Samsung Galaxy A17 4G VS Samsung Galaxy F17

The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 share many similarities in their design. Both phones are water resistant, featuring an IP54 Ingress Protection rating, which means they can withstand some splashes and dust exposure.

In terms of physical dimensions, both devices are identical, with the same weight of 190 g for the A17 4G and 192 g for the F17. Their thickness, width, height, and volume also match perfectly: 7.5 mm in thickness, 77.9 mm in width, 164.4 mm in height, and a volume of 96.0507 cm³.

Neither phone has a rugged build, and both are not foldable, maintaining a standard smartphone form factor. Despite slight differences in weight, the overall design of these two devices is essentially the same.

The display specifications for the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 are identical. Both phones feature an OLED/AMOLED display type, a 6.7″ screen size, and a pixel density of 385 ppi, providing a sharp and vibrant viewing experience. Their resolution is also the same at 1080 x 2340 px, ensuring clear and detailed images.

Both devices offer a 90Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and a typical brightness of 800 nits, making them well-suited for use in bright conditions. The displays are protected by Gorilla Glass Victus, a branded damage-resistant glass, ensuring durability against scratches and drops.

Neither phone supports HDR10 or HDR10+, nor Dolby Vision, but both feature an Always-On Display and a touch screen. There is no secondary screen on either device, and the display specifications overall are perfectly matched.

The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 have notable differences in performance specifications. The A17 4G comes with 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, while the F17 offers only 128GB of storage and 6GB of RAM. This gives the A17 4G a clear advantage in terms of storage and memory capacity.

In terms of the chipset, the A17 4G is powered by the Mediatek Helio G99, while the F17 uses the Samsung Exynos 1330. The A17 4G has a slightly lower CPU speed at 2 x 2.2 GHz & 6 x 2 GHz compared to the F17's 2 x 2.4 GHz & 6 x 2 GHz. Both devices use big.LITTLE technology and have 8 CPU threads, but the A17 4G's chipset is built on a 6nm process, while the F17's Exynos chipset is built on a 5nm process.

The GPUs also differ, with the A17 4G featuring a Mali G57 GPU running at 950 MHz, while the F17 has a Mali G68 MP2 GPU clocked at 800 MHz. The A17 4G offers a higher GPU turbo speed of 2133 MHz compared to the F17's 950 MHz. Additionally, the A17 4G has faster RAM speed at 4266 MHz, while the F17 operates at 3200 MHz. Both devices support 64-bit processing, but the A17 4G supports a higher maximum memory amount of 12GB, while the F17 is limited to 8GB. The A17 4G's maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s, whereas the F17's is much higher at 51.2 GB/s. Both devices have integrated LTE, support OpenGL ES version 3.2, and have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 5W, as well as integrated graphics. The A17 4G uses DDR memory version 4, while the F17 uses the newer DDR memory version 5.

The camera setups on the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 are very similar, with both featuring a triple-lens main camera setup and a 13MP front camera. The main cameras on both phones include 50MP, 5MP, and 2MP lenses, with identical wide apertures of f/1.8, f/2.2, and f/2.4 for each lens. Both devices offer the same video recording resolution of 1080p at 30fps.

Both phones include a CMOS sensor for their main cameras, but neither has a BSI sensor. They also share features like built-in optical image stabilization, continuous autofocus during video recording, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and support for slow-motion video recording. Both phones have a flash with a single LED, but neither supports dual-tone LED flashes or front-facing LED flashes.

The front camera on both phones has a wide aperture of f/2 and supports similar features, including manual exposure, touch autofocus, timelapse, and panorama creation. Neither phone supports HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, or 3D photo/video recording capabilities. Both phones also lack a secondary front camera and have no front-facing camera under the display. Overall, the camera features are effectively the same for both devices.

Both the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 run on Android 15, offering a range of similar features designed to enhance user experience and privacy. They both include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. Both devices also support theme customization, dark mode, dynamic theming, and have on-device machine learning.

In terms of additional features, both phones support notifications permissions, media picker, customizable notifications, and full-page screenshots. They also allow users to play games while downloading and have an extra dim mode. Both phones include PiP (Picture-in-Picture), offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the ability to track the device’s position. Other shared features include the ability to offload apps, share intents, use widgets, and have a multi-user system.

However, there are a few differences. Neither device has Quick Start, Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, or a child lock. Also, neither device supports direct OS updates. Overall, the operating system features for both the A17 4G and F17 are closely aligned, with very few differences between them.

The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 share identical battery specifications. Both devices come with a 5000 mAh battery, offering ample power for daily use. They both support fast charging at 25W but do not have wireless charging or reverse wireless charging capabilities. Additionally, neither device features a removable battery.

Both phones include a battery level indicator, ensuring users can easily check the battery status. They also have rechargeable batteries, ensuring long-term usability and convenience. There are no significant differences in the battery features between the A17 4G and the F17.

The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 have several similarities and differences when it comes to audio features. Neither device has a 3.5 mm audio jack or stereo speakers, meaning both rely on wireless audio solutions or USB-C for audio output. Additionally, neither device supports advanced audio technologies such as aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless.

The key difference lies in the radio feature: the A17 4G includes a radio, allowing users to listen to FM radio without needing an internet connection, while the F17 does not have this feature.

Overall, the audio capabilities of both phones are quite limited, with the main distinction being the A17 4G's inclusion of a radio.

The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 differ notably in their connectivity and features. The A17 4G lacks 5G support, while the F17 supports 5G, offering faster download speeds of 2550 MBits/s compared to the A17 4G's 650 MBits/s. Additionally, the F17 has a significantly higher upload speed of 1280 MBits/s, whereas the A17 4G offers 150 MBits/s.

Both devices support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), include dual SIM card slots, and have Bluetooth 5.3. They also share features like USB Type-C (USB 2.0), NFC, fingerprint scanners, and GPS with compass. Neither device offers an infrared sensor, HDMI output, or supports 3D facial recognition or an iris scanner. Both phones lack a built-in projector and motion or optical tracking.

The A17 4G has some unique features, such as support for ANT+ and Galileo, a gyroscope, and an accelerometer, while the F17 has no value provided for ANT+. Both phones also have an external memory slot, cellular module, and a barometer is not included in either. There are no significant differences in the overall set of sensors and connectivity features besides the 5G support and performance differences in download/upload speeds.

The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Samsung Galaxy F17 are quite similar in terms of miscellaneous features. Both devices include a video light, allowing for better illumination when recording videos in low light conditions. Neither phone features sapphire glass for the display, a curved display, or an e-paper display.

Thus, the only common feature in this category is the inclusion of the video light, with no significant differences between the two devices.