Both devices are built on a 3 nm process, but they bet on different silicon. The Tab S11 Ultra runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus, while the RedMagic Astra deploys the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite — and the benchmarks reflect a consistent advantage for the Astra: a Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 10,059 versus 8,969, and a single-core score of 3,234 versus 2,874. That roughly 12% multi-core lead is meaningful for sustained heavy workloads like video rendering or gaming, though both chips are comfortably in flagship territory for everyday tasks.
RAM tells a nuanced story. The Astra ships with 24 GB versus the Tab S11 Ultra's 16 GB in their respective base configurations, which benefits aggressive multitasking and keeping more apps live in memory. Samsung counters with a significantly faster RAM speed of 10,667 MHz compared to the Astra's 5,300 MHz, and a larger 12 MB L3 cache versus 8 MB — factors that help reduce latency in compute-intensive tasks even if raw throughput is comparable, with both devices posting nearly identical memory bandwidth around 85 GB/s. The Astra also supports ECC memory, adding error-correction that matters for data-integrity-sensitive professional workloads. On GPU clock speed, the Tab S11 Ultra's Immortalis G925 at 1,300 MHz runs faster than the Astra's Adreno 830 at 1,100 MHz, though real-world graphics performance depends heavily on the full architecture and thermal envelope.
One practical differentiator is the Tab S11 Ultra's external memory slot, allowing storage expansion beyond the 1 TB base — something the Astra foregoes entirely. Taken together, the RedMagic Astra holds the edge in raw CPU benchmark performance and default RAM capacity, while the Tab S11 Ultra offers faster memory speeds, a larger cache, and expandable storage. Users prioritizing peak processing throughput will lean toward the Astra; those who value storage flexibility and memory responsiveness will find the Tab S11 Ultra more accommodating.