TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra VS Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

Both the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro share an IP68 waterproof rating, meaning neither has an advantage in water and dust resistance — both can handle submersion in fresh water under standard conditions. Neither device advertises a rugged build or a foldable form factor, so they compete as conventional, protection-rated slabs.

Where they diverge meaningfully is in physical footprint. The NxtPaper 60 Ultra is noticeably larger across every dimension — 174.5 × 81.2 mm versus the Poco F7 Pro's 160.3 × 75 mm — translating to a volume of roughly 107.7 cm³ compared to 97.4 cm³. In practice, the TCL will feel significantly more expansive in hand and may be harder to reach across one-handed. Conversely, the Poco F7 Pro's smaller frame makes it more pocketable and easier to grip for users with smaller hands.

On weight, the Poco F7 Pro holds a clear edge at 206 g versus the NxtPaper 60 Ultra's 227 g — a 21 g difference that is perceptible during extended use, such as reading or media consumption. Interestingly, despite being smaller and lighter, the Poco F7 Pro is slightly thicker at 8.1 mm compared to the TCL's slimmer 7.6 mm profile. Overall, the Poco F7 Pro has the design edge for ergonomics and portability, while the NxtPaper 60 Ultra's larger body is neither a strength nor a weakness on its own — it simply implies a bigger display, which may be the trade-off some users actively seek.

The display category is where these two phones diverge most dramatically. The TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra uses an LCD IPS panel at 7.2″, while the Poco F7 Pro deploys an OLED/AMOLED panel at 6.67″. Panel technology matters far more than screen size here: OLED produces true blacks and infinite contrast by turning pixels off individually, delivers punchier colors, and enables the Always-On Display feature the TCL simply cannot offer. The NxtPaper 60 Ultra's larger canvas may suit media consumption or reading, but its LCD foundation is a fundamental technology gap.

The resolution and brightness gaps reinforce the Poco F7 Pro's display superiority. At 1440 × 3200 px and 526 ppi, the Poco renders text and fine detail with exceptional sharpness — noticeably crisper than the NxtPaper 60 Ultra's 1080 × 2340 px at 358 ppi. On brightness, the difference is stark: 1800 nits versus 780 nits means the Poco F7 Pro is far more legible under direct sunlight, a practical advantage for outdoor use. Both panels run at 120Hz, so scrolling and animation smoothness are equivalent.

The Poco F7 Pro also sweeps the HDR support category, offering HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision certification — all absent on the NxtPaper 60 Ultra. This means streaming HDR content from compatible platforms will render with full dynamic range and color grading on the Poco, while the TCL will display a tone-mapped fallback. Both devices feature branded damage-resistant glass, so neither has a durability edge. Overall, the Poco F7 Pro holds a commanding display advantage across nearly every meaningful metric.

At a surface level, these two phones look comparable — matching 12GB of RAM, 512GB of storage, identical 4 nm fabrication, and DDR5 memory. But underneath those shared figures, the silicon tells a very different story. The Poco F7 Pro is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, a named, well-documented flagship-tier chipset. The NxtPaper 60 Ultra's SoC name is absent from the data, but its CPU configuration — 4 × 2.6 GHz + 4 × 2 GHz — is considerably more modest than the Poco's aggressive cluster of up to 3.3 GHz across its prime and performance cores. In demanding workloads like gaming, video editing, or multitasking, that CPU headroom translates directly into faster processing and sustained responsiveness.

The most telling gap is memory bandwidth: the Poco F7 Pro's 76.6 GB/s dwarfs the NxtPaper 60 Ultra's 25.6 GB/s — nearly a threefold difference. High memory bandwidth is critical for feeding the GPU with data quickly, which directly impacts gaming frame rates, image processing, and AI-driven tasks. Speaking of the GPU, the Poco's Adreno 750 is a flagship-class graphics processor, while the NxtPaper 60 Ultra's Mali G615 MC2 is a more entry-level unit. The TCL does clock its GPU slightly higher at 1047 MHz versus 900 MHz, and its RAM runs at a faster 6400 MHz, but these advantages are too narrow to offset the Poco's structural GPU and bandwidth superiority.

The Poco F7 Pro also supports a higher maximum memory configuration of 24GB versus the TCL's 16GB ceiling, which matters for future-proofing and heavy multitasking scenarios. On performance, the Poco F7 Pro holds a clear and substantial advantage across CPU throughput, GPU capability, and memory bandwidth — the metrics that matter most in real-world usage.

The camera hardware splits interestingly between these two devices, with each holding a distinct advantage in different areas. The NxtPaper 60 Ultra fields a triple-camera system (50 + 50 + 8 MP) against the Poco F7 Pro's dual-camera setup (50 + 8 MP). More importantly, the TCL includes 3x optical zoom while the Poco F7 Pro lists no optical zoom — a significant real-world gap. Optical zoom preserves image quality when shooting distant subjects, whereas digital zoom degrades sharpness. For users who frequently photograph subjects at a distance, the TCL's telephoto capability is a meaningful advantage.

Flip the lens to video, and the advantage shifts decisively to the Poco F7 Pro. It supports 4320p at 24 fps — full 8K recording — while the NxtPaper 60 Ultra tops out at 4K (2160p) at 30 fps. The Poco also has a practical flash edge: it uses a dual-tone LED flash with 2 LEDs, which produces more accurate and flattering color rendition in low-light shots compared to the TCL's single-LED flash. On selfies, the NxtPaper 60 Ultra counters with a 32MP front camera versus the Poco's 20MP, which means finer detail in portrait and video call scenarios.

