Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G VS Xiaomi Poco F7

Both the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 are waterproof, offering an IP68 rating, which means they are resistant to dust and water immersion up to certain depths. The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G has a more rugged build, while the Poco F7 does not feature a rugged design.

In terms of size and weight, the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G is significantly bulkier, weighing 688 g, with a thickness of 33.8 mm, width of 85.6 mm, and a height of 177.3 mm. It has a much larger volume of 512.98 cm³. On the other hand, the Poco F7 is lighter, at 215.7 g, and much slimmer, with a thickness of 8.2 mm, a width of 77.9 mm, and a height of 163.1 mm, resulting in a much smaller volume of 104.19 cm³.

Neither device is foldable, meaning they both maintain a solid, non-folding form factor.

Both the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 feature OLED/AMOLED displays, providing vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The screen sizes differ, with the Armor 29 Ultra 5G sporting a 6.67″ display, while the Poco F7 has a slightly larger 6.83″ display. In terms of pixel density, the Poco F7 offers a sharper image with 447 ppi compared to the Armor 29 Ultra 5G’s 395 ppi.

The resolution on the Armor 29 Ultra 5G is 1080 x 2400 px, while the Poco F7 offers a higher resolution of 1280 x 2772 px, making the Poco F7’s display capable of finer detail. Both devices have a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and gaming experiences. However, the brightness is higher on the Armor 29 Ultra 5G at 900 nits compared to the Poco F7’s 700 nits.

When it comes to durability, both devices feature branded damage-resistant glass, but the Armor 29 Ultra 5G uses Gorilla Glass 3, whereas the Poco F7 is equipped with the newer Gorilla Glass 7i. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G does not support HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, while the Poco F7 supports all three of these technologies, offering enhanced video and image quality. Additionally, the Armor 29 Ultra 5G has a secondary screen, a feature absent in the Poco F7.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 both offer impressive performance specs, but there are notable differences in their configurations. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G is equipped with 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, while the Poco F7 provides 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM. Both devices have the same RAM speed of 4800 MHz, and they feature 4 nm semiconductor sizes with 64-bit support and DirectX 12 compatibility.

In terms of processing power, the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G uses the Mediatek Dimensity 9300 Plus chipset, with a CPU speed of 1 x 3.4 GHz, 3 x 2.85 GHz, and 4 x 2 GHz. The Poco F7 uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, with a slightly different CPU configuration of 3 x 3.01 GHz, 2 x 2.8 GHz, 2 x 2.02 GHz, and 1 x 3.21 GHz. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G scores higher on Geekbench 6 results, with a multi-core score of 7547 and a single-core score of 2302, compared to the Poco F7’s multi-core score of 6833 and single-core score of 2041.

Both devices have integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and support OpenGL ES version 3.2 and OpenCL version 2. Additionally, they both feature the big.LITTLE technology and have 8 CPU threads. However, the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G has a larger L2 cache of 8 MB compared to the Poco F7’s 6 MB, while the Poco F7 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to the Armor 29 Ultra 5G’s 18 MB. The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G supports a maximum memory of 24GB, but it does not support multithreading, unlike the Poco F7, which does support multithreading.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 both feature multi-lens main cameras. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G includes a 64 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP combination, while the Poco F7 has a 50 MP and 8 MP setup. Both devices offer wide apertures, with the Armor 29 Ultra 5G having 1.8 f, 1.9 f, and 2.2 f, while the Poco F7 has 2.2 f and 1.5 f. Both cameras also support phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus when recording movies, and have a flash, but the Armor 29 Ultra 5G uses a single flash LED, whereas the Poco F7 uses two LEDs.

In terms of video recording, the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G can record at 4320 x 30 fps, while the Poco F7 supports 2160 x 60 fps. Both devices offer slow-motion video recording and have built-in HDR modes. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G does not have optical image stabilization, while the Poco F7 does. Both cameras allow for manual exposure, ISO, and focus adjustments, but the Poco F7 also supports shooting in raw format, while the Armor 29 Ultra 5G does not.

Both devices have front cameras, with the Armor 29 Ultra 5G offering a 50 MP front camera with a 2.5 f aperture, while the Poco F7 provides a 20 MP front camera with a 2.2 f aperture. Neither device has a front-facing LED flash or a dual-lens front camera, and neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Both can create panoramas in-camera and have manual white balance settings. Additionally, both devices lack a 360° panorama feature, laser autofocus, and 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Both the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 run Android 15 and share a number of similar features. Both devices have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. Additionally, both offer theme customization, dark mode, and dynamic theming, as well as options for battery health check, media picker, and customizable notifications.

Both phones also have several user-friendly features like split screen support, PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode, full-page screenshots, and the ability to play games while downloading. They each offer offline voice recognition, voice commands, and track the current position of the device. Additionally, they support widgets, sharing intents, a child lock, and are free and open-source.

However, there are a few differences: the Armor 29 Ultra 5G does not have Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, or Quick Start, while the Poco F7 includes Wi-Fi password sharing but lacks focus modes and Quick Start. Both devices do not receive direct OS updates and do not support the ability to be used as a PC.

The Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 both come with rechargeable batteries, but they differ significantly in battery power. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G features an impressive 21200 mAh battery, while the Poco F7 has a smaller 6500 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, with the Armor 29 Ultra 5G offering a faster charging speed of 120W compared to the Poco F7's 90W. Additionally, the Armor 29 Ultra 5G comes with a charger in the box, while the Poco F7 does not.

Neither device supports wireless charging, and both have a battery level indicator to help monitor battery usage. Both phones have non-removable, rechargeable batteries.

Both the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G does not feature stereo speakers, while the Poco F7 does. The Poco F7 also supports several advanced Bluetooth audio technologies, including aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, whereas the Armor 29 Ultra 5G lacks support for these technologies, including aptX Lossless. Additionally, the Armor 29 Ultra 5G comes with a radio, a feature that is not available on the Poco F7.

In summary, while both devices are limited in terms of wired audio output with no 3.5 mm jack, the Poco F7 offers more robust wireless audio support, including stereo speakers and multiple Bluetooth audio codecs. On the other hand, the Armor 29 Ultra 5G offers the unique addition of a radio.

Both the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 support 5G and feature similar Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be). Both devices also support two SIM cards, have NFC, and feature USB Type-C ports, though the Armor 29 Ultra 5G has USB 3.2, while the Poco F7 supports USB 2.0. The Bluetooth version differs slightly, with the Armor 29 Ultra 5G supporting Bluetooth 5.4, while the Poco F7 supports Bluetooth 6.

In terms of download and upload speeds, the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G outperforms the Poco F7, offering a download speed of 10000 MBit/s and upload speed of 7000 MBit/s, compared to the Poco F7’s 4200 MBit/s download and 3500 MBit/s upload speeds. Both devices have fingerprint scanners, GPS, a compass, and various sensors like accelerometers, gyroscopes, and infrared sensors. The Armor 29 Ultra 5G includes a barometer, but the Poco F7 does not.

Both phones lack emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, and DLNA certification. Neither has a stylus or optical tracking, and neither supports 3D facial recognition or has a built-in projector. However, both support Galileo satellite positioning. Additionally, the Armor 29 Ultra 5G has an external memory slot, while the Poco F7 does not.

Both the Ulefone Armor 29 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F7 feature a video light, which can help improve low-light photography. Neither device includes sapphire glass displays, has a curved display, or offers an e-paper display. All these features are the same for both products.