Vivo Pad 5 VS Vivo Pad 5 Pro

The Vivo Pad 5 and Vivo Pad 5 Pro are quite similar in terms of design, with both tablets having identical thicknesses at 6.6 mm. However, there are noticeable differences in size and weight. The Vivo Pad 5 weighs 590 g, while the Vivo Pad 5 Pro is slightly heavier at 635 g. In terms of dimensions, the Pad 5 has a width of 266.4 mm and a height of 192 mm, while the Pad 5 Pro is larger, measuring 289.6 mm in width and 198.3 mm in height.

Another design difference lies in the volume of each tablet. The Vivo Pad 5 has a volume of 337.58208 cm³, while the Pad 5 Pro is larger with a volume of 379.022688 cm³. This difference in size and weight reflects the overall larger build of the Pad 5 Pro compared to the Pad 5.

Both tablets do not include a stylus, detachable keyboard, or a backlit keyboard, and neither supports tilt sensitivity. The Vivo Pad 5 is water-resistant, while the Vivo Pad 5 Pro lacks water resistance.

The Vivo Pad 5 and Vivo Pad 5 Pro display some differences in key areas. The Vivo Pad 5 has a 12.1″ screen, while the Vivo Pad 5 Pro features a slightly larger 13″ display. The resolution of the Pad 5 is 2800 x 1968 px, offering a pixel density of 283 ppi, whereas the Pad 5 Pro has a higher resolution of 3096 x 2064 px and a slightly higher pixel density of 286 ppi.

Both tablets feature an LCD, IPS display type and support HDR10. The refresh rate and touch sampling rate are notable differences: the Vivo Pad 5 supports a 144Hz refresh rate and a 144Hz touch sampling rate, while the Vivo Pad 5 Pro offers the same 144Hz refresh rate but a much higher touch sampling rate of 480Hz.

Neither tablet includes branded damage-resistant glass or sapphire glass, and neither supports HDR10+ or Dolby Vision. Both devices have a touchscreen and do not feature an e-paper display.

Both the Vivo Pad 5 and Vivo Pad 5 Pro come with 512GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, ensuring ample space and memory for most users. The main difference between the two lies in their chipsets: the Pad 5 uses the Mediatek Dimensity 9300 Plus, while the Pad 5 Pro is equipped with the more advanced MediaTek Dimensity 9400. The Pad 5's chipset operates at CPU speeds of 1 x 3.4 GHz, 3 x 2.85 GHz, and 4 x 2 GHz, whereas the Pad 5 Pro has slightly faster CPU speeds of 1 x 3.63 GHz, 4 x 3.3 GHz, and 3 x 2.4 GHz.

In terms of performance, the Pad 5 scores 7547 in Geekbench 6’s multi-core test and 2302 in the single-core test, while the Pad 5 Pro achieves higher scores of 8969 (multi-core) and 2874 (single-core), indicating a noticeable difference in raw processing power.

Other specifications like the GPU are similar for both models, with both using GPUs clocked at 1300 MHz. However, the Pad 5 Pro has a smaller L3 cache (12 MB) compared to the Pad 5's 18 MB. Both devices run on Android 15 and support 64-bit, with HMP (Heterogeneous Multi-Processing) and integrated LTE. The Pad 5 Pro's semiconductor is built on a smaller 3 nm process, while the Pad 5 uses a 4 nm process. RAM speeds also differ, with the Pad 5 having 4800 MHz RAM and the Pad 5 Pro boasting faster 10667 MHz RAM. Both tablets have a maximum memory amount of 24GB.

The Vivo Pad 5 and Vivo Pad 5 Pro both feature cameras with various similar attributes but also notable differences. The main camera on the Vivo Pad 5 has a resolution of 8 MP, while the Pad 5 Pro offers a significantly higher 13 MP main camera. The front camera on the Pad 5 is 5 MP, while the Pad 5 Pro has an 8 MP front camera.

Both devices can record video at 1080 x 30 fps, but the Pad 5 Pro can record at a higher resolution of 2160 x 30 fps on its main camera. Both tablets include a flash, touch autofocus, and a video light, but neither supports HDR10 recording or 360° panorama shooting. The front camera lacks a flash on both models.

Additional features like manual white balance, manual ISO, manual focus, and manual exposure are available on both devices. Both tablets lack a BSI sensor, continuous autofocus during video recording, optical image stabilization, and support for 3D photo/video recording. The Pad 5 has a CMOS sensor, while the Pad 5 Pro uses a non-CMOS sensor. Both also support slow-motion video recording, but the Pad 5 Pro includes that feature, while the Pad 5 does not list it explicitly.

Both the Vivo Pad 5 and Vivo Pad 5 Pro share the same audio features in several key areas. Neither tablet supports any advanced Bluetooth audio codecs like aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Low Latency, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. Both tablets come with stereo speakers, ensuring a richer audio experience compared to mono speakers.

Neither the Pad 5 nor the Pad 5 Pro includes a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on Bluetooth or USB-C audio solutions. Additionally, neither device includes a radio feature.

In summary, the audio capabilities are very similar across both models, with both featuring stereo speakers but lacking advanced Bluetooth codec support, a 3.5 mm jack, and a radio function.

The Vivo Pad 5 and Vivo Pad 5 Pro differ slightly in battery specifications. The Pad 5 has a 10000 mAh battery, while the Pad 5 Pro features a larger 12050 mAh battery. Both devices support rechargeable batteries, but neither has a removable battery. Both models also include a battery level indicator to keep users informed of their battery status.

One key difference between the two tablets is that the Vivo Pad 5 supports fast charging, while the Pad 5 Pro does not. Neither device supports wireless charging.

In summary, the Pad 5 Pro has a slightly larger battery capacity, but the Pad 5 has the advantage of supporting fast charging. Both devices share other features like having rechargeable batteries and a battery level indicator, but neither offers wireless charging or a removable battery.

The Vivo Pad 5 and Vivo Pad 5 Pro share many features in terms of connectivity and software, with both devices supporting on-device machine learning, clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, and app tracking blocking. Both tablets also support split screen, Live Text, notification permissions, full-page screenshots, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode, alongside theme customization and dark mode.

Both models have USB Type-C ports with USB version 3.2, support for Bluetooth 5.4, and include a gyroscope and accelerometer. They also feature voice commands, customizable notifications, sharing intents, and offline voice recognition. Neither tablet has a 3D facial recognition system, an iris scanner, or a built-in projector. Additionally, neither device supports Ethernet or has an infrared sensor.

There are a few differences between the two tablets. The Vivo Pad 5 lacks a compass, while the Vivo Pad 5 Pro includes one. Additionally, the Pad 5 includes features like focus modes and Wi-Fi password sharing, but the Pad 5 Pro does not list these. Both tablets support multi-user systems, track the current position of a mobile device, and have child lock functionality. Neither model has NFC, HDMI output, or cellular/5G capabilities, and neither provides direct OS updates.

The Vivo Pad 5 and Vivo Pad 5 Pro both use DDR memory version 5, ensuring fast and efficient memory performance. However, there is a notable difference in their handling of multithreading. The Vivo Pad 5 does not use multithreading, while the Vivo Pad 5 Pro supports it. This indicates that the Pad 5 Pro can handle multiple tasks or threads simultaneously, which may improve performance in certain multi-tasking scenarios.

In summary, both tablets have the same memory version, but the Vivo Pad 5 Pro's support for multithreading gives it an advantage in terms of processing multiple tasks efficiently.