Realme P4 5G VS Vivo T4x 5G

Both phones share a broadly similar physical footprint, but the Realme P4 5G is the more compact and lighter of the two. At 185 g and 7.6 mm thick, it is noticeably slimmer and 19 grams lighter than the Vivo T4x 5G, which comes in at 204 g and 8.1 mm. In day-to-day use, that gap is tangible — a lighter, thinner phone is easier to pocket, more comfortable during extended one-handed use, and feels less fatiguing over a long day.

Where the difference becomes more meaningful is water resistance. Both carry an IP rating, but the Realme P4 5G holds an IP66 certification, while the Vivo T4x 5G is rated at IP64. The final digit is what matters here: a ″6″ means protection against powerful water jets from any direction, while a ″4″ only guarantees protection against splashing water. In practical terms, the P4 5G can handle a direct stream of water — think rain or a tap — with more confidence, whereas the T4x 5G is better suited to incidental splashes only.

Neither device has a rugged build or a foldable form factor, so those are non-factors. Overall, the Realme P4 5G holds a clear design advantage in this group: it is lighter, thinner, and offers superior water resistance — three attributes that directly affect everyday handling and durability.

The single most important differentiator here is panel technology. The Realme P4 5G uses an OLED/AMOLED display, while the Vivo T4x 5G relies on an LCD IPS panel. This gap is fundamental: OLED delivers true blacks by turning off individual pixels, producing significantly higher contrast, punchier colors, and better power efficiency when dark themes are in use. An IPS LCD, while capable of accurate colors and good brightness, simply cannot match OLED in these respects — particularly in low-light or dark-content scenarios.

The refresh rate gap adds to the P4 5G's display advantage. Its 144Hz panel means scrolling, animations, and gaming all appear noticeably smoother compared to the T4x 5G's 120Hz screen. The difference between 120Hz and 144Hz is subtler than, say, 60Hz vs 120Hz, but it is perceptible in fast-paced content. Meanwhile, screen size and pixel density are effectively matched — both hover around 6.7 inches and just under 400 ppi — so sharpness and real estate are a wash.

One further distinction worth noting is Always-On Display: the P4 5G supports it, the T4x 5G does not. This is a practical convenience feature enabled by OLED's per-pixel power control, letting users glance at the time or notifications without fully waking the screen. Taken together, the Realme P4 5G holds a decisive advantage in this category — superior panel technology, a higher refresh rate, and Always-On Display support make it the stronger display choice by a clear margin.

These two phones are built on remarkably similar silicon. Both use a 4nm MediaTek Dimensity chipset, share the same Mali G615 MC2 GPU at identical clock speeds, carry 8GB of DDR5 RAM at the same 6400 MHz speed, and offer the same 256GB of storage with a 16GB maximum memory ceiling. For most everyday tasks — app switching, social media, streaming, casual gaming — the experience will be virtually indistinguishable.

The only meaningful CPU difference lies in the generation of the chip and the peak clock speed of the performance cores. The Realme P4 5G runs on the Dimensity 7400 with its big cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the Vivo T4x 5G's Dimensity 7300 at 2.5 GHz. The 7400 is the newer, slightly refined iteration of the 7300, and that 100 MHz advantage in peak clock speed can translate to a modest but real edge in CPU-bound workloads — think faster app launches, snappier rendering, and slightly better sustained performance under load.

In practice, the gap is narrow enough that most users will not feel it in routine use. However, strictly on the specs provided, the Realme P4 5G holds a slim but genuine advantage in this category: a newer chipset generation and higher peak CPU frequency give it the edge, even if the real-world delta is small.

On the rear, the two phones are closely matched — both feature a 50MP + 2MP dual-camera setup with identical 4K/30fps video capability and the same autofocus and manual control feature set. The one hardware difference that matters is aperture: the Realme P4 5G's primary lens opens to f/2.2, versus f/2.4 on the Vivo T4x 5G. A wider aperture admits more light, which translates directly to better low-light performance and slightly shallower depth of field — a tangible advantage in dim environments or for portrait-style shots.

The front camera tells a more nuanced story. The P4 5G packs a 16MP selfie sensor compared to the T4x 5G's 8MP, giving it a clear resolution edge — more detail, more flexibility to crop, and generally sharper selfies in good light. However, the T4x 5G counters with a wider front aperture of f/2.1 against the P4 5G's f/2.4, meaning it can pull in more light per frame. For selfie users who shoot frequently in low-light settings, that aperture advantage partially offsets the megapixel gap.

