Vivo T4 Pro VS Vivo V60

In terms of design, the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 are identical across every measurable dimension. Both phones share the exact same 163.5 × 77 × 7.5 mm footprint, an identical 192 g weight, and the same calculated volume of 94.42 cm³. In practice, this means picking up either device will feel indistinguishable in the hand — same slim profile, same balance, same one-handed reach.

On durability, both models are rated IP68 with a waterproof depth of 1.5 m, placing them on equal footing for everyday water resistance — safe for rain, splashes, and brief submersion. Neither carries a rugged build certification nor a foldable form factor, so both target the same conventional, slim-slab audience.

This group is a complete tie. There is no design-based reason to prefer one over the other — every spec in this category is a perfect match. The decision between these two phones will need to rest entirely on other feature groups such as performance, camera, or display.

Both the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 feature a 6.77″ AMOLED panel with a 1080 × 2392 resolution, 388 ppi pixel density, and a 120Hz refresh rate. For everyday use, this translates to sharp, vibrant visuals and fluid scrolling — the kind of display quality that comfortably sits above mid-range expectations. Both also include branded damage-resistant glass and touch support, so durability and responsiveness are equally matched.

The one meaningful split between these two screens is HDR support. The T4 Pro supports both HDR10 and HDR10+, while the V60 supports neither. In practice, HDR10+ enables dynamic tone-mapping on compatible streaming content — meaning brighter highlights and deeper shadows that adjust scene by scene rather than being locked to a static profile. For users who frequently watch HDR content on platforms like Netflix or Amazon Prime, this is a tangible, visible difference.

The Vivo T4 Pro holds a clear edge in this category, entirely due to its HDR10 and HDR10+ support. The underlying panel hardware is identical, but the T4 Pro unlocks a richer viewing experience for multimedia consumption that the V60 simply cannot match.

Under the hood, both phones run on the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chip — a modern 4nm processor with an identical CPU configuration, 1000 MHz GPU clock, and DDR5 memory at 4200 MHz. For raw processing power, graphics performance, and day-to-day responsiveness, these two devices will perform indistinguishably. Tasks like app switching, gaming, and video playback draw from the exact same silicon foundation.

Where the two diverge is in memory and storage provisioning. The Vivo V60 ships with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of internal storage, compared to the T4 Pro's 12GB RAM and 256GB storage. The extra RAM gives the V60 more headroom to keep background apps alive simultaneously — a practical benefit for power users who multitask heavily or run demanding applications. The doubled storage, meanwhile, is significant for users who accumulate large media libraries, offline content, or extensive app collections without relying on cloud backup.

The Vivo V60 takes a clear advantage here. The processor parity means neither phone outpaces the other in speed, but the V60's superior RAM and storage configuration makes it the more future-proof and capacity-generous option of the two.

The main camera systems share a strong foundation — both phones offer a triple-lens rear setup with a 50MP primary shooter, OIS, 3x optical zoom, phase-detection autofocus, and 4K/30fps video. However, the tertiary lens tells a different story: the T4 Pro's third sensor is a modest 2MP / f2.4 unit, while the V60 fields an 8MP / f2.0 lens — a substantially more capable module that captures more detail and lets in more light. Additionally, the V60's minimum focal length extends to 15mm versus the T4 Pro's 26mm, meaning the V60 can capture noticeably wider-angle shots — a meaningful advantage for architecture, landscapes, and confined spaces.

The selfie camera gap is even more pronounced. The Vivo V60 pairs a 50MP front camera with a wider f/2.2 aperture, while the T4 Pro offers a 32MP / f2.5 shooter. For users who prioritize portrait selfies or front-facing video calls in lower light, the V60's combination of higher resolution and brighter aperture is a genuine advantage. The V60 also sports 4 flash LEDs on the rear compared to just 1 on the T4 Pro, which can improve flash-lit photo consistency and coverage.

