Vivo T4 Pro VS Vivo V60 (256GB / 12GB RAM)

In terms of physical design, the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 are, by every measurable dimension, identical twins. Both share the same 163.5 × 77 × 7.5 mm footprint, the same 192 g weight, and the same calculated volume of 94.42 cm³. In practice, this means users switching between the two would notice absolutely no difference in how either phone sits in the hand, fits in a pocket, or feels during extended use.

On the durability front, both devices carry an IP68 rating with a 1.5 m waterproof depth rating, placing them on equal footing for water resistance. This level of protection is genuinely useful in daily life — think rain, splashes, or accidental drops in shallow water — though neither model offers a ruggedized or reinforced build beyond the standard IP68 certification.

Given that every single design spec is a perfect match, this category is an unambiguous tie. There is no design-based reason to choose one over the other; any differentiating factors between these two phones must be found in other specification groups entirely.

The panel fundamentals are a wash between these two phones. Both feature a 6.77″ OLED/AMOLED display running at 1080 × 2392 px with a pixel density of 388 ppi — sharp enough that individual pixels are essentially invisible at normal viewing distances — and both refresh at 120Hz, delivering smooth scrolling and responsive touch input. Damage-resistant glass is present on each, adding a baseline layer of scratch protection.

Where the two diverge is in HDR capability. The Vivo T4 Pro supports both HDR10 and HDR10+, while the Vivo V60 supports neither. In practical terms, this means the T4 Pro can render HDR-graded content — from streaming platforms like Netflix or Prime Video — with wider dynamic range, more nuanced highlights, and deeper shadows, provided the content is mastered for those standards. HDR10+ adds dynamic metadata on top, allowing scene-by-scene tone mapping for an even more refined picture. The V60 will display the same content, but without those enhancements, effectively falling back to standard dynamic range output.

The Vivo T4 Pro holds a clear edge in this category. The shared screen size, resolution, and refresh rate mean day-to-day usability is equivalent, but for anyone who regularly consumes HDR video content, the T4 Pro's support for HDR10 and HDR10+ is a meaningful and concrete advantage the V60 simply cannot match.

Under the hood, these two phones are completely indistinguishable. Both are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, built on a 4 nm process, paired with 12GB of LPDDR5 RAM clocked at 4200 MHz and 256GB of internal storage. The 4 nm fabrication node matters because it directly translates to a favorable balance of processing power and energy efficiency — more performance per watt compared to older nodes, which benefits both sustained workloads and battery longevity.

The CPU configuration — a tri-cluster arrangement of 1 prime, 4 performance, and 3 efficiency cores — combined with big.LITTLE scheduling means the chip can intelligently assign tasks to the right cores, keeping light workloads efficient and saving the high-frequency prime core for demanding moments. The GPU runs at 1000 MHz with DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2 support, which covers the full range of current Android gaming and graphics workloads. A 33.6 GB/s memory bandwidth ceiling ensures data moves quickly enough not to bottleneck the CPU or GPU under typical use.

This is another outright tie. Every performance-related data point — chipset, RAM, storage, clock speeds, memory bandwidth, TDP — is a perfect match. Neither the Vivo T4 Pro nor the Vivo V60 holds any performance advantage over the other; real-world speed, gaming capability, and multitasking headroom will be effectively identical on both devices.

The two primary cameras are closely matched — both lead with a 50 MP main shooter and a second 50 MP lens, share OIS, shoot 4K at 30fps, and offer 3x optical zoom with a maximum focal length of 73 mm. The T4 Pro's main aperture is a hair wider at f/1.8 versus the V60's f/1.9, a difference too small to meaningfully affect real-world low-light performance. Where the rear systems genuinely diverge is the third lens: the Vivo V60 deploys an 8 MP sensor at f/2.0, versus the T4 Pro's 2 MP at f/2.4 — a significant gap, as an 8 MP tertiary lens can contribute usable image data, while a 2 MP sensor is generally limited to depth-sensing assistance. The V60 also reaches a 15 mm minimum focal length compared to the T4 Pro's 26 mm, indicating a considerably wider ultra-wide field of view that opens up architectural, landscape, and tight-space photography the T4 Pro cannot replicate.

The selfie camera tells an equally lopsided story. The Vivo V60 packs a 50 MP front sensor with an f/2.2 aperture, while the Vivo T4 Pro offers 32 MP at f/2.5. Both the higher resolution and the wider aperture favor the V60 — more pixels means more detail and better cropping flexibility, and f/2.2 gathers more light than f/2.5, which matters for indoor and low-light selfies. Additionally, the V60 features 4 flash LEDs versus a single LED on the T4 Pro, suggesting more even and powerful flash illumination overall.