Weighing both cameras together, the Realme P4 5G has the stronger overall camera package. Its wider main lens aperture and significantly higher-resolution front camera represent concrete, spec-supported advantages. The T4x 5G's brighter front aperture is a real point in its favor for nighttime selfies, but it is not enough to close the gap across the full camera system.

Across every single data point in this category, the Realme P4 5G and Vivo T4x 5G are identical. Both ship with Android 15 and carry the same feature set — from privacy controls like location and camera/microphone permissions, to productivity tools like split-screen, Picture-in-Picture, and full-page screenshots, to customization options like dynamic theming and dark mode.

Notably, both phones share the same limitations too: neither gets direct OS updates, neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing, and neither offers focus modes. These absences apply equally, so they do not factor into any differentiation between the two devices.

This is a clear and complete tie. Based strictly on the provided specs, there is no distinguishing factor whatsoever in the operating system category — a user choosing between these two phones should look entirely to other spec groups to make their decision here.

Battery is one of the more clear-cut categories in this comparison. The Realme P4 5G houses a 7000 mAh cell, while the Vivo T4x 5G comes with a 6500 mAh battery. That 500 mAh gap is meaningful — larger capacity directly correlates with more screen-on time before needing a charge, and at this size range both phones are firmly in multi-day territory for moderate users. The P4 5G simply has more reserve to draw from.

The charging speed gap is even more pronounced. The P4 5G supports 80W fast charging versus the T4x 5G's 44W. In practical terms, 80W can replenish a large battery in roughly an hour or less, while 44W will take considerably longer to do the same job. For users who do need to top up quickly — during a commute or a short break — that nearly double charging rate is a genuine convenience advantage. Both phones include a charger in the box, so neither requires an extra purchase to unlock fast charging.

Neither device offers wireless charging or a removable battery, so those are non-factors. The verdict here is straightforward: the Realme P4 5G wins this category decisively — it carries a larger battery and charges it significantly faster, a combination that advantages both endurance-focused and fast-turnaround users alike.

The audio specs for these two phones are a mirror image of each other. Both the Realme P4 5G and the Vivo T4x 5G feature stereo speakers, drop the 3.5mm headphone jack, and offer no high-resolution Bluetooth audio codecs — no aptX, no LDAC, no aptX HD or any of its variants.

The absence of a headphone jack means wired listening requires a USB-C adapter on both devices, which is a shared inconvenience rather than a differentiator. More notably, the lack of any hi-res wireless audio codec means audiophiles using compatible Bluetooth headphones will be limited to standard SBC or AAC transmission quality on either phone — lossless or near-lossless wireless audio is off the table for both.

This is an unambiguous tie. Every audio specification provided is identical across the two products, and there is no basis in the data to favor one over the other in this category.

Three meaningful differences separate these otherwise closely matched phones in this category. The most impactful is Wi-Fi 6: the Vivo T4x 5G supports it alongside Wi-Fi 4 and 5, while the Realme P4 5G tops out at Wi-Fi 5. Wi-Fi 6 delivers higher throughput, better performance in congested network environments, and improved power efficiency — a genuine advantage for users on modern routers or in busy households with many connected devices.

The trade-off cuts the other way on two other fronts. The P4 5G includes NFC, which the T4x 5G lacks entirely. NFC is the backbone of contactless payments, quick Bluetooth pairing, and transit card functionality — for many users, its absence on the T4x 5G is a significant daily inconvenience. The T4x 5G counters with an infrared sensor, which allows the phone to function as a universal remote for TVs and home appliances — a niche but genuinely useful feature for some. The P4 5G has no IR blaster.

Weighing these trade-offs, the advantage depends on use case — but for the broadest audience, NFC is more universally relied upon than an IR sensor. That tips the overall edge to the Realme P4 5G in this category, though users who prioritize Wi-Fi 6 connectivity or want remote control functionality will find the T4x 5G makes a compelling counter-argument on those specific points.

The miscellaneous specs for the Realme P4 5G and Vivo T4x 5G are completely identical. Both have a video light, and neither features a sapphire glass display, a curved display, or an e-paper display. With no differentiating data points anywhere in this group, there is simply nothing to separate the two devices here.

This is a complete tie, and users should place no weight on this category when choosing between the two phones.