Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB VS Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

The Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB share many similar specs, with some key differences in performance. Both products feature a GPU memory speed of 2518 MHz, 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 render output units (ROPs). Additionally, both support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) operations.

When comparing their GPU clock speeds, the Nitro+ model has a higher base clock at 1900 MHz, compared to the Pulse model's 1700 MHz. The Nitro+ also has a higher GPU turbo speed, reaching 3320 MHz, while the Pulse model achieves 3290 MHz. The Nitro+ has a slightly higher pixel rate of 212.5 GPixel/s, compared to the Pulse's 210.6 GPixel/s. Similarly, the Nitro+ leads in floating-point performance, delivering 27.2 TFLOPS versus the Pulse's 26.95 TFLOPS. Lastly, the Nitro+ offers a higher texture rate at 425 GTexels/s, while the Pulse provides 421.1 GTexels/s.

While the differences in these specs are relatively small, the Nitro+ does show slight performance advantages in clock speed, pixel rate, floating-point performance, and texture rate, but both products are closely matched overall.

The memory specifications for the Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB are identical across the board. Both products are equipped with 16GB of VRAM, utilizing GDDR6 memory. The effective memory speed for both models is 20000 MHz, and both feature a memory bus width of 128-bit. Additionally, both cards support ECC memory, and they offer the same maximum memory bandwidth of 322.3 GB/s.

As both the Nitro+ and Pulse share these memory specifications, there are no differences in this category between the two products. Both deliver the same memory performance and support the same features.

Overall, the memory specs of these two models are perfectly matched, with no distinction between them in terms of capacity, speed, bandwidth, or other memory-related features.

The Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB share many similar features, with only a few differences. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.2, and are capable of multi-display setups. They also both support ray tracing, 3D technology, and have FSR4, though neither supports DLSS or XeSS (XMX). Both cards also feature AMD SAM (Resizable BAR) support and are not equipped with LHR (Lite Hash Rate) technology.

The main distinction between the two products lies in RGB lighting. The Nitro+ model comes with RGB lighting, while the Pulse model does not. Additionally, both cards support up to three displays, providing the same level of multi-monitor functionality.

Overall, the differences between the Nitro+ and Pulse in this features category are minimal, with the Nitro+ offering RGB lighting as the only noticeable variation.

The port configurations for the Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB are identical. Both models feature one HDMI output, supporting HDMI 2.1b. They each have two DisplayPort outputs, but neither includes USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

In terms of port offerings, there is no difference between the two products; both provide the same combination of HDMI and DisplayPort outputs.

Overall, the port specifications are perfectly matched across both the Nitro+ and Pulse models, with no distinctions in the types or number of available ports.

The Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB share several key specifications, but there are a few differences in their physical characteristics and power requirements. Both products use the RDNA 4.0 GPU architecture, have a semiconductor size of 4 nm, and contain 29,700 million transistors. Both also support PCI Express version 5.0, ensuring high-speed data transfer.

When it comes to thermal design power (TDP), the Nitro+ has a higher TDP of 182W, compared to the Pulse's 170W. This difference in TDP may indicate that the Nitro+ is designed to handle slightly higher power consumption, possibly due to its higher clock speeds or other factors. In terms of physical size, the Nitro+ is larger, with a width of 300 mm and a height of 131 mm, while the Pulse is more compact, measuring 240 mm in width and 124 mm in height.

Both models lack air-water cooling systems, so they rely on traditional air-based cooling solutions. Overall, the main differences in this category are the Nitro+'s higher TDP and larger physical dimensions compared to the Pulse.