The Vivo V60 takes a clear edge in this category. Its advantages stack across the rear system (stronger tertiary lens, wider ultra-wide reach) and the front camera (higher resolution, wider aperture, more flash coverage), making it the more capable imaging device of the two based strictly on the provided specs.

Running Android 15 on both devices, the software experience is built on a modern foundation that brings meaningful privacy controls — including granular camera/microphone permissions, location options, and app tracking blocks — alongside quality-of-life features like dynamic theming, Picture-in-Picture, split-screen multitasking, and on-device machine learning. Neither phone receives direct OS updates, meaning both depend on Vivo's own update pipeline rather than getting patches straight from Google.

Scanning the full feature set, every single data point is identical across the Vivo T4 Pro and the Vivo V60. From battery health checks and extra dim mode to offline voice recognition, Live Text, and multi-user support — the two phones offer precisely the same software capabilities and the same limitations.

This group is a complete tie. Users of either device will land in an identical software environment with no feature gaps between them. The operating system offers no basis whatsoever for choosing one phone over the other.

A 6500 mAh cell is a generously sized battery by any measure — well above the 5000 mAh that has become the midrange standard — and both the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 carry exactly that capacity. In real-world terms, a battery of this size comfortably supports heavy users through a full day and can realistically stretch to two days for moderate users, reducing reliance on top-ups altogether.

Replenishing that large cell is handled equally on both phones via 90W fast charging, with a charger included in the box on each. At 90W, even a significantly depleted battery can be brought to a usable level quickly, which softens the one traditional downside of high-capacity cells — the longer time they typically need to recharge. Neither device offers wireless or reverse wireless charging, so cable-based charging is the only option on both.

Every battery specification is identical across the two phones, making this another unambiguous tie. Endurance expectations, charging speed, and the overall charging experience will be indistinguishable whether you pick the T4 Pro or the V60.

Both the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 share the same audio profile: stereo speakers but no 3.5 mm headphone jack. Stereo speakers are a meaningful inclusion for media consumption — videos, music, and gaming all benefit from the sense of width and separation that a dual-speaker setup provides over a single mono driver. The absent headphone jack means wired listening requires either a USB-C adapter or a switch to Bluetooth audio.

On the wireless audio front, neither device supports high-resolution Bluetooth codecs — no aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, or LDAC. For most listeners using mainstream wireless earbuds or headphones, this is unlikely to be a noticeable limitation in day-to-day use, but audiophiles seeking lossless wireless audio transmission will find both phones equally constrained.

With every audio specification mirrored exactly, this category is a tie. The T4 Pro and V60 offer an identical listening experience — the same strengths in speaker output and the same limitations in wired and high-fidelity wireless audio.

Across most connectivity pillars — 5G, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, dual SIM, USB-C, and an infrared sensor — the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 are evenly matched. Bluetooth 5.4 is a current-generation standard that brings improved connection stability and efficiency, and NFC covers contactless payments and quick pairing on both devices without distinction.

The one concrete differentiator in this group is Wi-Fi. The T4 Pro supports Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) in addition to Wi-Fi 4 and 5, whereas the V60 tops out at Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). Wi-Fi 6 is not merely a speed upgrade — it introduces improved performance in congested environments (such as homes with many connected devices), lower latency, and better power efficiency during wireless activity. For users on a Wi-Fi 6 router, the T4 Pro will make fuller use of that infrastructure; V60 owners on the same network will be capped at Wi-Fi 5 throughput and efficiency.

The Vivo T4 Pro takes a narrow but genuine edge here solely on the strength of its Wi-Fi 6 support. Everything else in this category is identical, but for users with modern networking hardware or future-proofing in mind, that single generational step in Wi-Fi capability is a real and practical advantage the V60 lacks.

The miscellaneous feature set for both the Vivo T4 Pro and Vivo V60 is lean and identical. Both include a video light — useful for illuminating subjects during video recording in dim conditions — and neither features a curved display, sapphire glass, or an e-paper panel. The absence of a curved screen means flat, edge-to-edge glass on both, which many users prefer for its resistance to accidental edge touches and easier screen protector application.

With no points of difference anywhere in this group, the result is a straightforward tie. Neither the T4 Pro nor the V60 offers anything in this category that the other does not, and none of the absent features represent a gap meaningful enough to influence a purchase decision on its own.