Samsung Galaxy F36 5G VS Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G differ in their water resistance, with the former offering no water resistance, while the latter is waterproof. In terms of weight, the Galaxy F36 is heavier at 197 g compared to the iQOO Z10R's 184 g, making the Vivo device slightly lighter. The thickness of both phones is similar, with the F36 being 7.7 mm thick and the Z10R slightly slimmer at 7.4 mm.

When it comes to dimensions, the Samsung Galaxy F36 is 164.4 mm tall and 77.9 mm wide, resulting in a slightly larger form factor compared to the Vivo iQOO Z10R, which is 163.3 mm tall and 76.7 mm wide. This makes the Vivo phone a little more compact in size.

The volume of the devices also shows a difference, with the Galaxy F36 having a larger volume of 98.612 cm³ compared to the Z10R’s 92.686 cm³, reflecting its larger overall size. Neither device features a rugged build or the ability to fold, indicating that both are traditional, non-flexible smartphones.

Both the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G feature OLED/AMOLED displays with similar specifications, offering a high-quality viewing experience. The screen size on the F36 is 6.7 inches, while the Z10R has a slightly larger 6.77-inch display. The pixel density is also quite close, with the Galaxy F36 at 385 ppi and the Z10R at 388 ppi, making both screens sharp and detailed.

In terms of resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F36 has a resolution of 1080 x 2340 px, while the Vivo iQOO Z10R boasts a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2392 px. Despite the difference in resolution, both devices offer a Full HD+ experience. Both displays support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and responsiveness.

Both phones also share several features, such as an Always-On Display, a touch screen, and the absence of branded damage-resistant glass. Neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, and neither includes a secondary screen. Overall, both displays are quite similar in terms of features and performance, with slight differences in screen size and resolution.

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G differ significantly in terms of performance specifications. The F36 offers 128GB of internal storage and 6GB of RAM, while the Z10R comes with a larger 256GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, providing more capacity for both storage and multitasking. The F36 is powered by the Samsung Exynos 1380 chipset, paired with a Mali G68 MP5 GPU, whereas the Z10R uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 chipset, coupled with a Mali G615 MC2 GPU. The Z10R's chipset is likely to offer slightly better performance given its higher clock speeds and newer architecture.

The Galaxy F36's CPU features 4 cores at 2.4 GHz and 4 cores at 2 GHz, while the iQOO Z10R's CPU also uses a big.LITTLE architecture, but with 4 cores at 2.6 GHz and 4 cores at 2 GHz. This gives the Z10R a slight advantage in CPU performance, particularly for tasks that can utilize the higher 2.6 GHz cores. Additionally, the Z10R has a GPU clock speed of 1047 MHz, which is higher than the F36's 950 MHz, potentially resulting in better graphics performance.

In terms of memory speed, the F36 operates at 3200 MHz RAM, while the Z10R offers much faster 6400 MHz RAM. This substantial difference in RAM speed may lead to faster data processing on the Z10R. The Galaxy F36's semiconductor size is 5 nm, while the Z10R benefits from a smaller 4 nm process, which may lead to more efficient power usage and slightly better overall performance. The F36 supports up to 8GB of RAM, while the Z10R supports a larger maximum of 16GB, further adding to its multitasking capabilities. Both devices support 64-bit architecture, DirectX 12, and HMP, ensuring a modern performance foundation.

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G both offer dual-lens main cameras, but with some key differences in their configurations. The Galaxy F36 features a 50 MP primary camera, an 8 MP secondary camera, and a 2 MP third lens. The iQOO Z10R has a 50 MP primary camera and a 2 MP secondary lens. The wide apertures for these cameras differ as well, with the F36 having 1.8f for the 50 MP lens, 2.2f for the 8 MP lens, and 2.4f for the 2 MP lens, while the Z10R has a 2.4f aperture for its 50 MP lens and a 1.8f for the 2 MP lens.

