Tecno Spark Go 5G VS ZTE Blade A76

Both the Tecno Spark Go 5G and ZTE Blade A76 offer water resistance, with the Tecno Spark Go 5G having an IP64 rating, while the ZTE Blade A76 features a slightly lower IP54 rating. In terms of weight, the ZTE Blade A76 is heavier at 203 g compared to the Tecno Spark Go 5G's 194 g. The dimensions also differ slightly, with the Tecno Spark Go 5G being a bit taller at 167.7 mm compared to the ZTE Blade A76's 163.3 mm, while the Tecno device is slightly wider at 77.7 mm, compared to the ZTE Blade A76's 74.8 mm. The thicknesses are quite close, with the Tecno Spark Go 5G measuring 8 mm and the ZTE Blade A76 at 8.2 mm.

The volume of the Tecno Spark Go 5G is larger at 104.24 cm³, compared to the ZTE Blade A76's 100.16 cm³. Both products do not feature a rugged build and are not foldable, which means they both share these design limitations. Overall, the two devices have similar design characteristics, with some minor differences in size and weight.

Overall, the Tecno Spark Go 5G is slightly larger and lighter, but both devices share water resistance and lack rugged or foldable features.

Both the Tecno Spark Go 5G and ZTE Blade A76 feature LCD, IPS displays with similar characteristics. The Tecno Spark Go 5G has a 6.74″ screen, while the ZTE Blade A76 is slightly larger at 6.75″. The pixel density is also very close, with the Tecno Spark Go 5G offering 260 ppi and the ZTE Blade A76 providing a slightly higher 262 ppi. Both devices have a resolution of 720 x 1600 px (Tecno Spark Go 5G) and 720 x 1612 px (ZTE Blade A76), which are nearly identical but differ slightly in the number of pixels on the vertical axis.

When it comes to refresh rate, the Tecno Spark Go 5G supports a 120Hz refresh rate, which is higher than the 90Hz refresh rate of the ZTE Blade A76. Neither device has branded damage-resistant glass, HDR10, HDR10+, Always-On Display, or supports Dolby Vision. Both products also lack a secondary screen and feature touchscreens.

Overall, the display specifications of both devices are quite similar, with the Tecno Spark Go 5G offering a slightly higher refresh rate and the ZTE Blade A76 having a marginally larger screen size and pixel density.

The Tecno Spark Go 5G and ZTE Blade A76 have identical internal storage of 128GB, which offers the same capacity for both devices. In terms of RAM, the Tecno Spark Go 5G comes with 4GB, while the ZTE Blade A76 has a larger 6GB of RAM. Both devices feature 2133 MHz RAM speed and support 64-bit processing. The chipset in the Tecno Spark Go 5G is the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, whereas the ZTE Blade A76 is powered by the Unisoc Tanggula T760. The CPU configurations also differ, with the Tecno Spark Go 5G offering a more powerful combination of 2 x 2.5 GHz and 6 x 2 GHz cores, compared to the ZTE Blade A76's 4 x 2.2 GHz and 4 x 1.8 GHz cores.

Both devices have integrated LTE and support DirectX 12, indicating similar graphics capabilities. The Tecno Spark Go 5G is built with a 6 nm semiconductor, while the ZTE Blade A76 uses a 7 nm semiconductor. Both devices feature integrated graphics with the Tecno Spark Go 5G using the Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU and the ZTE Blade A76 using the Mali-G57 GPU.

Overall, while the two devices share several key specifications like internal storage, RAM speed, and 64-bit support, the Tecno Spark Go 5G has a faster CPU configuration and a smaller semiconductor size, whereas the ZTE Blade A76 offers more RAM but with a slightly less powerful CPU setup.

The Tecno Spark Go 5G and ZTE Blade A76 both feature 50 MP main cameras, but the ZTE Blade A76 has a dual-lens main camera setup, while the Tecno Spark Go 5G uses a single-lens camera. For front cameras, the Tecno Spark Go 5G has a 5 MP front camera, while the ZTE Blade A76 has a higher 8 MP front camera. Both devices lack built-in optical image stabilization and feature CMOS sensors.

