Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal VS Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G

Both the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G are designed with durability in mind, boasting a rugged build and a waterproof rating of IP68. This means both devices are resistant to dust and can be submerged in water up to a depth of 1.5 meters. The dimensions of the two models are nearly identical, with the Armor 29 Pro Thermal having a height of 177.4 mm and the Armor 29 Ultra 5G measuring 177.3 mm in height. The width and thickness of both models are also the same, at 85.6 mm and 33.8 mm, respectively. The volume of the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal is 513.27 cm³, slightly larger than the Armor 29 Ultra 5G, which has a volume of 512.98 cm³. Both phones weigh 688 g, and neither can be folded.

In terms of water resistance, both models share the same waterproof rating of IP68 and the same waterproof depth of 1.5 meters. The Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Armor 29 Ultra 5G both promise high durability with their rugged build, offering similar levels of protection against water and dust ingress. There is no significant difference between the two when it comes to their water resistance or waterproof depth.

Overall, the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G share nearly identical specifications in terms of design, with only a minor difference in volume (0.29 cm³). Both devices offer a robust and reliable build that ensures durability in harsh conditions.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G have identical display specifications across the board. Both models feature an OLED/AMOLED display type, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The screen size is the same for both at 6.67″, with a resolution of 1080 x 2400 px, resulting in a pixel density of 395 ppi. This ensures sharp visuals on both devices, and they also share a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and gameplay.

Both devices are equipped with branded damage-resistant glass, specifically Gorilla Glass 3, providing added durability against scratches and drops. Neither model supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, so users won’t have access to these advanced color and contrast enhancements. Additionally, both phones feature a secondary screen with a resolution of 340 x 340px, providing extra functionality, though details about its usage aren’t specified in the comparison.

Both the Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Armor 29 Ultra 5G also have touchscreens, which is a standard feature for modern smartphones. Overall, the display specifications of these two models are identical, ensuring a consistent viewing experience across both devices.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G both offer strong performance with impressive specifications, though there are a few key differences. Both models come with 16GB of RAM and use DDR5 memory. The Armor 29 Pro Thermal has a MediaTek Dimensity 7400 chipset with a CPU configuration of 4 x 2.6 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz cores, while the Armor 29 Ultra 5G features the more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9300 Plus, with a CPU configuration of 1 x 3.4 GHz, 3 x 2.85 GHz, and 4 x 2 GHz cores. This means the Ultra 5G offers higher maximum clock speeds, particularly with the 3.4 GHz core.

In terms of graphics, the Armor 29 Pro Thermal is equipped with the Mali G615 MC2 GPU, clocked at 1047 MHz, whereas the Armor 29 Ultra 5G comes with the more advanced Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU, clocked at 1300 MHz. This results in the Ultra 5G offering potentially better GPU performance, especially for graphics-intensive tasks. Both devices support integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and big.LITTLE technology, ensuring efficient power management and multitasking capabilities.

The Armor 29 Pro Thermal’s maximum memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s, whereas the Ultra 5G has a significantly higher bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Additionally, the Armor 29 Pro Thermal has a maximum memory capacity of 16GB, while the Ultra 5G can support up to 24GB. The Ultra 5G also has a much higher number of transistors, with 22,700 million compared to the Armor 29 Pro Thermal's 6,200 million, indicating a more complex and potentially more capable chipset. The semiconductor size is the same for both models at 4 nm, and both devices support 64-bit processing and DirectX 12.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G share similar camera specifications, but there are a few notable differences. Both models feature a triple-lens main camera setup with 64 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP lenses. The wide apertures for the main cameras differ slightly: the Armor 29 Pro Thermal has apertures of f/1.8, f/2, and f/2.2, while the Armor 29 Ultra 5G has apertures of f/1.8, f/1.9, and f/2.2. Both devices have a 50 MP front camera with a wide aperture of f/2.5.

Both phones support similar features such as phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus for videos, manual exposure, manual ISO, and the ability to shoot panoramas in-camera. Neither model offers optical zoom or optical image stabilization, and both lack a front-facing LED flash. Additionally, both devices support slow-motion video recording and have a built-in HDR mode, though they do not support HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording.

