a charger in the box. However, the Poco F7 Ultra stands out with wireless charging support, which the Realme GT 7 does not have.

Both phones feature a rechargeable battery, a battery level indicator, and lack a removable battery. The Realme GT 7 does not offer wireless charging, whereas the Poco F7 Ultra’s wireless charging capability provides an additional charging option. Despite the difference in battery power, both phones ensure quick charging speeds with their 120W fast charging support, making them capable of rapidly recharging their batteries.

In summary, while both phones have similar charging speeds and come with a charger, the Realme GT 7 offers a larger battery capacity, whereas the Poco F7 Ultra adds wireless charging to its feature set, offering more versatility in charging options.

Both the Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra offer high-quality audio features, though they have some differences. Neither phone includes a 3.5 mm audio jack, but both are equipped with stereo speakers for a richer sound experience. In terms of Bluetooth audio support, both phones feature aptX, ensuring high-quality audio streaming. However, the Poco F7 Ultra offers more advanced Bluetooth audio technologies compared to the Realme GT 7. The Poco F7 Ultra supports LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless, while the Realme GT 7 lacks support for LDAC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless.

Both devices do not include a radio, so users who enjoy traditional radio functionality are limited in this regard. However, the additional audio technologies on the Poco F7 Ultra, such as aptX HD and aptX Lossless, might provide an enhanced wireless audio experience for users with compatible devices.

In summary, while both phones offer similar stereo speaker setups and aptX support, the Poco F7 Ultra provides more extensive support for advanced audio codecs, making it more versatile for high-quality wireless audio streaming compared to the Realme GT 7.

The Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra both come with extensive connectivity options and similar features. Both devices support 5G, ensuring fast mobile data speeds, and offer Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) for high-speed wireless internet. The Poco F7 Ultra, however, adds Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) to its support, which is a slight advantage in terms of additional wireless band support. Both devices use USB Type-C and support NFC for contactless payments and data transfer, as well as Bluetooth. The Realme GT 7 has Bluetooth version 5.4, while the Poco F7 Ultra has a more recent Bluetooth version 6.

Both phones are equipped with a fingerprint scanner for biometric security and include essential sensors such as a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass. Neither device has a barometer, HDMI output, or supports 3D facial recognition or an iris scanner. Both models offer a cellular module and are compatible with Galileo for GPS positioning. The download speed for both is 10,000 MBits/s, but the Realme GT 7 has a higher upload speed of 7,000 MBits/s, compared to the Poco F7 Ultra's 3,500 MBits/s.

Neither phone offers an external memory slot, emergency SOS via satellite, or crash detection, and both lack support for optical or motion tracking. Additionally, neither device features a built-in projector or is DLNA-certified. Overall, while both phones provide similar connectivity and features, the Poco F7 Ultra has a slight edge in Wi-Fi support (with Wi-Fi 6E) and Bluetooth version (5.6), while the Realme GT 7 offers faster upload speeds.

Both the Realme GT 7 and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra come with a video light, making them suitable for capturing video in low-light environments. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, so users will not find those specific display technologies in either model. These aspects of the design are consistent across both products.

Overall, in the miscellaneous features category, the Realme GT 7 and Poco F7 Ultra are identical, offering a video light but lacking any of the more advanced display types like sapphire glass or curved displays.

Thus, there are no significant differences in this category between the two devices, and both are equipped with similar basic video lighting functionality while missing certain advanced display features.