Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro VS Vivo iQOO Z10x

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z10x are similar in many aspects of their design but have a few key differences. Both phones are water-resistant, with the Z10 Turbo Pro having an IP65 rating, meaning it's resistant to dust and can withstand water splashes. In comparison, the Z10x has a higher IP68 rating, making it fully waterproof and able to withstand submersion in water for extended periods.

When it comes to size, the two devices are quite close. The Z10 Turbo Pro weighs 206 grams, just slightly heavier than the Z10x at 204 grams. Both devices have the same thickness of 8.1 mm, but the Z10x is marginally taller (165.7 mm vs 163.7 mm) and slightly wider (76.3 mm vs 75.9 mm). These differences result in the Z10x having a slightly larger volume (102.4 cm³ vs 100.64 cm³), though the variation is minimal.

Both devices do not have a rugged build, and neither is foldable, ensuring they follow a more traditional smartphone design. Overall, while both phones offer similar design attributes, the Z10x provides a bit more water protection, while the Z10 Turbo Pro has a slightly smaller profile in terms of height and width.

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10x feature different types of displays that set them apart. The Z10 Turbo Pro comes with an OLED/AMOLED display, while the Z10x uses an LCD, IPS panel. OLED/AMOLED displays typically offer deeper blacks and more vibrant colors compared to LCDs, though both types support touch functionality, as confirmed for both models.

When it comes to screen size, the Z10 Turbo Pro has a 6.78″ display, slightly larger than the Z10x's 6.72″ screen. The Turbo Pro also has a higher pixel density of 453 ppi, compared to the Z10x's 393 ppi, offering potentially sharper details. The resolution of the Turbo Pro is also higher, with 1260 x 2800 px, while the Z10x offers a resolution of 1080 x 2408 px. This results in the Z10 Turbo Pro having a denser, crisper display.

Both devices support a refresh rate of 120Hz or higher, with the Z10 Turbo Pro boasting a 144Hz refresh rate, which is notably higher than the Z10x's 120Hz. Both phones feature an Always-On Display, but neither supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision. Neither device has branded damage-resistant glass or a secondary screen, further aligning their displays in key aspects.

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10x differ significantly in terms of performance specifications. The Z10 Turbo Pro is equipped with 512GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, while the Z10x comes with 256GB of storage and 8GB of RAM. This means the Z10 Turbo Pro offers more space for apps and files, along with double the RAM capacity for multitasking and performance-heavy tasks.

In terms of processing power, the Z10 Turbo Pro features a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, paired with an Adreno 825 GPU. The CPU configuration is a combination of 3 x 3.01 GHz, 2 x 2.8 GHz, 2 x 2.02 GHz, and 1 x 3.21 GHz cores. On the other hand, the Z10x is powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 7300 chipset with a Mali G615 MC2 GPU. Its CPU speed is distributed across 4 x 2.5 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz cores. Both phones have integrated LTE, and both support 64-bit processing and DirectX 12, but the Z10 Turbo Pro's chipset is more powerful, as reflected in its higher Geekbench 6 multi-core result (6833 vs 2932) and single-core score (2041 vs 1026).

Additional details include the Z10 Turbo Pro’s slightly faster GPU clock speed (1150 MHz vs 1047 MHz) and higher RAM speed of 4800 MHz compared to the Z10x’s 6400 MHz. The Z10 Turbo Pro can support up to 24GB of RAM, whereas the Z10x is limited to 16GB. Both devices use a 4nm semiconductor and have integrated graphics. Notably, both phones also use big.LITTLE technology and have 8 CPU threads, offering efficient task management.

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10x both feature dual-lens main cameras, but they differ in megapixel count and other capabilities. The Z10 Turbo Pro's main camera has a 50MP primary sensor and an 8MP secondary lens, while the Z10x has a 50MP primary lens paired with a 2MP secondary camera. Both phones have a wide aperture of f/1.8 for the secondary lens, though the main camera has a slightly wider f/2.2 on the Turbo Pro compared to f/2.4 on the Z10x.

When it comes to video recording, the Z10 Turbo Pro supports 4K video at 60 fps (2160 x 60 fps), while the Z10x is limited to 30 fps (2160 x 30 fps). Both devices offer features like continuous autofocus during video recording, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and slow-motion video recording. The Z10 Turbo Pro includes optical image stabilization, while the Z10x lacks this feature.