Both devices can record video at 2160 x 30 fps, feature optical image stabilization, and have continuous autofocus when recording. Additionally, both have phase-detection autofocus for photos, slow-motion video support, and in-camera panorama creation capabilities. Neither device offers a dual-tone LED flash, front-facing LED flash, laser autofocus, 360° panorama shooting, or 3D photo/video recording capabilities. Both phones also include manual exposure, manual ISO, manual focus, touch autofocus, and HDR mode for enhanced photo quality.

The front cameras are another point of difference. The Samsung Galaxy F36 has a 13 MP front camera with a 2.2f aperture, while the Vivo iQOO Z10R comes with a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera, featuring a slightly wider 2.45f aperture. Both devices lack a front-facing LED flash but do support timelapse functions. Neither device includes HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both phones feature CMOS sensors, though neither includes a BSI sensor.

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G both run Android 15 and offer a nearly identical set of software features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, as well as theme customization, dark mode, and dynamic theming. They also support blocking app tracking and offer customizable notifications, media picker, and the ability to offload apps. Other common features include the ability to play games while they download, Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health check, and an extra dim mode for improved visibility in low light.

In terms of privacy and accessibility, both phones provide on-device machine learning, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and multi-user system support. They can track the device’s current position, offer PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode, and support widgets. They also allow for full-page screenshots, Live Text, sharing intents, and have a child lock feature.

The only notable differences between the two devices are that neither offers direct OS updates, and both lack the Quick Start feature. Both phones also do not include the ability to be used as a PC, and neither has focus modes. Overall, the software experience is highly similar across both the Galaxy F36 and iQOO Z10R, with little to differentiate them in terms of operating system features.

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G both feature large batteries, though with a few differences. The F36 has a 5000 mAh battery, while the Z10R is equipped with a slightly larger 5700 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging, but the F36 offers a charging speed of 25W, whereas the Z10R supports a faster 44W charging speed. Neither device supports wireless charging, and both have rechargeable batteries that cannot be removed.

Both phones include a battery level indicator to keep track of charge status, ensuring users can monitor battery levels easily. Additionally, both devices feature a rechargeable battery, which is a standard expectation in modern smartphones.

Overall, while both devices offer substantial battery capacity and fast charging, the iQOO Z10R has the advantage in terms of charging speed and slightly larger battery size, offering a potentially faster recharge and a longer-lasting battery.

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G share very similar audio specifications. Neither device includes a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. Both phones are equipped with stereo speakers, which should provide a more immersive sound experience compared to single-speaker setups.

Neither device supports any advanced Bluetooth audio codecs such as aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, which may limit high-quality wireless audio streaming. Additionally, both phones lack a built-in radio, so users won't be able to listen to FM radio directly on these devices.

Overall, the audio experience is similar on both phones, with both featuring stereo speakers but lacking wired audio support, advanced Bluetooth audio codecs, and a radio function.

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G both support 5G connectivity and share a similar set of connectivity features. Both devices are equipped with Wi-Fi versions 4 (802.11n), 5 (802.11ac), and 6 (802.11ax), ensuring broad compatibility with modern Wi-Fi networks. They also support dual SIM cards, allowing users to use two numbers simultaneously. The F36 supports NFC, while the Z10R does not.

Both phones have Bluetooth connectivity, with the F36 featuring Bluetooth 5.3 and the Z10R featuring Bluetooth 5.4, which offers a slightly more advanced version. Both devices have USB Type-C ports with USB version 2, allowing for fast data transfer and charging. The F36 includes an external memory slot for expandable storage, while the Z10R does not.

In terms of sensors and features, both devices include a fingerprint scanner, a gyroscope, GPS, a compass, and an accelerometer. The F36 supports Galileo, while the Z10R does not mention this explicitly. Both phones lack features like an infrared sensor, barometer, HDMI output, or motion and optical tracking. Neither device includes a stylus or built-in projector. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G offers slightly more in terms of NFC, external memory support, and Galileo support compared to the Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G.

The Samsung Galaxy F36 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G both come equipped with a video light, which can be useful for low-light video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning both have more traditional display types without the added benefits of these specialized features.

Overall, the two devices are quite similar in terms of miscellaneous features, with both providing the same capabilities regarding video lighting and standard display technologies.

There are no significant differences in this category between the two phones.