Samsung Galaxy A17 5G VS Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G

The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G has a water-resistant design with an IP54 rating, while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G lacks any specified water resistance and features an IP68 rating, which is typically a higher level of protection. The A17 weighs 192 g, which is slightly heavier than the Note 15's 178 g. The A17 is also a bit wider at 77.9 mm compared to the Note 15's 75.4 mm, but the Note 15 is marginally thinner at 7.4 mm, compared to the A17's 7.5 mm. In terms of height, the A17 is slightly taller at 164.4 mm, while the Note 15 stands at 165 mm, making their sizes quite similar.

Looking at their volumes, the A17 has a larger volume at 96.05 cm³ compared to the Note 15's 92.06 cm³. Both devices do not have a rugged build and cannot be folded, which means they share this design feature. The A17's water resistance rating (IP54) indicates moderate protection against dust and water splashes, while the Note 15's IP68 rating suggests it can withstand submersion in water for a longer duration.

Overall, the A17 offers water resistance, whereas the Note 15 provides more robust protection with its higher IP rating but lacks specific water resistance features. The design dimensions of both are quite close, with the Note 15 being a bit lighter and thinner.

Both the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The A17 has a 6.7″ screen size, while the Note 15's display is slightly larger at 6.77″. In terms of pixel density, the A17 offers 385 ppi, slightly lower than the Note 15's 388 ppi, but the difference is minimal and should not be noticeably significant. The A17's resolution is 1080 x 2340 px, while the Note 15 has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2392 px, which gives it a marginally higher pixel count.

The refresh rate differs between the two models, with the A17 supporting 90Hz, while the Note 15 features a 120Hz refresh rate, offering a smoother scrolling and gaming experience. Both devices include branded damage-resistant glass for added durability. Neither device supports HDR10 or HDR10+, and both support Always-On Display, which shows key information without unlocking the phone. Neither phone supports Dolby Vision or includes a secondary screen. Both devices also have a touch screen.

Overall, both displays are similar in many ways, with the Note 15 having a larger screen, slightly higher pixel density, and a higher refresh rate compared to the A17. However, the differences in resolution and pixel density are relatively small and should not dramatically affect the viewing experience.

The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G comes with 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, paired with the Samsung Exynos 1330 chipset. Its CPU consists of 2 high-performance cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 efficiency cores at 2 GHz, while the GPU is the Mali G68 MP2, clocked at 800 MHz. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G offers the same internal storage of 256GB but with 12GB of RAM. It uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, which features a different CPU configuration with 4 high-performance cores at 2.4 GHz and 4 efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. Like the A17, the Note 15's GPU is also clocked at 800 MHz, but it uses the Adreno 710 GPU instead of the Mali G68 MP2.

In terms of RAM speed, the A17 is faster at 3200 MHz, compared to the Note 15's 2750 MHz. The A17's semiconductor size is 5 nm, which is slightly larger than the 4 nm size of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 in the Note 15. The A17 has a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, significantly higher than the 25.6 GB/s offered by the Note 15. Both phones support 64-bit processing, DirectX 12, and have integrated graphics, using big.LITTLE technology and 8 CPU threads. The A17 has a lower Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 5W, while the Note 15's TDP is 7W.

While both devices have similar internal storage and GPU clock speeds, the A17 has an advantage in memory bandwidth and RAM speed. However, the Note 15 has a more powerful chipset with a smaller semiconductor size and higher RAM capacity, which may provide better multitasking capabilities. The differences in CPU speeds, TDP, and semiconductor size also highlight their respective design choices for performance and energy efficiency.

The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP main camera, a 5MP secondary camera, and a 2MP tertiary camera, while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G has a dual-camera system with a 50MP main camera and a 2MP secondary camera. The A17 has a 13MP front camera, whereas the Note 15 offers an 8MP front camera. Both devices have CMOS sensors and include features like continuous autofocus during video recording, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and the ability to shoot in slow motion. The A17 includes built-in optical image stabilization, which the Note 15 lacks.

