Realme P3 VS Vivo T4x 5G

The most meaningful difference in this group is water protection. The Realme P3 carries an IP68 rating, meaning it is fully waterproof and can withstand submersion in water — a level of protection typically associated with premium devices. The Vivo T4x 5G, by contrast, holds an IP64 rating, which guards only against water splashes and dust, but offers no protection against immersion. In practical terms, this means the Realme P3 can survive an accidental drop in a sink or pool, while the Vivo T4x 5G cannot. For users who frequently use their phone outdoors, near water, or in unpredictable environments, this is a significant real-world advantage for the P3.

On physical dimensions, the differences are modest but consistent: the Realme P3 is lighter at 194 g versus 204 g, marginally thinner at 8 mm versus 8.1 mm, and slightly shorter and narrower overall. The resulting volume difference — roughly 98.8 cm³ vs 102.4 cm³ — confirms the P3 has a somewhat more compact footprint. While a 10 g weight difference is subtle, it does contribute to a more comfortable one-handed grip over extended use.

Both phones share a non-rugged, non-foldable form factor, so neither targets extreme-durability use cases. Overall, the Realme P3 holds a clear design advantage in this group, driven primarily by its superior IP68 waterproofing and its slightly lighter, more compact build.

The single most important differentiator in this group is display technology. The Realme P3 uses an OLED/AMOLED panel, while the Vivo T4x 5G relies on an LCD IPS screen. In practical terms, OLED delivers true blacks by switching off individual pixels, producing noticeably higher contrast and more vibrant colors — particularly visible when watching dark scenes in videos or using dark mode. LCD panels, regardless of quality, cannot match this because they use a backlight that remains on across the entire screen. For media consumption and everyday visual experience, this is a meaningful gap.

Beyond panel technology, the two displays are remarkably close on paper. Screen sizes are virtually identical at 6.67″ and 6.72″, pixel density is essentially the same at around 395 ppi vs 393 ppi, resolutions are nearly equivalent at 1080 x 2400 and 1080 x 2408, and both run at a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. Neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, so neither has an edge in high dynamic range content.

With everything else essentially tied, the Realme P3 holds a clear display advantage purely on the strength of its OLED panel. For users who prioritize screen quality for streaming, gaming, or general daily use, the contrast and color benefits of OLED over LCD are real and consistently noticeable.

At a headline level, these two devices are remarkably close in performance. The AnTuTu scores are essentially identical — 684,046 for the Realme P3 versus 685,000 for the Vivo T4x 5G — a gap so small it is indistinguishable in real-world use. Both are built on a 4 nm process node, share the same DDR5 memory standard, and top out at 16 GB of maximum RAM, so the generational foundation is on equal footing.

Dig deeper, however, and a split picture emerges. The Realme P3's Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 with its Adreno 810 GPU pulls ahead in CPU-focused tasks, posting higher Geekbench 6 scores in both single-core (1,104 vs 1,031) and multi-core (3,105 vs 2,827) tests — an advantage that translates to snappier app launches and smoother sustained workloads. The Vivo T4x's Dimensity 7300, meanwhile, counters with a notably higher GPU clock speed (1,047 MHz vs 800 MHz) and a significantly faster RAM bus at 6,400 MHz versus 2,750 MHz, which can benefit memory-intensive operations and data throughput.

Taken together, this is one of the closest performance matchups these specs can produce. That said, the Realme P3's measurable CPU benchmark lead is consistent across both single and multi-core workloads, and for the tasks most users care about daily — app responsiveness, multitasking, gaming — CPU throughput tends to be the dominant factor. The Realme P3 earns a narrow edge here, though users who prioritize GPU-heavy workloads may find the T4x's higher GPU clock worth noting.

Both phones share a 50 MP + 2 MP dual rear camera setup and identical 4K at 30fps video capability, but the real-world shooting experience diverges in two important ways. First, the Realme P3's main lens opens to f/1.8, whereas the Vivo T4x 5G's primary rear lens sits at a narrower f/2.4 — a meaningful difference in low-light scenarios, where a wider aperture captures significantly more light and tends to produce cleaner, brighter shots. Second, the Realme P3 includes optical image stabilization (OIS), which the T4x lacks entirely. OIS reduces blur from hand movement during handheld video recording and in dim conditions, making it one of the most practically impactful camera hardware features in this class.

The front camera gap is equally notable. The Realme P3 sports a 16 MP selfie shooter versus just 8 MP on the T4x — double the resolution, which preserves more detail when cropping or shooting in good light. The T4x does respond with a slightly wider front aperture of f/2.1 compared to f/2.4 on the P3, giving it a modest low-light edge for selfies, but this is a narrow advantage against the resolution deficit.