Both phones support continuous autofocus when recording video, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and slow-motion video recording. The video recording resolution of the Tecno Spark Go 5G's main camera is 1440 x 30 fps, while the ZTE Blade A76 offers a higher resolution of 2160 x 30 fps. Both devices have a flash, but the ZTE Blade A76 has only one flash LED compared to the two in the Tecno Spark Go 5G.

Both phones support manual exposure, manual ISO, and manual focus. They also allow for in-camera panorama creation, but neither has laser autofocus, a front-facing LED flash, or dual-lens front cameras. Additionally, neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, shoots raw images, or has 3D photo/video capabilities. Overall, the ZTE Blade A76 offers a higher resolution front camera, a dual-lens main camera, and better video recording resolution, while the Tecno Spark Go 5G provides a slightly higher number of flash LEDs in the main camera.

The Tecno Spark Go 5G and ZTE Blade A76 both run on Android 15 and offer similar privacy features, including clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. Neither device includes Mail Privacy Protection, but both allow theme customization and block app tracking. Neither product blocks cross-site tracking. Both devices also feature on-device machine learning, notification permissions, and media pickers, along with the ability to play games while downloading.

Both phones have dark mode, an extra dim mode, battery health checks, and the option to offload apps. However, neither supports focus modes or quick start. Both phones also feature dynamic theming, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split-screen functionality. Neither device receives direct OS updates, and both support Picture-in-Picture (PiP) and share intents.

Other shared features include support for widgets, free and open-source software, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the ability to track the current position of the device. Both devices are multi-user systems and have a child lock. The ZTE Blade A76 and Tecno Spark Go 5G are similar in operating system features, with no significant differences in functionality.

The Tecno Spark Go 5G has a larger 6000 mAh battery compared to the ZTE Blade A76's 5000 mAh battery. Neither device supports wireless charging, and both feature rechargeable batteries. Both also have a battery level indicator to help monitor charge, and neither device has a removable battery.

Additionally, the Tecno Spark Go 5G supports fast charging, while the ZTE Blade A76 does not.

In summary, the Tecno Spark Go 5G offers a larger battery capacity and fast charging support, while the ZTE Blade A76 has a smaller battery and lacks fast charging capabilities.

Both the Tecno Spark Go 5G and ZTE Blade A76 have a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing for wired audio connections. Neither device features stereo speakers, and both lack support for advanced Bluetooth audio technologies such as aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless.

In summary, the audio features of both devices are quite similar, offering a 3.5 mm audio jack but lacking stereo speakers or high-end Bluetooth audio codec support.

Both the Tecno Spark Go 5G and ZTE Blade A76 support 5G connectivity, have dual SIM card slots, and feature Wi-Fi versions Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). The Bluetooth version differs slightly, with the Tecno Spark Go 5G using Bluetooth 5.3 and the ZTE Blade A76 featuring Bluetooth 5.4. The Tecno Spark Go 5G offers an external memory slot, while the ZTE Blade A76 does not provide this option.

Both devices come with USB Type-C ports, fingerprint scanners, GPS support, accelerometers, and cellular modules. Neither supports NFC in the Tecno Spark Go 5G, but the ZTE Blade A76 does have NFC support. Both phones lack emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, ANT+ support, heart rate monitors, infrared sensors, barometers, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanners, stylus support, motion tracking, optical tracking, or built-in projectors.

In terms of navigation, both phones support Galileo, but the ZTE Blade A76 offers NFC, while the Tecno Spark Go 5G includes an external memory slot. The connectivity and feature sets of both phones are generally similar, with minor differences in Bluetooth version, NFC, and external storage capabilities.

Both the Tecno Spark Go 5G and ZTE Blade A76 are equipped with a video light, allowing for better video recording in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays.

Overall, the two devices are identical in this category, offering the same video light functionality and lacking sapphire glass, curved, or e-paper displays.