When it comes to video recording, the A17 supports 1080p resolution at 30 fps, while the Note 15 can record at a higher 2160p (4K) at 30 fps. Both phones include a flash with one LED, a built-in HDR mode, and manual exposure control. Neither device has a dual-tone LED flash or a front-facing LED flash. Both models offer features like manual ISO, serial shot mode, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera, as well as timelapse recording.

While both phones share several camera capabilities like manual focus, touch autofocus, and HDR, the A17’s added optical image stabilization may help with stability in photos and videos. The Note 15 offers a higher resolution for video recording but has a lower front camera megapixel count. Both devices support similar shooting modes, though the A17’s front camera resolution is notably higher at 13MP compared to the Note 15’s 8MP.

Both the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G run Android 15 and share a number of similar features, including clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. Neither device supports Mail Privacy Protection or Wi-Fi password sharing, but both offer battery health checks and an extra dim mode. They also support on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media pickers, dark mode, and customizable notifications.

Both devices support features like split-screen, picture-in-picture (PiP), offloading apps, full-page screenshots, Live Text, and widgets. Neither phone supports Quick Start, and both can track the device's current position, are multi-user systems, and offer offline voice recognition with voice commands. However, neither device blocks cross-site tracking, and neither can be used as a PC.

In terms of differences, the main distinctions between the two phones in this category are minimal, as both devices are equipped with almost identical software features, including the same Android version, privacy settings, and customization options. The only key difference is that the Note 15 has no additional features not found on the A17 in the provided specs.

The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G has a slightly larger 5800 mAh battery. Both devices do not support wireless charging or reverse wireless charging. They both support fast charging, but the A17 charges at a speed of 25W, whereas the Note 15 charges at a faster 45W. Neither device has a removable battery, but both have a battery level indicator and feature rechargeable batteries.

Overall, the Note 15 has a larger battery capacity and faster charging speed compared to the A17, although both devices share similar core battery features such as a non-removable rechargeable battery and fast charging support.

Both the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning neither device supports wired audio connections directly through a headphone port. When it comes to audio output, the A17 does not feature stereo speakers, while the Note 15 is equipped with stereo speakers, offering potentially richer sound. Neither phone supports aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless audio codecs. However, the Note 15 stands out with its support for LDAC, which allows for high-quality wireless audio streaming, a feature that the A17 does not have.

In summary, the main differences lie in the audio output capabilities, with the Note 15 offering stereo speakers and LDAC support, while the A17 does not include these features. Both phones, however, lack a 3.5 mm audio jack and support the same set of audio codecs.

Both the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G support 5G connectivity and offer similar Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). Both devices feature 2 SIM card slots and have USB Type-C with USB version 2. The A17 uses Bluetooth 5.3, while the Note 15 is equipped with Bluetooth 5.1. Both phones have NFC support, fingerprint scanners, and GPS with a compass. The A17 has a download speed of 2550 Mbits/s and an upload speed of 1280 Mbits/s, whereas the Note 15 has slightly higher download and upload speeds, at 2900 Mbits/s and 1600 Mbits/s, respectively.

In terms of sensors, both devices come with a gyroscope, accelerometer, and cellular module. The A17 also supports Galileo, while the Note 15 provides the same and additionally includes an infrared sensor, which the A17 lacks. Neither phone has a barometer, HDMI output, or 3D facial recognition, and neither supports ANT+, motion tracking, or optical tracking. Neither device offers an iris scanner or a stylus, and both lack a built-in projector.

While both phones share many connectivity features, the Note 15 stands out with its slightly faster download and upload speeds, as well as the inclusion of an infrared sensor. The A17, on the other hand, offers Bluetooth 5.3 for a more recent Bluetooth version.

Both the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G feature a video light, which enhances video recording in low-light conditions. However, the two devices differ in display characteristics. The A17 does not have a curved display, while the Note 15 includes a curved display, providing a different aesthetic and viewing experience. Neither phone has sapphire glass display or an e-paper display.

In summary, the main distinction in this category is the curved display present on the Note 15, while both phones share the presence of a video light and lack sapphire glass or e-paper displays.