When it comes to video recording, the Armor 29 Pro Thermal can record videos at 2160 x 30 fps, while the Armor 29 Ultra 5G offers a higher resolution of 4320 x 30 fps. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G also has a single LED flash with one flash LED, whereas the Armor 29 Pro Thermal has a dual-tone LED flash with four LEDs. Both models lack a BSI sensor and shoot in raw formats. Despite these differences, both devices provide a solid camera experience with similar capabilities overall.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G both run on Android 15 and share a broad range of operating system features. Both devices offer clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. They also support dark mode, theme customization, dynamic theming, and customizable notifications, ensuring a flexible user experience. Both models come with features like Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen support, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and offline voice recognition, allowing users to multitask and interact with the devices in various ways.

Neither model supports Mail Privacy Protection, Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, or Quick Start. Both devices do not receive direct OS updates, and neither can be used as a PC. The Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Armor 29 Ultra 5G also support widgets, sharing intents, and have a child lock feature for added security. Additionally, both phones track the current position of the device, are multi-user systems, and offer voice commands for hands-free control.

While the two devices are very similar in terms of their operating system features, they share the same set of capabilities, offering a robust and customizable Android 15 experience. No key differences are observed between them in this category, making their OS functionality nearly identical.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G both come with a 21,200 mAh battery, offering ample power for extended usage. Neither model supports wireless charging or reverse wireless charging, but both support fast charging at a speed of 120W. Additionally, both phones come with a charger in the box and feature rechargeable batteries, though neither has a removable battery. Both devices also include a battery level indicator for monitoring remaining power.

There are no differences in battery-related features between the two devices. Both the Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Armor 29 Ultra 5G have the same battery power, fast charging capability, and overall charging specifications. The key battery functions such as charging speed, support for fast charging, and the inclusion of a charger in the box are identical in both models.

Overall, when it comes to battery specifications, the Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G are essentially the same, providing the same large battery capacity and similar charging capabilities.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G differ in their audio-related features. The Armor 29 Pro Thermal includes a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing users to connect wired headphones or other audio devices. In contrast, the Armor 29 Ultra 5G does not have a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users would need to rely on wireless audio solutions or adapters for wired connections.

Both models lack stereo speakers, so users may not experience enhanced audio quality from the built-in speakers. Additionally, neither device supports high-end Bluetooth audio technologies like aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, limiting the potential for premium wireless audio streaming.

Both devices do include a radio, offering a way to listen to FM radio, but the lack of stereo speakers and advanced audio technologies means that while radio functionality is available, the overall audio experience may be basic for both models.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G offer similar connectivity and features, with a few notable differences. Both models support 5G and feature dual SIM card slots. They also include USB Type-C, an external memory slot, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, and fingerprint scanners. Additionally, both phones are equipped with a gyroscope, GPS, compass, accelerometer, infrared sensor, and a barometer. They also support Galileo for navigation, and both have a cellular module.

One key difference between the two devices is their Wi-Fi capabilities. The Armor 29 Pro Thermal supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), while the Armor 29 Ultra 5G supports the same Wi-Fi standards but adds Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), which offers potential for faster and more efficient wireless connectivity in the future.

Other than the Wi-Fi difference, both phones share the same set of features, including a lack of HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, motion tracking, optical tracking, and a built-in projector. Neither model includes emergency SOS via satellite or crash detection, and both are not DLNA-certified. Overall, the connectivity and features are highly similar between the two devices, with the main distinction being the inclusion of Wi-Fi 7 in the Armor 29 Ultra 5G.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal and Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G are quite similar in terms of miscellaneous features. Both devices are equipped with a video light, which can be helpful for low-light photography or video recording. However, neither model features sapphire glass for the display, a curved display, or an e-paper display, meaning that both phones share the same display characteristics in this category.

In summary, there are no differences between the Armor 29 Pro Thermal and the Armor 29 Ultra 5G in the miscellaneous features group. Both models include a video light and have the same display technology without any of the advanced display options like sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper display.