Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro VS Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra

The Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra have noticeable differences in their design dimensions. The iQOO Pad weighs 635 g, while the Xiaomi Pad is lighter at 609 g. In terms of thickness, the iQOO Pad is 6.1 mm thick, compared to the Xiaomi Pad’s thinner 5.1 mm. The iQOO Pad also has slightly larger overall dimensions, measuring 289.6 mm in width and 198.3 mm in height, while the Xiaomi Pad is 305.8 mm wide and 207.5 mm tall, making it somewhat larger in terms of surface area. The iQOO Pad’s volume is 350.3 cm³, while the Xiaomi Pad’s volume is 323.6 cm³, reflecting the difference in overall size.

When it comes to functionality, the iQOO Pad is water resistant, while the Xiaomi Pad does not feature any water resistance. Neither tablet includes a stylus, nor do they support tilt sensitivity. However, the Xiaomi Pad does support a detachable keyboard, while the iQOO Pad does not. Both products lack a backlit keyboard.

Overall, the key differences in design come down to the size, weight, and water resistance, with the Xiaomi Pad offering a detachable keyboard and being slightly smaller and lighter, while the iQOO Pad stands out for its water resistance.

The Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra differ significantly in their display specifications. The iQOO Pad has a 13″ screen, while the Xiaomi Pad features a larger 14″ display. In terms of resolution, the iQOO Pad offers 3096 x 2064 px, compared to the Xiaomi Pad's higher resolution of 3200 x 2136 px. As a result, the Xiaomi Pad has a slightly sharper display with a pixel density of 275 ppi, whereas the iQOO Pad has a pixel density of 286 ppi, which is marginally higher.

The iQOO Pad uses an LCD, IPS display type, while the Xiaomi Pad boasts an OLED/AMOLED display, which typically offers better contrast and deeper blacks. The iQOO Pad has a refresh rate of 144Hz and a touch sampling rate of 144Hz, while the Xiaomi Pad has a refresh rate of 120Hz but a higher touch sampling rate of 240Hz, which may provide a more responsive touch experience.

Both devices support HDR10, but the iQOO Pad does not support Dolby Vision, while the Xiaomi Pad includes Dolby Vision for enhanced dynamic range. The iQOO Pad does not have branded damage-resistant glass, whereas the Xiaomi Pad does. Neither product has sapphire glass or an e-paper display.

The Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra have some key differences in performance specifications. The iQOO Pad comes with 512GB of internal storage, while the Xiaomi Pad offers a larger 1024GB. Both tablets feature 16GB of RAM. The iQOO Pad is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus chipset, while the Xiaomi Pad uses the Xring O1 chipset. The CPU configurations also differ; the iQOO Pad’s CPU has 8 threads with speeds of 3.73 GHz (1 core), 3.3 GHz (4 cores), and 2.4 GHz (3 cores), whereas the Xiaomi Pad’s CPU has 10 threads with speeds of 3.4 GHz (4 cores), 1.89 GHz (2 cores), 1.8 GHz (2 cores), and 3.9 GHz (2 cores).

The Geekbench 6 results show that the iQOO Pad has a higher multi-core score of 8969 compared to the Xiaomi Pad’s 8125, and a slightly higher single-core score of 2874, compared to the Xiaomi Pad’s 2709. Both products use a 3 nm semiconductor size, support 64-bit, and have integrated LTE. The iQOO Pad’s GPU is the Immortalis G925, with a clock speed of 1300 MHz, while the Xiaomi Pad also uses the Immortalis-G925 but with a higher GPU clock speed of 1612 MHz. The iQOO Pad has a maximum memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s, which is higher than the Xiaomi Pad’s 76.8 GB/s.

Additional differences include the RAM speed, with the iQOO Pad’s RAM operating at 10667 MHz, while the Xiaomi Pad’s RAM is faster at 4800 MHz. The iQOO Pad supports a maximum of 24GB of memory, whereas the Xiaomi Pad supports a maximum of 16GB. The iQOO Pad does not support ECC memory, while the Xiaomi Pad does. Both tablets run Android 15 and use HMP (heterogeneous multi-processing).

The Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra have notable differences in their camera specifications. The iQOO Pad has a 13 MP main camera and an 8 MP front camera, while the Xiaomi Pad offers a significantly higher 50 MP main camera and a 32 MP front camera. Both tablets are capable of video recording at 2160 x 30 fps, but the Xiaomi Pad can record at 60 fps in the same resolution, offering a smoother video capture experience. Both devices support HDR, have touch autofocus, and offer continuous autofocus during video recording.

Neither device supports features like panoramic photo creation, 360° panorama, or 3D photo/video recording. Both devices have a single flash LED, but neither includes a front-facing LED flash. Both tablets also lack built-in optical image stabilization and support for Dolby Vision recording. In terms of manual controls, both the iQOO Pad and Xiaomi Pad allow manual adjustments for ISO, white balance, exposure, and focus, but neither offers manual shutter speed adjustments.

While both tablets share several common features such as CMOS sensors and video lights, the Xiaomi Pad’s higher camera megapixels and enhanced video recording capabilities make it more suited for those seeking better overall camera performance.

Both the Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra offer stereo speakers, ensuring a solid audio experience. However, the audio features differ in terms of wireless audio codec support. The iQOO Pad does not support any aptX codecs, including aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Low Latency, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Pad supports aptX HD and LDAC, which are both high-quality wireless audio standards for improved sound quality over Bluetooth.

Neither tablet has a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless audio or USB-C for wired connections. Both tablets also lack a built-in radio.

Overall, the Xiaomi Pad offers more advanced wireless audio support, particularly with aptX HD and LDAC, while both tablets share stereo speakers and the absence of a 3.5 mm audio jack.

Both the Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra come with large batteries, but there are slight differences in their capacities. The iQOO Pad features a 12050 mAh battery, while the Xiaomi Pad has a slightly smaller 12000 mAh battery. Both tablets support fast charging and have rechargeable batteries, but neither supports wireless charging. Both devices also include a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily check the remaining charge. Neither tablet has a removable battery.

In summary, the main difference between the two in terms of battery is the very slight difference in battery power, with the iQOO Pad offering a marginally higher capacity. Other features, including fast charging, battery level indicator, and non-removable battery, are identical across both devices.

The Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra are quite similar when it comes to connectivity and features. Both tablets support the same Wi-Fi versions (Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 7) and offer Bluetooth 5.4. They both lack support for cellular modules and 5G, and neither has an HDMI output, NFC, or an infrared sensor. Both devices also have USB Type-C ports with USB 3.2 support, along with the ability to track the current position of a mobile device.

On the software side, both tablets share a range of privacy and usability features, including Mail Privacy Protection, on-device machine learning, clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. Neither tablet supports cross-site tracking blocking. Both tablets also support split screen, Live Text, full-page screenshots, PiP, dynamic theming, dark mode, battery health checks, and offline voice recognition. Additionally, both support a multi-user system and have child locks, but neither offers Quick Start or focus modes.

The Xiaomi Pad adds a few extra features, including NFC, a fingerprint scanner, and a compass, which the iQOO Pad lacks. Both devices include gyroscopes, accelerometers, and voice commands, and both are free and open source. The iQOO Pad, however, does not have a compass or a fingerprint scanner, and it lacks support for NFC.

The Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra are identical in terms of their miscellaneous specifications. Both tablets feature DDR memory version 5 and support multithreading. This means that both devices can handle multitasking efficiently, allowing for smooth performance when running multiple applications simultaneously. There are no differences between the two products in this category.

In summary, both tablets offer the same memory version and multithreading capabilities, ensuring similar performance in these areas.