For the front camera, the Z10 Turbo Pro has a 16MP sensor with a f/2.5 wide aperture, while the Z10x features a lower 8MP front camera with a f/2.0 aperture. Both devices can create panoramas in-camera and support timelapse functions. Neither phone includes a front-facing LED flash or a dual-lens front camera, and both lack advanced features like HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Overall, the Z10 Turbo Pro offers a higher megapixel front camera and better video capabilities, while the Z10x focuses on solid, reliable camera performance at a lower spec level.

Both the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10x run on Android 15, offering a similar set of software features. They both include clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, and on-device machine learning. Additionally, both devices support theme customization, blocking app tracking, dynamic theming, and customizable notifications. They also feature dark mode, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and full-page screenshots, providing a consistent software experience.

There are some specific features that are common across both models, such as support for widgets, offline voice recognition, voice commands, tracking the current position of the device, and multi-user system support. However, neither device gets direct OS updates, and neither includes Quick Start functionality. Both phones also lack Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, and battery health check options, ensuring that their software environments are similarly equipped.

Some software differences do exist, such as the Turbo Pro's ability to offload apps, which is not mentioned for the Z10x. Both phones support a media picker, notification permissions, and split-screen functionality, but neither device supports Mail Privacy Protection or cross-site tracking blocking. Overall, the software experience on both devices is quite similar, with just a few small variations in features like app offloading.

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10x have slightly different battery specifications. The Z10 Turbo Pro is equipped with a larger 7000 mAh battery, while the Z10x comes with a 6500 mAh battery. Both devices feature non-removable, rechargeable batteries and include a battery level indicator, but neither supports wireless charging.

In terms of charging speed, the Z10 Turbo Pro supports faster charging at 120W, significantly outpacing the Z10x, which supports 44W fast charging. Both devices do support fast charging, but the Z10 Turbo Pro's much higher charging speed allows for a quicker recharge.

Overall, the Z10 Turbo Pro has a larger battery and much faster charging capabilities compared to the Z10x, though both offer the same essential features like battery level indicators and rechargeable, non-removable batteries.

In terms of audio, both the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10x lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning neither supports wired headphones or audio accessories through this port. However, the Z10 Turbo Pro is equipped with stereo speakers, while the Z10x only has mono speakers. This gives the Turbo Pro a more immersive audio experience for media playback and gaming.

When it comes to wireless audio features, the Z10 Turbo Pro stands out with support for aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless. These features provide improved audio quality over Bluetooth connections, especially when paired with compatible audio devices. In contrast, the Z10x does not support any of these advanced Bluetooth audio technologies, offering a more basic wireless audio experience.

Neither device has a radio, and both lack LDAC support for high-resolution audio streaming. Overall, the Z10 Turbo Pro offers a more robust audio feature set, particularly for Bluetooth audio, while the Z10x focuses on basic audio capabilities.

Both the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10x support 5G, allowing for fast mobile data connections. The Turbo Pro supports more advanced Wi-Fi versions, including Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 7, while the Z10x is limited to Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 6. This gives the Turbo Pro an advantage in terms of future-proofing its Wi-Fi capabilities. Both phones have dual SIM support and USB Type-C, but the Turbo Pro supports Bluetooth 6, while the Z10x supports Bluetooth 5.4, which may imply slight differences in Bluetooth performance.

Regarding connectivity features, the Z10 Turbo Pro offers faster download speeds of 4200 MBits/s compared to the Z10x’s 3270 MBits/s, while both have similar upload speeds (3500 MBits/s for the Turbo Pro and 3270 MBits/s for the Z10x). The Turbo Pro also includes NFC, which the Z10x lacks. Other than that, both devices come with features like GPS, a compass, a fingerprint scanner, accelerometer, and gyroscope. The Turbo Pro additionally has an infrared sensor, but this is absent from the Z10x.

Neither device supports features like 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, or a stylus, and both lack a barometer, HDMI output, motion tracking, optical tracking, and a built-in projector. Both devices also support Galileo satellite navigation. Overall, the Z10 Turbo Pro offers more advanced connectivity options and some extra features like NFC and an infrared sensor, whereas the Z10x offers a more basic connectivity package.

Both the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10x come equipped with a video light, allowing for enhanced lighting during video recording. Neither phone features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning their display technology is more traditional in terms of materials and form factor.

Overall, the specifications in this group are identical for both devices, with no notable differences between them in terms of video light functionality or display characteristics.