Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo VS Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro have very similar designs. Both phones are water-resistant, offering an IP65 rating, which ensures protection against dust and low-pressure water jets. The dimensions of both devices are identical, with each having a height of 163.7 mm, a width of 75.9 mm, and a volume of 100.64 cm³.

When it comes to weight, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo weighs 212 g, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is slightly lighter at 206 g, giving the latter a minor edge in terms of portability. Both phones are 8.1 mm thick, which means they share the same slim profile.

Neither model features a rugged build, nor can they be folded, indicating a more conventional design without additional durability features like some other models. Overall, the design specifications of both phones are nearly identical, with only a slight difference in weight.

The display specifications of the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro are identical. Both models feature a 6.78-inch OLED/AMOLED display with a resolution of 1260 x 2800 px and a pixel density of 453 ppi. This provides sharp, vibrant visuals and a smooth viewing experience.

Both phones offer a 144Hz refresh rate for fluid motion and a brightness of 2000 nits (typical), ensuring clear visibility even in bright lighting conditions. Additionally, they both support an Always-On Display, which keeps important information visible even when the screen is off.

Neither phone has branded damage-resistant glass, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or a secondary screen, and both models come with a touch screen. The display features are effectively the same for both devices, with no differences between them in this category.

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro share several similarities in their performance specs but differ in key areas. Both models come with 512GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, ensuring ample space and smooth multitasking. The CPUs on both devices are octa-core, with the Z10 Turbo featuring a MediaTek Dimensity 8400 chipset and the Z10 Turbo Pro using the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset. The Z10 Turbo's CPU speed is 1 x 3.25 GHz, 3 x 3 GHz, and 4 x 2.15 GHz, while the Z10 Turbo Pro has a CPU speed of 3 x 3.01 GHz, 2 x 2.8 GHz, 2 x 2.02 GHz, and 1 x 3.21 GHz, showing a slight variation in the configuration.

In terms of benchmark scores, the Z10 Turbo scores 1,864,199 on AnTuTu and 6,033 in Geekbench 6's multi-core test, while the Z10 Turbo Pro has a higher AnTuTu score of 2,405,000 and a multi-core Geekbench score of 6,833, indicating a notable performance gap between the two. The Z10 Turbo has a Mali G720 MC7 GPU with a clock speed of 1300 MHz, while the Z10 Turbo Pro features an Adreno 825 GPU running at 1150 MHz. Although the GPU clock speed is higher on the Z10 Turbo, the overall GPU architecture and performance may still differ.

Other performance aspects such as RAM speed are slightly faster on the Z10 Turbo Pro (4800 MHz) compared to the Z10 Turbo's 4267 MHz, and the Pro model also has slightly higher memory bandwidth at 76.8 GB/s compared to the Turbo's 68.2 GB/s. Both devices have integrated graphics, use big.LITTLE technology, and support 64-bit architecture. Cache sizes are also larger on the Z10 Turbo Pro, with 6 MB of L2 cache and 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to the Z10 Turbo’s 1 MB of L2 cache and 6 MB of L3 cache. Both phones support up to 24GB of RAM, but neither exceeds the 16GB that is currently installed.

The camera setups on the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro share several key features, but there are some differences in the main camera specs. Both phones feature a dual-lens main camera setup with a 50 MP lens, but the Z10 Turbo has a 2 MP secondary camera, while the Z10 Turbo Pro uses an 8 MP secondary camera. Both phones have a wide aperture of 2.4f for the main lens and 1.8f for the secondary lens, although the Z10 Turbo Pro has a slightly smaller aperture of 2.2f for the main camera.

When it comes to video recording, the Z10 Turbo can record at 2160p at 30 fps, while the Z10 Turbo Pro supports 2160p at 60 fps, providing smoother high-definition video. Both phones offer a wide range of features, including continuous autofocus during video recording, phase-detection autofocus for photos, manual exposure and ISO controls, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. They also both have a front camera with a 16 MP resolution and a wide aperture of 2.5f.