Beyond these differences, the feature set is largely identical — both offer phase-detection autofocus, continuous AF during recording, slow-motion, HDR mode, panorama, and a full suite of manual controls. The Realme P3 holds a clear camera advantage in this group, with its wider main aperture, OIS support, and significantly higher-resolution front camera collectively representing a stronger overall imaging package.

This is a rare case of a complete specification tie. Both the Realme P3 and the Vivo T4x 5G run Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every tracked OS attribute — from privacy controls like location and camera/microphone permissions, to usability features like dark mode, dynamic theming, split-screen multitasking, and Picture-in-Picture. Neither device receives direct OS updates, and neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing or focus modes.

The shared feature list does cover genuinely useful capabilities worth noting: both include on-device machine learning, offline voice recognition, Live Text, battery health monitoring, and an extra dim mode — a solid modern Android foundation that serves everyday users well. The privacy toolkit is also equally matched, with app tracking controls and clipboard warnings present on both sides.

Since not a single spec differs between these two devices in this group, the verdict is an absolute tie. Any difference in the actual software experience between them would come down to each brand's custom Android skin — but that falls outside the scope of the provided data.

Battery capacity is where the Vivo T4x 5G picks up its clearest win in this comparison. Its 6,500 mAh cell versus the Realme P3's 6,000 mAh represents a 500 mAh — roughly 8% — advantage in raw energy storage. Both are large batteries by any standard, well above the mainstream 5,000 mAh norm, but that extra capacity on the T4x translates directly to more screen-on time between charges, which is a tangible benefit for heavy users or those in situations where charging access is limited.

Charging speeds are essentially identical — 45W on the P3 versus 44W on the T4x — a difference so marginal it would be imperceptible in daily use. Both support fast charging and neither offers wireless charging, so the wired charging experience is effectively the same on both devices.

With everything else matched, the Vivo T4x 5G holds a modest but genuine battery advantage in this group solely on the strength of its larger capacity. For longevity-focused users, it is the more endurance-oriented choice.

Audio is another category where the Realme P3 and Vivo T4x 5G are in complete lockstep. Both feature stereo speakers — a welcome inclusion at this price tier that makes a real difference for media consumption, gaming, and hands-free calls compared to a single mono driver. Neither device includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack, so wired audio requires an adapter or a USB-C solution on both phones.

For wireless audio quality, neither device supports any high-resolution Bluetooth codec — no aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, or aptX Lossless. This means both are limited to standard Bluetooth audio codecs when paired with wireless headphones, which is a shared limitation rather than a differentiator. Neither includes an FM radio either.

With every tracked spec identical across both devices, this group is an unambiguous tie. Users who prioritize advanced wireless audio fidelity will find the same constraints on both phones, and those who value stereo speaker output will find the same capability on either.

Three differences stand out in this group, and they cut in different directions. The Realme P3 includes NFC, which the Vivo T4x 5G entirely lacks — a meaningful practical distinction for users who rely on contactless payments or tap-to-pair functionality. On the other side, the T4x carries Bluetooth 5.4 versus the P3's 5.2, a newer version that brings modest improvements in connection stability and efficiency, though the gap is unlikely to be noticeable in typical daily use. More strikingly, the T4x's upload speed reaches 3,270 Mbits/s — roughly double the P3's 1,600 Mbits/s — which benefits users who frequently push large files to the cloud or stream content from their device.

Where the specs converge, both phones are well-equipped: 5G support, dual SIM, USB-C, Wi-Fi 6, GPS with Galileo, an infrared sensor, fingerprint scanner, gyroscope, accelerometer, and compass are all present on both. Neither supports external memory expansion, which is a shared constraint worth noting for storage-conscious users.

Weighing the tradeoffs, the Realme P3 holds a slight overall edge in this group. NFC is a feature with immediate, everyday utility for a large share of users — contactless payments alone make its absence on the T4x a tangible miss. The T4x's faster upload speeds are a genuine advantage, but they apply to a narrower set of use cases. For most people, the P3's NFC support will matter more day-to-day.

The miscellaneous spec group offers very little to differentiate these two devices. Both the Realme P3 and the Vivo T4x 5G share an identical profile across every tracked attribute here: each has a video light, and neither features a sapphire glass display, a curved screen, or an e-paper panel.

This group is a straightforward tie — there is no separating the two phones on any of the provided data points. Neither gains an advantage nor carries a drawback relative to the other within this category.