Roborock Qrevo C VS Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H40

Both the Roborock Qrevo C and the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H40 come equipped with a HEPA filter and an allergy filter, providing similar filtration capabilities. The Qrevo C operates at a slightly quieter level, with an audible noise of 45 dB, compared to the H40's 50 dB.

In terms of size and weight, the Roborock Qrevo C weighs 3900 g and has dimensions of 353 mm in width, 96.5 mm in height, and 350 mm in thickness, resulting in a total volume of 11922.575 cm³. The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H40 is slightly lighter at 3640 g and is more compact, measuring 340 mm in width, 97 mm in height, and 340 mm in thickness, with a total volume of 11213.2 cm³.

The Qrevo C offers a 1-year warranty period, while the H40 provides a longer warranty of 2 years. Additionally, the Roborock model can go for 49 days before needing to be emptied, while the Xiaomi H40 lasts significantly longer at 90 days. Both models are compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa. The Qrevo C has a larger docking station, measuring 85936.02 cm³, compared to the H40's smaller docking station size of 17734.4 cm³.

The Roborock Qrevo C and Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H40 share many common features, including mapping capabilities, support for no-go zones, obstacle sensors, problem area cleaning, self-emptying, carpet detection, and the ability to schedule cleaning. Both models support virtual barriers, auto docking, and have anti-fall sensors. They also both work with Wi-Fi (Wi-Fi 4, 802.11n) and feature water level adjustment for cleaning.

However, there are some key differences between the two. The Qrevo C includes voice prompts, while the H40 does not. The Qrevo C also offers more advanced mop features, including mop raising, mop drying, and mop cleaning functionality, all of which are not available on the H40. In contrast, the H40 comes with a remote control, whereas the Qrevo C does not.

Both models support remote smartphone control, but the Qrevo C does not get a remote control. Overall, the Roborock Qrevo C provides more extensive cleaning features, particularly with its mop-related functions, while the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H40 offers more user control with its included remote.

The Roborock Qrevo C and Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H40 have similar design features, with both having a dustbin capacity that is relatively small but comparable—0.27 l for the Qrevo C and 0.35 l for the H40. Both models also use bags for dust collection, and each has included washable filters for easy maintenance. Additionally, both automatically adjust their height and indicate when the dustbin is full.

A notable difference between the two is that the Qrevo C includes a display, while the H40 does not. Neither model features twin side brushes, so they share a similar design in that regard. The Qrevo C also stands out by having a display, which can offer more convenience when managing settings or monitoring the robot's performance.

Both robots share practical design elements like height adjustment and full dustbin indication, but the addition of a display on the Qrevo C gives it a slight design edge for users looking for more interactive control, while the H40 lacks this feature.

In terms of cleaning power, the Roborock Qrevo C offers a higher suction power of 12000 Pa, compared to the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H40's 10000 Pa. Both models are capable of cleaning all floor types and are equipped with mopping functionality. However, the Qrevo C has the added advantage of a dirt sensor, which can help it more effectively detect and clean areas with more dirt, while the H40 does not feature this sensor.

Both robots are similarly capable in terms of handling various floor types and mopping tasks, but the Qrevo C’s higher suction power and dirt sensor may give it an edge in thoroughness for dirtier areas or more varied surfaces.

The Roborock Qrevo C and Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H40 both offer a runtime of 180 minutes, but the Qrevo C has a higher battery power of 6400 mAh, compared to the H40's 5200 mAh. This means that while both models can run for the same amount of time, the Qrevo C uses a larger battery for that duration.

In terms of charging, the Qrevo C takes 2.5 hours to recharge, while the H40 requires a longer 4-hour charge time. Additionally, the Qrevo C has a lower operating power consumption of 60W, compared to the H40's 70W. Both models feature a non-removable battery.

While the runtime is identical for both products, the Qrevo C's faster charge time and lower power consumption may offer a more efficient experience overall.