Realme GT 7T VS Xiaomi Poco F7

Both the Realme GT 7T and Xiaomi Poco F7 are waterproof, with each boasting an IP rating that ensures protection against water and dust. The Realme GT 7T has an IP67 and IP69 rating, while the Poco F7 has a slightly higher IP68 rating, offering protection at deeper depths and for longer durations.

In terms of physical dimensions, the Realme GT 7T is slightly lighter, weighing 202 g compared to the Poco F7's 215.7 g. The Realme model also has a thickness of 8.3 mm, while the Poco F7 is marginally slimmer at 8.2 mm. As for their width, the Realme GT 7T is 76 mm wide, while the Poco F7 is slightly wider at 77.9 mm. The height of both devices is close, with the Realme at 162.4 mm and the Poco F7 at 163.1 mm.

When it comes to volume, the Poco F7 is slightly larger, with a volume of 104.185 cm³, while the Realme GT 7T has a volume of 102.442 cm³. Neither phone has a rugged build or the ability to fold, making them both standard smartphones in terms of durability features.

Both the Realme GT 7T and Xiaomi Poco F7 feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The screen size of the Realme GT 7T is 6.8″, while the Poco F7's display is slightly larger at 6.83″. In terms of pixel density, the Realme GT 7T offers a sharper display with 453 ppi, compared to the Poco F7's 447 ppi.

The resolution of both displays is quite similar, with the Realme GT 7T offering 1280 x 2800 px and the Poco F7 at 1280 x 2772 px. Both phones support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and gaming experiences. The Realme GT 7T has a higher typical brightness of 1000 nits, while the Poco F7 has a lower typical brightness of 700 nits.

Both phones come with branded damage-resistant glass and support HDR10, HDR10+, Always-On Display, and Dolby Vision, providing an enhanced viewing experience. Neither device has a secondary screen, and both include a touch screen for interaction.

Both the Realme GT 7T and Xiaomi Poco F7 come equipped with 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, offering ample space and memory for multitasking and storing files. In terms of chipset, the Realme GT 7T uses the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Max, while the Poco F7 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. The Realme's chipset is paired with a Mali G720 MC7 GPU, while the Poco F7 uses an Adreno 825 GPU.

When comparing CPU speeds, the Realme GT 7T has a configuration of 1 core at 3.25 GHz, 3 cores at 2.1 GHz, and 4 cores at 3 GHz, while the Poco F7's CPU consists of 3 cores at 3.01 GHz, 2 cores at 2.8 GHz, 2 cores at 2.02 GHz, and 1 core at 3.21 GHz. The Realme's GPU clock speed is 1300 MHz, while the Poco F7's GPU runs at 1150 MHz. The Realme GT 7T has RAM running at 4267 MHz, while the Poco F7’s RAM runs at 4800 MHz.

Both phones share a 4 nm semiconductor size and support 64-bit processing, with DirectX 12, integrated graphics, OpenGL ES 3.2, and big.LITTLE technology. Both phones also have 8 CPU threads and include TrustZone. As for memory bandwidth, the Poco F7 offers a higher maximum bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, compared to the Realme GT 7T's 68.2 GB/s. The Realme GT 7T has 1 MB of L2 cache and 6 MB of L3 cache, while the Poco F7 has a larger 6 MB of L2 cache and 8 MB of L3 cache. Both devices can handle up to 24GB of maximum memory and are equipped with DDR5 memory.

Both the Realme GT 7T and Xiaomi Poco F7 feature dual-lens main cameras with 50 MP and 8 MP sensors. The Realme GT 7T's main camera has a wide aperture of f/2.2 and f/1.8, while the Poco F7's main camera uses f/2.2 and f/1.5 for its lenses. The front camera on the Realme GT 7T is a 32 MP sensor, while the Poco F7 has a 20 MP front camera. The Realme GT 7T also has a wider aperture of f/2.5 for its front camera, compared to the Poco F7's f/2.2 aperture.

Both phones support 2160p video recording at 60 fps, and both have built-in optical image stabilization, continuous autofocus for video, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. Additionally, both devices support slow-motion video, HDR mode, manual exposure, manual ISO, serial shot mode, manual focus, touch autofocus, and a timelapse function. Neither phone includes a front-facing LED flash or a dual-lens front camera, and both lack support for HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording.

There are some notable differences in the flash systems; the Realme GT 7T has a single flash LED, while the Poco F7 uses two LEDs. Neither phone has a BSI sensor, but both use CMOS sensors. Additionally, both phones lack laser autofocus, 360° panorama shooting, and 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Both the Realme GT 7T and Xiaomi Poco F7 run Android 15 and share several common features, such as clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. Both phones also offer the ability to block app tracking, have on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, and the option to play games while they download. Additionally, they both support dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health check, an extra dim mode, dynamic theming, and offloading apps.

There are also some specific features common to both devices, such as customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen support, PiP, sharing intents, a child lock, widgets, offline voice recognition, and voice commands. Both phones also track the current position of a mobile device, support a multi-user system, and are free and open source.

However, the Poco F7 has one additional feature that the Realme GT 7T lacks: Wi-Fi password sharing. Additionally, both devices do not support Quick Start or get direct OS updates. There are no major differences in the operating system experience between the two phones, as they share almost identical capabilities.

The Realme GT 7T comes with a larger 7000 mAh battery compared to the Poco F7's 6500 mAh battery. Both devices do not support wireless charging, but both support fast charging. The Realme GT 7T offers a faster charging speed of 120W, while the Poco F7 supports a slower 90W charging speed.

Additionally, the Realme GT 7T comes with a charger in the box, whereas the Poco F7 does not. Both phones have a rechargeable battery, a battery level indicator, and do not feature a removable battery.

Both the Realme GT 7T and Xiaomi Poco F7 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio options. Both phones are equipped with stereo speakers for enhanced sound quality. However, the Realme GT 7T does not support any of the advanced Bluetooth audio codecs like aptX, LDAC, or their variations, whereas the Poco F7 supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, but not aptX Lossless.

Neither device includes a radio, so users will not be able to listen to traditional FM or AM stations through these phones.

Both the Realme GT 7T and Xiaomi Poco F7 offer 5G support, dual SIM card slots, USB Type-C, and NFC for convenient connectivity. They also both feature Bluetooth version 6 and have a fingerprint scanner for security. Additionally, both phones support GPS and Galileo for location tracking, and include a gyroscope, accelerometer, and infrared sensor. Neither device supports external memory, has a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner.

The Realme GT 7T supports Wi-Fi versions 4, 5, and 6, while the Poco F7 supports the same versions with the addition of Wi-Fi 7. The Realme phone also offers a faster download speed of 5170 Mbit/s, compared to the Poco F7’s 4200 Mbit/s. Both devices include a compass and a cellular module, but neither has motion tracking, optical tracking, a built-in projector, or a heart rate monitor.

Both devices lack emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, and the ability to offload apps, but they do support sharing via NFC, use on-device machine learning, and allow customization of notifications. The Poco F7 includes a higher Wi-Fi version (Wi-Fi 7) and a slower download speed when compared to the Realme GT 7T's stronger download performance.

Both the Realme GT 7T and Xiaomi Poco F7 come with a video light to enhance video recording in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, as these options are not available on either phone.

In summary, the two phones share identical features in this group, with both offering a video light and lacking the mentioned advanced display technologies.