Neither phone includes a front-facing LED flash, dual-tone LED flash for the main camera, or a BSI sensor. Other features such as HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, 3D photo/video recording, and a front-facing camera under the display are also absent on both models. Overall, the primary difference between these two devices lies in the secondary camera resolution and video recording capabilities, with the Z10 Turbo Pro offering more advanced features in these areas.

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro run the same version of Android—Android 15—and share many similar software features. Both phones include clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, and support for theme customization. They can block app tracking and use on-device machine learning, and both have notification and media picker options, customizable notifications, and the ability to play games while they download. Other features like dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health check, and an extra dim mode are also present on both devices.

Neither phone has Mail Privacy Protection, focus modes, or Quick Start. Both devices support split-screen multitasking, picture-in-picture (PiP) mode, full-page screenshots, and dynamic theming. They also have features like Live Text, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the ability to track the current position of a mobile device. Both phones are also multi-user systems, support widgets, and offer sharing intents.

One notable similarity is that neither device gets direct OS updates. Additionally, both phones support child locks and are free and open-source. There are no significant differences between the two models in terms of operating system features, with both offering the same set of software tools and privacy settings.

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro both feature large, rechargeable batteries, but there are some differences in their capacities and charging speeds. The Z10 Turbo has a 7620 mAh battery, while the Z10 Turbo Pro has a slightly smaller 7000 mAh battery. Both phones do not support wireless charging, but they both offer fast charging capabilities. The Z10 Turbo supports a charging speed of 90W, while the Z10 Turbo Pro offers a faster 120W charging speed.

Both phones have non-removable batteries, a battery level indicator, and are equipped with rechargeable batteries. The Z10 Turbo and Z10 Turbo Pro share the same feature set in terms of battery management, with no significant differences in terms of battery features beyond the capacity and charging speed.

Overall, the Z10 Turbo has a larger battery capacity, while the Z10 Turbo Pro supports faster charging. Both devices have similar features, including fast charging support, battery indicators, and rechargeable batteries.

The audio features of the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro are quite similar but with a few differences. Both phones lack a 3.5 mm audio jack and come with stereo speakers for an enhanced sound experience. They both support aptX and aptX HD for high-quality Bluetooth audio, ensuring good sound performance when using compatible wireless headphones or speakers.

The Z10 Turbo Pro, however, offers a few additional audio features compared to the Z10 Turbo. It supports aptX Adaptive and aptX Lossless, which can provide a more flexible and higher quality Bluetooth audio experience. In contrast, the Z10 Turbo does not support these features, limiting its Bluetooth audio capabilities to aptX and aptX HD.

Neither phone includes a radio, and both lack support for LDAC, meaning neither supports high-resolution audio streaming over Bluetooth. The overall audio capabilities are similar, but the Z10 Turbo Pro offers a more advanced set of Bluetooth audio features.

The connectivity and feature specifications of the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro are largely similar, with some differences in Wi-Fi support and NFC capability. Both devices support 5G, have dual SIM card slots, and feature USB Type-C ports with USB 2.0. They both have a fingerprint scanner, GPS, a compass, and several sensors like an accelerometer, gyroscope, and infrared sensor. Neither device includes a barometer, HDMI output, stylus, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner.

In terms of Wi-Fi, both phones support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), but the Z10 Turbo Pro stands out with added support for Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), offering more advanced connectivity options. The Z10 Turbo lacks NFC support, whereas the Z10 Turbo Pro includes NFC, providing better compatibility with contactless payments and other NFC features.

The Z10 Turbo supports a download speed of 5170 MBits/s, while the Z10 Turbo Pro is slightly lower at 4200 MBits/s. Both phones share many of the same features like emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, and DLNA certification, though neither includes these functions. Both devices are also equipped with Galileo support for navigation and have a cellular module for mobile connectivity, ensuring solid performance across various features.

Both the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro feature a video light, enhancing their ability to record or take photos in low-light environments. However, neither phone comes with sapphire glass for the display, nor do they feature a curved display or an e-paper display. These specifications are identical across both devices, meaning there is no difference in terms of additional display technologies or glass protection between the two models.

Overall, the Z10 Turbo and Z10 Turbo Pro are very similar in the miscellaneous features category, with both phones offering a video light and lacking any advanced display technologies like sapphire glass or curved/e-paper screens.