Vivo iQOO Neo 10 VS Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro

The Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro both offer waterproof protection, with the Vivo model having an IP65 rating and the Xiaomi model featuring a more advanced IP68 rating. This indicates that the Xiaomi phone can withstand more rigorous exposure to water and dust compared to the Vivo device.

In terms of weight, the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 is lighter at 206 g, while the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro weighs slightly more at 219 g. Both phones have similar thickness, with the Vivo model measuring 8.1 mm thick and the Xiaomi model slightly thinner at 8 mm. The width and height of the two phones are also quite close, with the Vivo being 75.9 mm wide and 163.7 mm tall, compared to the Xiaomi's 77.9 mm width and 163.1 mm height.

The volume of the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 is 100.64 cm³, which is just a bit smaller than the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro's 101.64 cm³. Both phones do not feature a rugged build and are not foldable, so there is no significant difference in durability design between them.

Both the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Vivo iQOO Neo 10 has a screen size of 6.78″, while the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro comes in slightly larger at 6.83″. The pixel density of the Vivo model is 453 ppi, which is a bit higher than the Xiaomi's 447 ppi, though the difference may not be noticeable to the average user.

The resolution of the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 is 1260 x 2800 px, while the Xiaomi model has a resolution of 1280 x 2772 px. Both displays support HDR10 and HDR10+, offering improved dynamic range and color accuracy. Additionally, both phones feature an Always-On Display, ensuring users can view important information even when the screen is off.

The refresh rate of the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 is 144Hz, providing a smoother visual experience compared to the Xiaomi's 120Hz refresh rate. The Xiaomi model also supports Dolby Vision, a feature that the Vivo device lacks. Neither phone includes branded damage-resistant glass, has a secondary screen, nor supports touch input beyond the main display.

The Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro both feature the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, paired with the Adreno 825 GPU. Both phones have 16GB of RAM with a RAM speed of 4800 MHz, and they use the same 4nm semiconductor size. Their CPU configuration is also identical, with 8 threads and a clock speed of 3 x 3.01 GHz, 2 x 2.8 GHz, 2 x 2.02 GHz, and 1 x 3.21 GHz. The GPU clock speed for both models is 1150 MHz, and they each support multithreading and DirectX 12.

In terms of storage, the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 has 512GB of internal storage, while the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro offers a larger 1024GB. Both devices support a maximum of 24GB of RAM and have a similar eMMC version (5.1) and thermal design power (12.5W). Their maximum memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s, and both devices have identical L2 and L3 cache sizes, at 6 MB and 8 MB respectively.

The AnTuTu benchmark score for the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 is 2,135,100, while the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro achieves a slightly higher score of 2,406,698. Similarly, Geekbench 6 results show the Vivo model scoring 6833 (multi-core) and 2041 (single-core), while the Xiaomi model scores 6880 (multi-core) and 2154 (single-core). Both devices support OpenGL, OpenGL ES, and OpenCL, with identical versions (3.3, 3.2, and 2 respectively), as well as OpenVG 1.2. Neither phone supports a secondary display, and both have integrated LTE and graphics.

Both the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro feature dual-lens main cameras, each with a 50 MP and 8 MP setup. The Vivo iQOO Neo 10 has a wide aperture of f/2.2 for the main camera and f/1.8 for the secondary camera, while the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro's main camera has an f/2.2 aperture and its secondary lens has a wider f/1.5 aperture. Both phones support 2160p video recording at 60 fps and offer optical image stabilization for smoother video capture.

When it comes to the front camera, the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 sports a 32 MP front camera with a f/2.5 aperture, while the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro has a 20 MP front camera with a f/2.2 aperture. Both devices lack a front-facing LED flash but have a standard flash for their main cameras. Both phones also offer features like manual exposure, manual ISO, and manual white balance, along with autofocus capabilities for both photos and videos.

Both phones support slow-motion video recording, timelapse, and in-camera panorama creation. Neither device shoots raw images, supports HDR10 recording, or supports Dolby Vision recording. The Vivo iQOO Neo 10 has a single LED flash with 1 LED, while the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro has a dual-tone LED flash with 3 LEDs. Neither phone offers laser autofocus or 360° panorama shooting, and both have a CMOS sensor but do not feature a BSI sensor.

Both the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro run on Android 15, offering similar features in terms of privacy and customization. Both phones have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. They also share several functions, including theme customization, notification permissions, media picker, dark mode, battery health check, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, and customizable notifications. Both devices also support PiP (Picture-in-Picture) and Live Text, with full-page screenshots and the ability to play games while they download.

In terms of multitasking, both phones support split screen, offloading apps, widgets, and share intents. They also feature offline voice recognition and voice commands. Additionally, both devices allow for the tracking of the current position of the mobile device and support multi-user systems. However, neither phone has Quick Start functionality, and both lack Wi-Fi password sharing. Neither model supports focus modes, and neither gets direct OS updates.

Both devices are free and open-source, offering a similar user experience with features like a child lock and the ability to use manual settings like voice commands and privacy options. In terms of the Android system, there are no significant differences between the two products in this group.

The Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro both feature non-removable rechargeable batteries. The Vivo model has a 7000 mAh battery, while the Xiaomi model has a slightly larger 7550 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, with the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 offering a faster charging speed of 120W compared to the Xiaomi's 90W. Both phones come with a charger and include a battery level indicator.

Neither phone supports wireless charging, and both devices have rechargeable batteries, with no significant difference in this area. While the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 has a faster charging speed, the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro offers a slightly higher battery capacity. Both phones also lack removable batteries.

Both the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro do not feature a 3.5 mm audio jack. However, both phones are equipped with stereo speakers, providing a more immersive audio experience. The Vivo iQOO Neo 10 does not support any of the advanced Bluetooth audio codecs like aptX, LDAC, or aptX HD, while the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro supports aptX, allowing for higher-quality wireless audio transmission. Neither device includes support for aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, or LDAC, and neither has a built-in radio.

In summary, the two phones have similar audio setups, with both lacking a 3.5 mm jack but supporting stereo speakers. The key difference is that the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro includes aptX support, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 does not.

Both the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro offer 5G support, enabling fast mobile network connectivity. They both support Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 7, ensuring compatibility with various wireless standards. Each phone uses 2 SIM cards and features Bluetooth 5.4 for wireless connectivity. Both devices include a USB Type-C port with USB 2.0 support, NFC for contactless transactions, and a fingerprint scanner for biometric security. The download and upload speeds are identical at 4200 MBits/s and 3500 MBits/s, respectively.

In terms of sensors, both phones are equipped with a gyroscope, GPS, compass, infrared sensor, accelerometer, and a cellular module, ensuring a wide range of functionality for navigation, motion sensing, and more. Neither device includes a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, or a built-in projector. Both phones also support Galileo for satellite navigation. Additionally, neither phone has emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, motion tracking, or optical tracking capabilities.

Overall, the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro are highly similar in terms of connectivity and features, offering nearly identical specifications across the board. The key differences are that neither model stands out in any specific area within this category, as both offer the same connectivity options, sensors, and capabilities.

Both the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro are equipped with a video light, making them suitable for low-light video recording. Neither of the devices features sapphire glass for their display, a curved display, or an e-paper display. These specs are identical across both models, offering a similar set of additional features in this category.

In summary, the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro have the same functionality in terms of display features, with both devices lacking advanced glass protection or curved/e-paper displays but supporting video light for enhanced video capture.