Across nearly every camera dimension that diverges, the Vivo V60 comes out ahead — stronger tertiary lens, wider field of view, a far superior front camera, and better flash hardware. It is the clear winner for photography-focused buyers.

Running Android 15, both the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 arrive with an identical software feature set. Key productivity capabilities like split-screen multitasking, Picture-in-Picture, widgets, and app offloading are present on both, as is a solid suite of privacy controls — including location options, camera/microphone permissions, and app tracking blockers. For the vast majority of users, the day-to-day software experience will be entirely interchangeable.

On the privacy front, both phones share the same strengths and the same gaps: neither offers cross-site tracking protection nor Mail Privacy Protection, and neither receives direct OS updates — meaning software patches are routed through Vivo's own update pipeline rather than coming straight from Google. This is worth noting for security-conscious buyers, as it can introduce delays in receiving critical updates.

This category is an absolute tie. Every single software specification listed is identical across both devices. The operating system offers no basis for choosing one over the other, and buyers should focus their decision entirely on the hardware differences covered in other categories.

Battery life is a non-issue for either device — both the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 pack a substantial 6500 mAh cell, which is notably large even by current smartphone standards. Paired with a relatively efficient chipset and a 1080p display, this capacity comfortably supports heavy all-day use and for moderate users could stretch toward two days between charges.

Recharging is equally matched: both phones support 90W fast charging and ship with a charger included in the box. At 90W, top-up times are swift — going from low battery to a meaningful charge takes only a matter of minutes, making extended top-ups at a desk rather than overnight charging a practical option. Neither device offers wireless or reverse wireless charging, so cable-based charging is the only route for both.

This category is a complete tie. Capacity, charging speed, and every other battery attribute are identical. Neither phone holds any advantage here, and endurance should not factor into the decision between these two models.

Audio hardware is identical on the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60. Both feature stereo speakers and drop the 3.5mm headphone jack, pushing wired audio listeners toward a USB-C adapter. The stereo setup is the more relevant win here — dual-channel output delivers noticeably wider, more immersive sound for media consumption compared to a single mono speaker.

For wireless audio, neither phone supports any high-resolution Bluetooth codec — no LDAC, no aptX variant of any kind. This means users pairing premium wireless headphones will be limited to standard SBC or AAC transmission, which caps the audio quality ceiling for Bluetooth listening. It is a shared limitation, but one worth flagging for audiophiles considering either device.

With every audio specification matching exactly, this category is a tie. Neither the T4 Pro nor the V60 offers any sonic advantage over the other — the choice between them remains, as with the battery and OS categories, entirely dependent on the differentiators found elsewhere.

Most of the connectivity lineup is shared between the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 — both support 5G, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, dual SIM, USB Type-C, GPS with Galileo support, and an infrared sensor. The IR blaster is a practical touch that lets either phone double as a universal remote, and NFC covers contactless payments on both devices without distinction.

The one meaningful gap is Wi-Fi generation. The T4 Pro supports Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) in addition to Wi-Fi 4 and 5, while the V60 tops out at Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). Wi-Fi 6 brings improved throughput, better performance in congested environments with many connected devices, and more efficient power consumption during wireless activity. For users on a Wi-Fi 6 router — increasingly common in modern homes and offices — the T4 Pro will extract noticeably better real-world speeds and stability.

The Vivo T4 Pro earns the edge in this category on the strength of its Wi-Fi 6 support alone. It is a single but genuinely useful advantage, particularly as Wi-Fi 6 infrastructure continues to proliferate. Everything else in this group is evenly matched.

The miscellaneous category offers very little to distinguish the Vivo T4 Pro from the Vivo V60. Both include a video light — useful for illuminating subjects during video recording — and neither features a curved display, sapphire glass, or an e-paper screen. These are niche attributes that only matter to a specific subset of buyers, and on all of them, the two phones land identically.

This group is a complete tie. With only four data points and no divergence between the two devices, there is no basis here for preferring one over the other. Buyers should weigh this category as neutral and look to the more substantive differences uncovered in display, camera, performance, and connectivity.