Beyond those differentiators, the two phones are remarkably evenly matched in camera features — both offer OIS, phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during video, slow-motion, HDR mode, timelapse, panorama, and a full suite of manual controls. Overall, this category is genuinely split: the NxtPaper 60 Ultra wins for zoom photography and selfie resolution, while the Poco F7 Pro takes the lead in video ceiling and flash quality. Which phone ″wins″ cameras depends entirely on how the user shoots.

Rarely does a spec group produce a result this unambiguous: the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro are in a complete tie across every single operating system data point provided. Both ship with Android 15, and their feature sets are identical — from privacy controls like location, camera, and microphone permissions to productivity staples like split-screen multitasking, Picture-in-Picture, widgets, and dynamic theming.

Notably, neither device receives direct OS updates — meaning updates are routed through the manufacturer rather than delivered straight from Google. This is common for Android OEMs but worth flagging, as it can mean slower rollouts compared to devices on Android One or Google's own Pixel line. Both phones also lack Wi-Fi password sharing and Focus Modes, so users who rely on those features will find the same gap on either device.

Since no differentiating data exists within this group, the operating system category is a straight draw. Any distinction in actual software experience — such as the depth of each manufacturer's Android skin, bloatware policies, or long-term update commitments — falls outside the provided specs and cannot be factored into this comparison.

Battery is another category where the Poco F7 Pro pulls ahead on paper. Its 6000 mAh cell outpaces the NxtPaper 60 Ultra's 5200 mAh by a meaningful 800 mAh — a gap that, under similar usage conditions, generally translates to a noticeable difference in screen-on time and the ability to stretch through a heavy day without reaching for a cable. The TCL's larger display may offset some of that raw capacity advantage by drawing more power, making the real-world gap potentially wider than the numbers alone suggest.

The charging speed difference is even more pronounced. The Poco F7 Pro supports 90W fast charging compared to the NxtPaper 60 Ultra's 33W — nearly three times faster. In practical terms, 90W charging can bring a depleted battery to a meaningful charge level in well under 30 minutes, while 33W, though not slow by absolute standards, will require considerably more time to achieve the same result. Both phones include a charger in the box, which is worth noting given the industry trend of omitting one.

Neither device supports wireless charging, so that omission is a draw rather than a disadvantage for either. Overall, the Poco F7 Pro holds a clear battery advantage — it carries more capacity and replenishes it dramatically faster, making it the stronger choice for users who prioritize battery endurance and quick top-ups.

For wired audio, both phones are on equal footing — neither includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, so both users are pushed toward Bluetooth or USB-C audio solutions. On the speaker side, both devices feature stereo speakers, meaning spatial audio during media playback is available on either device without headphones.

Where the Poco F7 Pro meaningfully separates itself is in Bluetooth audio codec support. It includes aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, and LDAC — the NxtPaper 60 Ultra supports none of these. This matters significantly for wireless audio quality: LDAC, developed by Sony, transmits up to three times more data than standard Bluetooth SBC, enabling near-lossless audio over compatible headphones. aptX Adaptive is Qualcomm's flagship codec, dynamically adjusting bitrate for both quality and latency. The TCL, lacking all of these, will default to baseline SBC or AAC when paired with wireless headphones, which imposes a noticeable ceiling on audio fidelity regardless of headphone quality.

Neither device supports aptX Lossless, so that is a non-factor. The Poco F7 Pro holds a clear audio advantage for users who invest in quality wireless headphones — its codec support unlocks substantially higher fidelity that the NxtPaper 60 Ultra simply cannot access.

The two most meaningful differentiators in this category pull in opposite directions, leaving the group closely contested overall. On Wi-Fi, the Poco F7 Pro has a clear lead: it supports Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) and Wi-Fi 6E in addition to the earlier standards both phones share, while the NxtPaper 60 Ultra tops out at Wi-Fi 6. Wi-Fi 7 delivers significantly higher theoretical throughput, lower latency, and better performance in congested environments — a forward-looking advantage as Wi-Fi 7 routers become more common. For users in dense urban settings or those who transfer large files wirelessly, this gap is tangible.

The NxtPaper 60 Ultra counters with a built-in barometer, which the Poco F7 Pro lacks. A barometer enables more accurate altitude readings and can assist GPS precision in navigation apps, as well as support weather-sensing features. It is a niche but genuine hardware addition that the Poco simply does not offer. Everything else in this category — 5G, dual SIM, Bluetooth 5.4, USB Type-C (USB 2.0), NFC, fingerprint scanner, GPS, compass, gyroscope, accelerometer, infrared sensor, and Galileo satellite support — is identical between the two devices.

On balance, the Poco F7 Pro holds a slight connectivity edge, as Wi-Fi 7 support is a more broadly impactful feature than the TCL's barometer for the majority of users. That said, neither phone is lacking in any critical connectivity area — the gap here is narrow and largely future-facing.

This category is compact but contains one genuinely distinctive feature. Both phones include a video light and lack sapphire glass or a curved display — those data points are a clean draw. The sole differentiator is that the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra features an e-paper display mode, which the Poco F7 Pro does not offer at all.

An e-paper display is a niche but meaningful capability: it renders content in a low-power, paper-like visual mode that is significantly easier on the eyes during prolonged reading sessions and dramatically reduces battery consumption compared to a standard lit panel. For users who read e-books, documents, or articles for extended periods, this feature positions the NxtPaper 60 Ultra as a hybrid device that can function more like a dedicated e-reader — a use case the Poco F7 Pro cannot replicate. It is, notably, a defining feature of the TCL's product identity, as reflected in its ″NxtPaper″ branding.

The Poco F7 Pro offers no equivalent. For general smartphone users this omission is inconsequential, but for reading-focused users it is a clear and exclusive advantage for the TCL. The NxtPaper 60 Ultra wins this category outright on the strength of that single, purposeful differentiator.